By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Really not going to put up with the same people misusing this Forum and wasting my time. Those posters have had enough warnings and take no notice, so really can't come as any surprise.
No doubt that’s partially aimed at me. Which is fine and I’ll rein it in.
Stokie said in that thread though that id been ‘forced to apologise’ by your good self. Just like to clarify I’ve never been banned, warned or forced to apologise in my 12 years of posting. I don’t like sly comments like that which are factually incorrect.
Edit - Removed that. Nobody else’s business.
Edit - I do wish you’d kept sitters though. Obviously that is your call which I respect but he’s defended all of us on here for many years on the cesspit that is Twitter.
PSS - Phil does a tough job and I don’t have any disrespect for him. So I shall bow out for a few days. #ThankYouPhil #ThankYouRommy #JusticeForSitters ;)
No doubt that’s partially aimed at me. Which is fine and I’ll rein it in.
Stokie said in that thread though that id been ‘forced to apologise’ by your good self. Just like to clarify I’ve never been banned, warned or forced to apologise in my 12 years of posting. I don’t like sly comments like that which are factually incorrect.
Edit - Removed that. Nobody else’s business.
Edit - I do wish you’d kept sitters though. Obviously that is your call which I respect but he’s defended all of us on here for many years on the cesspit that is Twitter.
PSS - Phil does a tough job and I don’t have any disrespect for him. So I shall bow out for a few days. #ThankYouPhil #ThankYouRommy #JusticeForSitters ;)
[Post edited 24 Sep 0:35]
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
You have shown so many times that you have the patience of a saint. Don’t know how, or why, you manage it. Just so glad you do. Love this place (99.9% of the time).
Those taking advantage of your obvious good nature to further their own petty squabbles and arguments in their attempts to ‘win’ should hang their heads in shame.
Better to stay silent and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt
No doubt that’s partially aimed at me. Which is fine and I’ll rein it in.
Stokie said in that thread though that id been ‘forced to apologise’ by your good self. Just like to clarify I’ve never been banned, warned or forced to apologise in my 12 years of posting. I don’t like sly comments like that which are factually incorrect.
Edit - Removed that. Nobody else’s business.
Edit - I do wish you’d kept sitters though. Obviously that is your call which I respect but he’s defended all of us on here for many years on the cesspit that is Twitter.
PSS - Phil does a tough job and I don’t have any disrespect for him. So I shall bow out for a few days. #ThankYouPhil #ThankYouRommy #JusticeForSitters ;)
[Post edited 24 Sep 0:35]
What are you on about?
I never claimed you were chucked from here, you're complaining about factually incorrect posts whilst literally making stuff up.
You piled into that thread saying some get more leeway than others and made it perfectly clear who you meant with the signature.
The innocence act is both insulting and ridiculous as is rewriting history whilst complaining about non-existent rewriting of history.
Just because you're upset that sitters can't control himself doesn't mean you have to target me. As I said, I've not had an issue with you and your attack from nowhere was uncalled for.
I never claimed you were chucked from here, you're complaining about factually incorrect posts whilst literally making stuff up.
You piled into that thread saying some get more leeway than others and made it perfectly clear who you meant with the signature.
The innocence act is both insulting and ridiculous as is rewriting history whilst complaining about non-existent rewriting of history.
Just because you're upset that sitters can't control himself doesn't mean you have to target me. As I said, I've not had an issue with you and your attack from nowhere was uncalled for.
SB
[Post edited 24 Sep 0:08]
Respectfully - Phil said stop. So I’ve stopped. Let’s both leave it there. We both know the game. And I actually don’t like seeing posters banned. Including you. So I don’t want either of us to talk ourselves into a first booking. Or a straight red.
I do hope the VAR panel have a look at the Sitters sending off though. I think it’s clumsy. And it’s clearly wreckless. But there’s not huge intent there and it’s lacking the force for me for it to be a red. Maybe a yellow and subbed off temporarily for his own sake but you hate to see those players who have that flair and creativity to really bring some excitement to the fans end their season in that manner.
I never claimed you were chucked from here, you're complaining about factually incorrect posts whilst literally making stuff up.
You piled into that thread saying some get more leeway than others and made it perfectly clear who you meant with the signature.
The innocence act is both insulting and ridiculous as is rewriting history whilst complaining about non-existent rewriting of history.
Just because you're upset that sitters can't control himself doesn't mean you have to target me. As I said, I've not had an issue with you and your attack from nowhere was uncalled for.
SB
[Post edited 24 Sep 0:08]
If you 2 don't stop it, I'll knock your heads together
Not been on here since Wednesday morning so no idea what’s happened, but I will say Phil that there are times when you just need to do what’s best for yourself, your own wellbeing and that of your family. The multiple aspects of TWTD & your roles in it must be incredibly time consuming-consuming, and people need to stop taking you for granted.
Give the guy a break TWTDers - and don’t just pay lip service here, then go forgetting all about it within 48 hours. I’ll tie a knot in my own hair too FPS - for Phil’s sake - (apols for hair references ).
I never claimed you were chucked from here, you're complaining about factually incorrect posts whilst literally making stuff up.
You piled into that thread saying some get more leeway than others and made it perfectly clear who you meant with the signature.
The innocence act is both insulting and ridiculous as is rewriting history whilst complaining about non-existent rewriting of history.
Just because you're upset that sitters can't control himself doesn't mean you have to target me. As I said, I've not had an issue with you and your attack from nowhere was uncalled for.
SB
[Post edited 24 Sep 0:08]
I think the term is ‘Signature Baiting’.
Like I said I didn’t see what went on so I could be wrong.
Like I said I didn’t see what went on so I could be wrong.
Have a good day people.
[Post edited 24 Sep 4:02]
I missed whatever went on but fair play to Phil I wouldn't fancy having to scrutinise every post. People can disagree fine by no need for people to get personal. At the end of the day we are all Town fans, sometimes you just have to agree to disagree.
As Benters says have a good day, no footy for another few weeks let's for aim for a sensible discussion without having to twist everything posters you don't like say and try to inject some humour like the aforementioned poster, life is too short!
No doubt that’s partially aimed at me. Which is fine and I’ll rein it in.
Stokie said in that thread though that id been ‘forced to apologise’ by your good self. Just like to clarify I’ve never been banned, warned or forced to apologise in my 12 years of posting. I don’t like sly comments like that which are factually incorrect.
Edit - Removed that. Nobody else’s business.
Edit - I do wish you’d kept sitters though. Obviously that is your call which I respect but he’s defended all of us on here for many years on the cesspit that is Twitter.
PSS - Phil does a tough job and I don’t have any disrespect for him. So I shall bow out for a few days. #ThankYouPhil #ThankYouRommy #JusticeForSitters ;)
[Post edited 24 Sep 0:35]
Surely how nice you are about the board on twitter etc. has nothing to do with it? I love Sitters (he recently helped me snare a Palace ticket) but Phil is very lenient and if he deemed him worthy of a ban (I'm going to plead 'the Arsene Wenger' here) then he probably was.
You've been a bit feisty yourself the last couple of days (along with ignoring reasonable points) which is unlike you. Are you alright?
Surely how nice you are about the board on twitter etc. has nothing to do with it? I love Sitters (he recently helped me snare a Palace ticket) but Phil is very lenient and if he deemed him worthy of a ban (I'm going to plead 'the Arsene Wenger' here) then he probably was.
You've been a bit feisty yourself the last couple of days (along with ignoring reasonable points) which is unlike you. Are you alright?
Rommy is decent bloke, but he definitely turned up and threw petrol on the fire last night.
I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun.
I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.