| Lost another one 13:03 - Jan 6 with 10201 views | SitfcB |
Farewell sweet Prince, MonyTowbray.
🌹 |  |
| |  |
| Lost another one on 14:40 - Jan 6 with 2343 views | itfcjoe |
| Lost another one on 13:11 - Jan 6 by MattinLondon |
Shame, was he banned? If so I guess a lot of posters were waving imagery yellow cards at him begging Phil to send him off. |
I was having the long running debate in there, and I won't talk about conduct but I only reported one of his posts (in which he told me to F Off twice in it alongside a stream of insults), but the only person trying to get him banned was himself.
I have thick enough skin for him to insult me generally; but you can't tell numerous posters to f Off, totally misrepresent numerous posters and then do the same countless times to the guy who runs the forum.
It was a Bluefish style meltdown when he got to a stage where he wanted to be banned and went on and on until he was - the only surprise for me was how long it took |  |
| |
| Lost another one on 14:43 - Jan 6 with 2321 views | homer_123 |
| Lost another one on 14:17 - Jan 6 by Warkystache |
To be fair, most of them were warnings when he started teaching folk how to cook eggs.
Salmonella could've been rife in IP2 that day. |
'...how to cook eggs.'
I think that was the issue, there were not cooked. |  |
| |
| Lost another one on 14:55 - Jan 6 with 2237 views | J2BLUE |
| Lost another one on 14:17 - Jan 6 by Warkystache |
To be fair, most of them were warnings when he started teaching folk how to cook eggs.
Salmonella could've been rife in IP2 that day. |
IP2?!?!?! |  |
| |
| Lost another one on 14:57 - Jan 6 with 2224 views | SitfcB |
| Lost another one on 14:55 - Jan 6 by J2BLUE |
IP2?!?!?! |
I was going to say, didn’t think you were IP2, you’re not worthy. | |
| |
| Lost another one on 15:06 - Jan 6 with 2115 views | J2BLUE |
| Lost another one on 14:57 - Jan 6 by SitfcB |
I was going to say, didn’t think you were IP2, you’re not worthy. |
Chantry scum | |
| |
| Lost another one on 15:11 - Jan 6 with 2065 views | SitfcB |
| Lost another one on 15:06 - Jan 6 by J2BLUE |
Chantry scum |
FIGHT ME. | |
| |
| Lost another one on 15:12 - Jan 6 with 2062 views | J2BLUE |
| Lost another one on 15:11 - Jan 6 by SitfcB |
FIGHT ME. |
Look, IP2 has an Asda, IP3 has a Waitrose.
Debate over. | |
| |
| Lost another one on 15:18 - Jan 6 with 2008 views | PassionNotAnger |
| Lost another one on 13:25 - Jan 6 by blueasfook |
Not surprising. He was on thin ice after ripping into Phil yesterday I think. He was one offensive post away from a ban. |
More surprised you are still not banned given your blatant homophobic comment on here that had to be removed. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Lost another one on 15:21 - Jan 6 with 1966 views | SpruceMoose |
| Lost another one on 15:18 - Jan 6 by PassionNotAnger |
More surprised you are still not banned given your blatant homophobic comment on here that had to be removed. |
 |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Lost another one on 15:35 - Jan 6 with 1911 views | blueasfook |
| Lost another one on 15:18 - Jan 6 by PassionNotAnger |
More surprised you are still not banned given your blatant homophobic comment on here that had to be removed. |
Grow up and stop trying to cause trouble. Take it up with Phil if you have a problem. In fact, dont. The poor guy has had enough. |  |
| |
| Lost another one on 15:51 - Jan 6 with 1800 views | PassionNotAnger |
| Lost another one on 15:35 - Jan 6 by blueasfook |
Grow up and stop trying to cause trouble. Take it up with Phil if you have a problem. In fact, dont. The poor guy has had enough. |
With respect it’s you that needs to grow up, using the word gay as an insult/banter has been unacceptable to most of us for years, the fact you think it’s acceptable to use on a public forum suggests it’s you that has the need for education rather than me.
I won’t ignore stuff on a public forum like that so if you’d like me not to engage further with you then I respectfully suggest you choose your words more carefully | | | |
| Lost another one on 16:00 - Jan 6 with 1742 views | blueasfook |
| Lost another one on 15:51 - Jan 6 by PassionNotAnger |
With respect it’s you that needs to grow up, using the word gay as an insult/banter has been unacceptable to most of us for years, the fact you think it’s acceptable to use on a public forum suggests it’s you that has the need for education rather than me.
I won’t ignore stuff on a public forum like that so if you’d like me not to engage further with you then I respectfully suggest you choose your words more carefully |
I have spoken with Phil about it and we have sorted it. There was no homophobia, he said he even asked a gay TWTD poster if he was offended by it and he said "no".
So I will respectfully ask you (again) to butt out and stop trying to cause trying to cause trouble. | |
| |
| Lost another one on 16:03 - Jan 6 with 1698 views | JackNorthStand |
Stupid post.
Had me thinking for a split second that Tony Mowbray had passed away. | | | |
| Lost another one on 16:05 - Jan 6 with 1698 views | PassionNotAnger |
| Lost another one on 16:00 - Jan 6 by blueasfook |
I have spoken with Phil about it and we have sorted it. There was no homophobia, he said he even asked a gay TWTD poster if he was offended by it and he said "no".
