| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) 16:21 - Nov 5 with 1802 views | itfcjoe |
|  |
| |  |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:22 - Nov 5 with 1597 views | JackPITFC |
Absoloute joke, games gone. |  | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:23 - Nov 5 with 1574 views | longtimefan |
Can’t say I’m surprised. | | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:23 - Nov 5 with 1571 views | SpruceMoose |
If Football Manager has taught me anything it's that appeals are always rejected. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:23 - Nov 5 with 1563 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
Is another game added then? |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:25 - Nov 5 with 1533 views | catch74 |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:23 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Is another game added then? |
Doesn’t look like it - plus it looks like the FA cup match counts too. |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:25 - Nov 5 with 1532 views | chrismakin |
it had to be, can't take away a red if the ref reports it as such and it's not a case of mistaken identity |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:25 - Nov 5 with 1524 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:23 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Is another game added then? |
Not if the FA deem it a reasonable appeal.
Games are only added if they think it was a frivolous appeal. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:28 - Nov 5 with 1505 views | pointofblue |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:25 - Nov 5 by catch74 |
Doesn’t look like it - plus it looks like the FA cup match counts too. |
What about the Trophy match? If that counts too then Dozzell will only miss Shrewsbury in the league and will be back for Hull.
No surprise that it's been rejected but then the FA always get themselves deep in referee's back passages and it takes a lot to extract them from there. | |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:29 - Nov 5 with 1496 views | catch74 |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:28 - Nov 5 by pointofblue |
What about the Trophy match? If that counts too then Dozzell will only miss Shrewsbury in the league and will be back for Hull.
No surprise that it's been rejected but then the FA always get themselves deep in referee's back passages and it takes a lot to extract them from there. |
No - but at least he can play in that, keep up his game time. | |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:31 - Nov 5 with 1476 views | pointofblue |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:29 - Nov 5 by catch74 |
No - but at least he can play in that, keep up his game time. |
Damn, means he'll miss Hull.
I'd definitely rest Bishop against Portsmouth and Crawley now though, knowing our luck, he'll probably just pick up an injury in training instead. | |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:38 - Nov 5 with 1443 views | MonkeyAlan |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:22 - Nov 5 by JackPITFC |
Absoloute joke, games gone. |
You knew it would be. They all stick together. I never for one minute thought it would be resinded |  | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:43 - Nov 5 with 1430 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:25 - Nov 5 by ITFC_Forever |
Not if the FA deem it a reasonable appeal.
Games are only added if they think it was a frivolous appeal. |
Oh I thought they automatically added one if you lose, like how TFL double your penalty if you lose an appeal! | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:03 - Nov 5 with 1343 views | Steve_M |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:43 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Oh I thought they automatically added one if you lose, like how TFL double your penalty if you lose an appeal! |
No, only if it's frivolous. Jon Stead got an extra game for scoring two goals in the match after the appeal though. |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:06 - Nov 5 with 1327 views | SamWhiteUK |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 16:25 - Nov 5 by chrismakin |
it had to be, can't take away a red if the ref reports it as such and it's not a case of mistaken identity |
Don't be daft. Why would we ever have appealed if that's the case? |  | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:17 - Nov 5 with 1300 views | Bramidan |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:06 - Nov 5 by SamWhiteUK |
Don't be daft. Why would we ever have appealed if that's the case? |
I know this is somewhat radical but how about the coaches tell creative players not to throw themselves into tackles?
I remember Meurens response when he was asked why he didn't tackle. He said not his game, it was left to Wark to win the ball.
We seem to want just to create robots who are expected to run their guts out with no thought of creative skill.
Witness Ozel can't get a game for Arsenal, mad mad world. Yes have a midfield enforcer, somebody to win the ball but don't sacrifice your skilful creative players.
11 robots judged by distance they covered rather than what they did.
Any wonder football getting mundane? | | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:26 - Nov 5 with 1265 views | clive_baker |
I'm not surprised because overturning anything is an admission of wrong doing and who knows where that'll end up. Unless its blindingly obvious / mistaken identity etc the easy thing for them to do is reject it.
Games gone |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:34 - Nov 5 with 1242 views | Fixed_It |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:26 - Nov 5 by clive_baker |
I'm not surprised because overturning anything is an admission of wrong doing and who knows where that'll end up. Unless its blindingly obvious / mistaken identity etc the easy thing for them to do is reject it.
Games gone |
Would never be overturned unless the ref admits that he might have got it wrong. As he was very close to the tackle there was no chance of him admitting it, and they will always back their man. |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:58 - Nov 5 with 1175 views | NthQldITFC |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:17 - Nov 5 by Bramidan |
I know this is somewhat radical but how about the coaches tell creative players not to throw themselves into tackles?
I remember Meurens response when he was asked why he didn't tackle. He said not his game, it was left to Wark to win the ball.
We seem to want just to create robots who are expected to run their guts out with no thought of creative skill.
Witness Ozel can't get a game for Arsenal, mad mad world. Yes have a midfield enforcer, somebody to win the ball but don't sacrifice your skilful creative players.
11 robots judged by distance they covered rather than what they did.
Any wonder football getting mundane? |
I'm sorry to be a something of a pedant, but you really mustn't spell Arnold Mühren's name wrongly like that. |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:38 - Nov 5 with 1117 views | Bramidan |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:58 - Nov 5 by NthQldITFC |
I'm sorry to be a something of a pedant, but you really mustn't spell Arnold Mühren's name wrongly like that. |
Sorry, I should have checked it but was mid flow! | | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:42 - Nov 5 with 1103 views | Keaneish |
Authoritarian rule - referees backed by an institution impervious to scrutiny or reprimand. The appeal process is farcical. Can anyone remember any appeals that have been upheld? |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:44 - Nov 5 with 1099 views | wkj |
I didnt like the decision on the day, though some of the images later did look a little high. Bad decision, but I am not surprised they didn't see enough to overturn it. |  |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:48 - Nov 5 with 1094 views | patrickswell |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 17:17 - Nov 5 by Bramidan |
I know this is somewhat radical but how about the coaches tell creative players not to throw themselves into tackles?
I remember Meurens response when he was asked why he didn't tackle. He said not his game, it was left to Wark to win the ball.
We seem to want just to create robots who are expected to run their guts out with no thought of creative skill.
Witness Ozel can't get a game for Arsenal, mad mad world. Yes have a midfield enforcer, somebody to win the ball but don't sacrifice your skilful creative players.
11 robots judged by distance they covered rather than what they did.
Any wonder football getting mundane? |
I don’t think Dozzell did “throw himself into the challenge” though. |  | | |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:57 - Nov 5 with 1085 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:38 - Nov 5 by Bramidan |
Sorry, I should have checked it but was mid flow! |
You shouldn't be posting while having a piss either. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 19:01 - Nov 5 with 1078 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Dozzell appeal rejected (n/t) on 18:42 - Nov 5 by Keaneish |
Authoritarian rule - referees backed by an institution impervious to scrutiny or reprimand. The appeal process is farcical. Can anyone remember any appeals that have been upheld? |
That's a very good point. I mean, when THIS one isn't overturned I don't know what ever will be.
| |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
