| So. Ben doak... £30 mill 20:28 - Jan 6 with 9565 views | FrimleyBlue |
Would you? |  |
| |  |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:30 - Jan 6 with 7112 views | John_Warks_Willy |
Being honest, never heard of him until this week. I’m sure I’m not alone. But yeah, why not? |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:34 - Jan 6 with 7043 views | Chris_ITFC |
No.
Potential, but not worth that, nor is that market value when you look at our summer business. |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:39 - Jan 6 with 6939 views | NthQldITFC |
I'd bend teak or mahogany with my teeth for £30m, so, yes. Bit of steam would help of course, in a fat pipe.
(what the f... is he on about now?) |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:43 - Jan 6 with 6841 views | gainsboroughblue |
£15 million of that is 'being on Liverpool's books' tax. |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:47 - Jan 6 with 6770 views | DarkBrandon |
Ok. But he has to be gentle |  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:49 - Jan 6 with 6711 views | ibbleobble |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:39 - Jan 6 by NthQldITFC |
I'd bend teak or mahogany with my teeth for £30m, so, yes. Bit of steam would help of course, in a fat pipe.
(what the f... is he on about now?) |
😂 |  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:49 - Jan 6 with 6694 views | LeoMuff |
No way - 26 league apps 2 goals, how does that equal £30m ? Silly money |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:51 - Jan 6 with 6636 views | billlm |
No |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:54 - Jan 6 with 6584 views | _clive_baker_ |
There's not a lot I wouldn't do for £30m tbh. |  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:56 - Jan 6 with 6515 views | LegendofthePhoenix |
nope. But I'd get Tom fellows from WBA for £8M. |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 21:01 - Jan 6 with 6419 views | Horsham |
I’m cheaper than £30m and Ben Doak will be too. |  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 23:06 - Jan 6 with 5651 views | NeverSayDie |
If the stakeholders feel he can provide a definite boost to our survival hopes, then absolutely yes. All of the summer signings costs are covered by the £140 million payments we are guaranteed through promotion over the next 3 years, BUT survive just one season and that figure rises to £300 million, that’s a hell of a carrot and gives us an opportunity to strengthen, first season is the hardest to overcome.
I reckon they’d take £23 mil to £25 mil [Post edited 6 Jan 23:18]
|  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 23:41 - Jan 6 with 5452 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Big yes, no brainer |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 04:56 - Jan 7 with 5095 views | MK1 |
No. If we stay up, then maybe in the summer, but to much of a risk right now. |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 05:33 - Jan 7 with 5035 views | Kropotkin123 |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:56 - Jan 6 by LegendofthePhoenix |
nope. But I'd get Tom fellows from WBA for £8M. |
Yeah, good shout. The Fellows from WBA or that Guy from Carlisle. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:00 - Jan 7 with 4743 views | Bellevue_Blue |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:56 - Jan 6 by LegendofthePhoenix |
nope. But I'd get Tom fellows from WBA for £8M. |
I'm not sure £8M would get you close to Fellows given that they rejected 10+ in the summer.
You could probably get him somewhere close to 15M but I still feel that would be a better deal than 30M for Doak.
That being said, I think the Doak deal will probably end up somewhere close to the Omari deal, 18M + 5M in add ons. | | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:23 - Jan 7 with 4620 views | Swansea_Blue |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 20:39 - Jan 6 by NthQldITFC |
I'd bend teak or mahogany with my teeth for £30m, so, yes. Bit of steam would help of course, in a fat pipe.
(what the f... is he on about now?) |
 |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:28 - Jan 7 with 4580 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:00 - Jan 7 by Bellevue_Blue |
I'm not sure £8M would get you close to Fellows given that they rejected 10+ in the summer.
You could probably get him somewhere close to 15M but I still feel that would be a better deal than 30M for Doak.
That being said, I think the Doak deal will probably end up somewhere close to the Omari deal, 18M + 5M in add ons. |
You are probably right, but this will be a competitive process with Palace involved (and they still haven’t replaced Olise) so will need to pay up for the player
FWIW I had heard the championship watchers rave about Doak earlier this season and thought he might be one we would go for given his profile and am delighted we are in for him - and Pat Nevin was absolutely raving about him when he played for Scotland | | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:51 - Jan 7 with 4422 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Maybe not 30. But an Omari like deal with Add ons. yes.
Serious talent. |  |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 09:03 - Jan 7 with 4327 views | LegendofthePhoenix |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:28 - Jan 7 by Exiled2Surrey |
You are probably right, but this will be a competitive process with Palace involved (and they still haven’t replaced Olise) so will need to pay up for the player
FWIW I had heard the championship watchers rave about Doak earlier this season and thought he might be one we would go for given his profile and am delighted we are in for him - and Pat Nevin was absolutely raving about him when he played for Scotland |
I'd certainly have Omari ahead of Doak - Omari is not only brilliant at dribbling and crossing, he has end product, which hasn't been much in evidence with Doak. Even comparing Doak now to Omari last season, Omari was ahead. And Omari is really good at tracking back and tackling. All things that maybe Doak could add to his game, but if Omari was £18M + add-ons last season, Doak should be less. | |
| |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 09:52 - Jan 7 with 4102 views | Bellevue_Blue |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 09:03 - Jan 7 by LegendofthePhoenix |
I'd certainly have Omari ahead of Doak - Omari is not only brilliant at dribbling and crossing, he has end product, which hasn't been much in evidence with Doak. Even comparing Doak now to Omari last season, Omari was ahead. And Omari is really good at tracking back and tackling. All things that maybe Doak could add to his game, but if Omari was £18M + add-ons last season, Doak should be less. |
I agree that Omari is currently a better player but he's also two years older then Doak. When Omari was 19 he was playing in the PL2. Doak is a stand out player in the Championship and fully capped international which all adds to his value ...
On the end product I'm not so sure. 2 goals, 6 assists feels like a pretty good return in 21 games for a 19YO. Averaged out over the season that would be 13 assists & 4 goals which would put him pretty much on par with Omari last year who had 5 assists & 10 goals. | | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 10:01 - Jan 7 with 4025 views | ReusersTown |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 08:51 - Jan 7 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
Maybe not 30. But an Omari like deal with Add ons. yes.
Serious talent. |
Yep, would feel good about an Omari/Delap type deal. | | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 10:53 - Jan 7 with 3751 views | TractorJack |
If that's what Liverpool are asking then they clearly don't want to sell him because nobody is paying that. |  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 11:00 - Jan 7 with 3677 views | dirtyboy |
Doak is very impressive at carrying the ball up the pitch and is very fast.
Given we're now sitting a bit deeper, that ability to get up the pitch quicker is more important.
McKenna will have identified his attributes and placed a fair significance on it.
No idea how much is in this but you can understand the interest. |  | | |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 11:03 - Jan 7 with 2420 views | Len_Brennan |
| So. Ben doak... £30 mill on 10:53 - Jan 7 by TractorJack |
If that's what Liverpool are asking then they clearly don't want to sell him because nobody is paying that. |
I suspect a bid of £20m, rising to £25m with add ons, and a sell on of 10-20% would do it; Liverpool have invited further bids rather than shut them down as out of the question, so they are prepared to do business at a 'slightly' higher level.
Any suggestion of a low value buy back option, should be met with a firm kick to the goolies, metaphorically, of course. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
