| Using very simple words can someone explain 17:54 - Oct 27 with 6004 views | Keno |
How this was a yellow card
[Post edited 27 Oct 2024 17:54]
|  |
| |  |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 18:00 - Oct 27 with 5367 views | Swansea_Blue |
Ref big pillock |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 18:15 - Oct 27 with 5278 views | redrickstuhaart |
From that distance, it looks an even worse decision. How does the ref think the ball suddenly moved at right angles to the player running with it? This is one of those where a ref with integrity would watch it back and offer an apology and retract it if he is able.
If you freeze it you can actually see the striker still bolt upright when the ball has moved sideways, which would not be the case if he had been clipped first.
On the second angle you can also see the player put his feet together and dive, after the ball has gone as well.
Really really poor refereeing with potentially massive ramifications. Points in that game, no rb for the next game either. [Post edited 27 Oct 2024 18:22]
|  | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 18:22 - Oct 27 with 5236 views | MK1 |
it isn't. |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 18:26 - Oct 27 with 5204 views | gainsboroughblue |
Commentators seemed to be baying for the sending off as well.
Having seen it back several times, it is an absolute whopper of a crap decision. |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 18:29 - Oct 27 with 5162 views | hoppy |
Because the guys on the VAR thingy had just popped the kettle on, so were AFK at the time of the incident making a nice cuppa. |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 18:51 - Oct 27 with 5070 views | Eireannach_gorm |
Clear and obvious mistake. |  | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:01 - Oct 27 with 5008 views | sotd78 |
VAR should be allowed one look from three angles in real time. If they can't over rule the onfield decision in that time then we move on. Basically VAR makes a many mistakes as officials on the field. Time to bin it. |  |
| Blue shirts/white shorts - sotd78 |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:06 - Oct 27 with 4991 views | HighgateBlue |
I think people fail to be objective about their own team, and I think there is far too much criticism of professionals who are just trying to do their job.
Having said that, this was a p*ss poor decision. In my humble opinion. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:40 - Oct 27 with 4849 views | Ftnfwest |
Cracking tackle, tbf I don’t even think the Brentford lad is making that much of it |  | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:45 - Oct 27 with 4831 views | PhilTWTD |
Thought he'd got the ball at the time, but the dive was obvious. Think it's an anomaly that VAR doesn't look at second yellow cards. |  | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:50 - Oct 27 with 4783 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:01 - Oct 27 by sotd78 |
VAR should be allowed one look from three angles in real time. If they can't over rule the onfield decision in that time then we move on. Basically VAR makes a many mistakes as officials on the field. Time to bin it. |
We were one of the 19 clubs that voted to keep it. Only Wolves wanted it gone. |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:50 - Oct 27 with 4782 views | Illinoisblue |
A scandalously wrong decision. |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:52 - Oct 27 with 4782 views | portmanking |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:45 - Oct 27 by PhilTWTD |
Thought he'd got the ball at the time, but the dive was obvious. Think it's an anomaly that VAR doesn't look at second yellow cards. |
It's not just that, is it Phil? It's the fact that it was by no means a "clear and obvious error" from the ref re. penalty or no penalty. If the ref's interpretation live was that the foul was outside the box and the VAR team spent over 3 mins deliberating, I thought that's exactly the kind of thing that were meant to be stamping out this season?! | | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:59 - Oct 27 with 4703 views | PhilTWTD |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 19:52 - Oct 27 by portmanking |
It's not just that, is it Phil? It's the fact that it was by no means a "clear and obvious error" from the ref re. penalty or no penalty. If the ref's interpretation live was that the foul was outside the box and the VAR team spent over 3 mins deliberating, I thought that's exactly the kind of thing that were meant to be stamping out this season?! |
Agree. I think the initial foul was outside the area, as the referee did at the time, and HC presumably intended. | | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:09 - Oct 27 with 4604 views | ElephantintheRoom |
I’m guessing because the referee made the decision?
And the referees watching again and again on video replays on VAR thought it was dangerous play too
Get a grip Keno | |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:21 - Oct 27 with 4574 views | Keno |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:09 - Oct 27 by ElephantintheRoom |
I’m guessing because the referee made the decision?
And the referees watching again and again on video replays on VAR thought it was dangerous play too
Get a grip Keno |
I thought it was Clive Thomaseque | |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:47 - Oct 27 with 4469 views | Swansea_Blue |
Very similar to this. We’ve got a tackling problem in the game.
| |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:51 - Oct 27 with 4441 views | Vegtablue |
Maybe my eyes but I genuinely can't tell who connects with the ball from that footage, outside of Potter's foot or inside of Clarke's. Very disappointing we didn't receive the benefit of the doubt for something so tough to see (with my eyes anyway!).
 | | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 21:11 - Oct 27 with 4355 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:51 - Oct 27 by Vegtablue |
Maybe my eyes but I genuinely can't tell who connects with the ball from that footage, outside of Potter's foot or inside of Clarke's. Very disappointing we didn't receive the benefit of the doubt for something so tough to see (with my eyes anyway!).
|
Unless the striker is flicking it sideways, it is clear who got it first. And that he doesnt throw himself over until afterwards | | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 21:26 - Oct 27 with 4322 views | Deano69 |
In the same vein as Leif’s yellow for taking 10 seconds to take a thrown in yet Brentford’s long throw set up, several times, took ages including a ‘fake look at a short thrown’ sequence. |  |
| |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:01 - Oct 27 with 4166 views | WicklowBlue |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:51 - Oct 27 by Vegtablue |
Maybe my eyes but I genuinely can't tell who connects with the ball from that footage, outside of Potter's foot or inside of Clarke's. Very disappointing we didn't receive the benefit of the doubt for something so tough to see (with my eyes anyway!).
|
Like yourself, winding it back and forward frame by frame, Potter may have touched the ball first but Clarke had the dominant touch literally milliseconds after. Rubbish call 2 players going for a ball! Hope we can appeal it as if we don't have enough squad problems without suspensions! |  | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:09 - Oct 27 with 4113 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:01 - Oct 27 by WicklowBlue |
Like yourself, winding it back and forward frame by frame, Potter may have touched the ball first but Clarke had the dominant touch literally milliseconds after. Rubbish call 2 players going for a ball! Hope we can appeal it as if we don't have enough squad problems without suspensions! |
Cant appeal a yellow. Only the ref can do it voluntarily I believe. | | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:11 - Oct 27 with 4103 views | Bugs |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:01 - Oct 27 by WicklowBlue |
Like yourself, winding it back and forward frame by frame, Potter may have touched the ball first but Clarke had the dominant touch literally milliseconds after. Rubbish call 2 players going for a ball! Hope we can appeal it as if we don't have enough squad problems without suspensions! |
Can't appeal a yellow, I don't think. Even if we could, it's highly unlikely to be overturned. |  | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:12 - Oct 27 with 4086 views | WicklowBlue |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 22:11 - Oct 27 by Bugs |
Can't appeal a yellow, I don't think. Even if we could, it's highly unlikely to be overturned. |
Can't appeal a second yellow? Fair enough so. | | | |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 05:57 - Oct 28 with 3696 views | ElephantintheRoom |
| Using very simple words can someone explain on 20:21 - Oct 27 by Keno |
I thought it was Clive Thomaseque |
In which case Clarke will score a dubious own goal, get booked and then sent off playing for Everton in the same match against Brentford next year.
Get your money on now. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