So I will respectfully ask you (again) to butt out and stop trying to cause trying to cause trouble. |
Saying something is “too gay” is homophobic, just because one gay person says they weren’t offended doesn’t mean it’s acceptable.
Personally I’m suprised that the forum owner thinks a poster saying a conversation is “too gay” is acceptable on a public forum but that’s his decision, equally it’s my decision to call things out, others will judge for themselves I guess. On history more will be happy with it as “banter” than agree with me so that should make you happy at least [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 16:15]
| | | |
| Lost another one on 16:16 - Jan 6 with 1600 views | Kropotkin123 |
Good riddance. Consistently putting down and insulting anyone who didn't conform to their narrative.
That I share some of their opinions is irrelevant and think agreeing with someone doesn't mean you should tolerate or excuse their pugnacious delivery. [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 16:27]
|  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Lost another one on 16:25 - Jan 6 with 1474 views | PhilTWTD |
| Lost another one on 16:05 - Jan 6 by PassionNotAnger |
Saying something is “too gay” is homophobic, just because one gay person says they weren’t offended doesn’t mean it’s acceptable.
Personally I’m suprised that the forum owner thinks a poster saying a conversation is “too gay” is acceptable on a public forum but that’s his decision, equally it’s my decision to call things out, others will judge for themselves I guess. On history more will be happy with it as “banter” than agree with me so that should make you happy at least [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 16:15]
|
I removed the post as I didn't think it was appropriate, which I told Blueas, which is somewhat different from seeing it as acceptable. A gay poster said he wasn't offended by it in the context in which it was made. |  | | |
| Lost another one on 16:26 - Jan 6 with 1452 views | clive_baker |
| Lost another one on 16:25 - Jan 6 by PhilTWTD |
I removed the post as I didn't think it was appropriate, which I told Blueas, which is somewhat different from seeing it as acceptable. A gay poster said he wasn't offended by it in the context in which it was made. |
Quite. The fact it was removed indicates that it wasn't deemed acceptable. Not sure where the confusion is with that. |  |
| |
| Lost another one on 16:27 - Jan 6 with 1434 views | PhilTWTD |
| Lost another one on 16:25 - Jan 6 by PhilTWTD |
I removed the post as I didn't think it was appropriate, which I told Blueas, which is somewhat different from seeing it as acceptable. A gay poster said he wasn't offended by it in the context in which it was made. |
I've removed some posts which were unnecessary dredging up of old arguments. Don't think there's any need for it and I have asked for more civility on here. | | | |
| Lost another one on 16:33 - Jan 6 with 1365 views | MattinLondon |
| Lost another one on 14:40 - Jan 6 by itfcjoe |
I was having the long running debate in there, and I won't talk about conduct but I only reported one of his posts (in which he told me to F Off twice in it alongside a stream of insults), but the only person trying to get him banned was himself.
I have thick enough skin for him to insult me generally; but you can't tell numerous posters to f Off, totally misrepresent numerous posters and then do the same countless times to the guy who runs the forum.
It was a Bluefish style meltdown when he got to a stage where he wanted to be banned and went on and on until he was - the only surprise for me was how long it took |
He was defending trans people against transphobia. Good on him. |  | | |
| Lost another one on 16:39 - Jan 6 with 1338 views | Zapers |
| Lost another one on 16:33 - Jan 6 by MattinLondon |
He was defending trans people against transphobia. Good on him. |
Yes he was, by shouting at posters and generally being rude and abusive. | | | |
| Lost another one on 16:42 - Jan 6 with 1319 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| Lost another one on 16:33 - Jan 6 by MattinLondon |
He was defending trans people against transphobia. Good on him. |
No, he was quite rightly railing against the concept of transphobia, by quite wrongly misrepresenting, decontextualising and exaggerating what various posters had actually said, as he increasingly aggressively tilted at windmills to the point of libel. | | | |
| Lost another one on 16:44 - Jan 6 with 1284 views | GavTWTD |
| Lost another one on 16:42 - Jan 6 by FoghornGleghorn |
No, he was quite rightly railing against the concept of transphobia, by quite wrongly misrepresenting, decontextualising and exaggerating what various posters had actually said, as he increasingly aggressively tilted at windmills to the point of libel. |
Can we leave it there please |  |
| |
| Lost another one on 16:46 - Jan 6 with 1260 views | MattinLondon |
| Lost another one on 16:42 - Jan 6 by FoghornGleghorn |
No, he was quite rightly railing against the concept of transphobia, by quite wrongly misrepresenting, decontextualising and exaggerating what various posters had actually said, as he increasingly aggressively tilted at windmills to the point of libel. |
Blub. | | | |
| Lost another one on 16:46 - Jan 6 with 1250 views | MattinLondon |
| Lost another one on 16:44 - Jan 6 by GavTWTD |
Can we leave it there please |
Ok. | | | |
| Lost another one on 17:03 - Jan 6 with 1164 views | Mullet |
| Lost another one on 16:33 - Jan 6 by MattinLondon |
He was defending trans people against transphobia. Good on him. |
Not very successfully or with any real effectiveness unfortunately. Much like his position on most things, he doesn't seem to have grasped the debate or the subtleties very well, merely taken a position and got himself stuck. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
