Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million 12:02 - Aug 28 with 3074 views | TRUE_BLUE123 | If I speak... [Post edited 28 Aug 12:03]
|  |
| |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:06 - Aug 28 with 2775 views | southnorfolkblue | Would have preferred him over Mcateer tbh |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:06 - Aug 28 with 2754 views | hunty21 | And we sign mcateer for more money oh dear |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:06 - Aug 28 with 2752 views | DorchesterBlue | We should have been all over this deal weeks ago! Ticks all the boxes of the right hand side |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:07 - Aug 28 with 2690 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:06 - Aug 28 by hunty21 | And we sign mcateer for more money oh dear |
Bizarre |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:10 - Aug 28 with 2593 views | LankHenners | Assumed it was a Hackney situation where he was holding out for Prem interest and if none came was happy to stay where he was. As has been said, bizarre if we were both never interested and spent more on McAteer. |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:14 - Aug 28 with 2460 views | Bellevue_Blue | Sometimes the flashy signings aren't always the best. Look how Philogene & Clarke have performed so far and they are in exactly the same mould as Fellows. You could even argue Fellows is more one dimensional. McAteer could be exactly what we need on that side. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:18 - Aug 28 with 2319 views | Blooos | What was our thinking behind buying McAteer for MORE than Fellows was available for then? bemused |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:19 - Aug 28 with 2268 views | pointofblue | From the outside looking in this looks poor. Fellows at £10m seems like a much better deal than McAteer at £12m. Maybe McKenna preferred the latter but really lacks logic from afar. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:23 - Aug 28 with 2165 views | JakeITFC |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:19 - Aug 28 by pointofblue | From the outside looking in this looks poor. Fellows at £10m seems like a much better deal than McAteer at £12m. Maybe McKenna preferred the latter but really lacks logic from afar. |
Not sure McAteer v Fellows is the comparison really - Clarke/Philogene (and possibly Egeli) more like for like. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:37 - Aug 28 with 1894 views | Blooos |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:23 - Aug 28 by JakeITFC | Not sure McAteer v Fellows is the comparison really - Clarke/Philogene (and possibly Egeli) more like for like. |
Why isnt it the comparison? similar age player, in the same league, in the same position. McAteer was an uninspiring overspend no matter how you look at it, really cant understand why we would pick to pay more for him than Fellows. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:39 - Aug 28 with 1842 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior | He shouldn’t be less than McAteer and please for the love of god get Egili. |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:39 - Aug 28 with 1829 views | tomitfc | Does seem a bit odd that we didnt go for him considering West Brom being our feeder club |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:41 - Aug 28 with 1781 views | ElderGrizzly | They have the Fernandes and Dibling money burning a hole I assume |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:43 - Aug 28 with 1761 views | GlasgowBlue |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:06 - Aug 28 by southnorfolkblue | Would have preferred him over Mcateer tbh |
But if we sign the Viking......... |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:44 - Aug 28 with 1748 views | mutters |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:18 - Aug 28 by Blooos | What was our thinking behind buying McAteer for MORE than Fellows was available for then? bemused |
Why don't we see how it pans out over the season before making judgement? I have a feeling McAteer will turn out to be a very good player for us |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:00 - Aug 28 with 1534 views | burnbudgiesburn |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:19 - Aug 28 by pointofblue | From the outside looking in this looks poor. Fellows at £10m seems like a much better deal than McAteer at £12m. Maybe McKenna preferred the latter but really lacks logic from afar. |
Maybe McKenna thinks McAteer is better suited to the Burns role in his system than Fellows (he is probably right imo) I think Fellows is a good player with potentially a higher ceiling and would not have been averse to signing him here. But there is definitely 'logic' in signing McAteer before Fellows. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:02 - Aug 28 with 1488 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:00 - Aug 28 by burnbudgiesburn | Maybe McKenna thinks McAteer is better suited to the Burns role in his system than Fellows (he is probably right imo) I think Fellows is a good player with potentially a higher ceiling and would not have been averse to signing him here. But there is definitely 'logic' in signing McAteer before Fellows. |
We don't need a player for the Burns role though, that position doesn't really exist in our team anymore ? If we ever go back to it, we have Ogbene ? |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:10 - Aug 28 with 1334 views | itfcsuth | Looks a really good price for him. Can only presume we didn't want him, or he didn't want us. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:15 - Aug 28 with 1252 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:02 - Aug 28 by TRUE_BLUE123 | We don't need a player for the Burns role though, that position doesn't really exist in our team anymore ? If we ever go back to it, we have Ogbene ? |
Exactly. |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:17 - Aug 28 with 1223 views | itfcsuth |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:02 - Aug 28 by TRUE_BLUE123 | We don't need a player for the Burns role though, that position doesn't really exist in our team anymore ? If we ever go back to it, we have Ogbene ? |
It's very strange that we are for some reason looking to move away from what was such a successful team, when you mention the Burns touchline role, the two 10's and the Leif Davis expressway. I can't comprehend why you would want to break something that worked so well, strange in my mind. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:18 - Aug 28 with 1184 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:17 - Aug 28 by itfcsuth | It's very strange that we are for some reason looking to move away from what was such a successful team, when you mention the Burns touchline role, the two 10's and the Leif Davis expressway. I can't comprehend why you would want to break something that worked so well, strange in my mind. |
Because it was done with 2 defensive midfielders, one that used to cover Davis and some of the players were obviously not good enough for PL so that ship has just sailed with age and money. |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:23 - Aug 28 with 1117 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:17 - Aug 28 by itfcsuth | It's very strange that we are for some reason looking to move away from what was such a successful team, when you mention the Burns touchline role, the two 10's and the Leif Davis expressway. I can't comprehend why you would want to break something that worked so well, strange in my mind. |
Teams play us so differently now. Teams are much deeper, they don't give us space in behind. They wont give Leif the run of the pitch. We are likely to dominate the ball in the majority of games and we will need individual quality to get us through. It is why that Right hand side role is so important. We need a match winner there a la Omari. Someone who can win 1v1 and get his shot off. |  |
|  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:40 - Aug 28 with 946 views | itfcsuth |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:23 - Aug 28 by TRUE_BLUE123 | Teams play us so differently now. Teams are much deeper, they don't give us space in behind. They wont give Leif the run of the pitch. We are likely to dominate the ball in the majority of games and we will need individual quality to get us through. It is why that Right hand side role is so important. We need a match winner there a la Omari. Someone who can win 1v1 and get his shot off. |
I'm not sure Birmingham or Southampton low blocked us, don't think either particularly parked up against us - Preston ironically did and we suffered defeat. The previous system worked so well, with having a front 4, then Leif arriving late as an extra/spare man - such a powerful system that was so well coached, with and without the ball, we were so dominant with it - seems a very strange play to move away from. I'm not sure we can just rely on 'individual quality' as tactical approach, I'm not sure there is much more individual quality in the group than the class of 2023/2024 regardless. The tactical shift so far has looked a little disjointed to me. |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 14:06 - Aug 28 with 736 views | blueoutlook |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 13:40 - Aug 28 by itfcsuth | I'm not sure Birmingham or Southampton low blocked us, don't think either particularly parked up against us - Preston ironically did and we suffered defeat. The previous system worked so well, with having a front 4, then Leif arriving late as an extra/spare man - such a powerful system that was so well coached, with and without the ball, we were so dominant with it - seems a very strange play to move away from. I'm not sure we can just rely on 'individual quality' as tactical approach, I'm not sure there is much more individual quality in the group than the class of 2023/2024 regardless. The tactical shift so far has looked a little disjointed to me. |
Doesn’t appear to be any individual quality from what I see. I think at the moment it’s a case of chucking 11 players on a pitch and praying! |  | |  |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 15:18 - Aug 28 with 520 views | WestSussexBlue |
Tom Fellows to Southampton for 10 million on 12:06 - Aug 28 by DorchesterBlue | We should have been all over this deal weeks ago! Ticks all the boxes of the right hand side |
Does he fit the character profile that Kmc and Ashton want though? Our players, as referenced before by Kmc need to be invested in as much away from the pitch as on it. Representing the club in the community for example. |  | |  |
| |