By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
We sadly will not tolerate bad posts about us when we bring fun and raise thousands for various charities so if you follow @TalkingTownITFC then please unfollow us. As we are seeking legal action, this is all we can say. Thank you for your time
I don't know the history, what is talking towns issue?
Seems the front man wants to paint himself as some kind of Saint when it comes to charity work. Seemed to try to hijack the ticket donations a few weeks ago.
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 22:58 - Jan 16 by Marshalls_Mullet
I don't know the history, what is talking towns issue?
Seems the front man wants to paint himself as some kind of Saint when it comes to charity work. Seemed to try to hijack the ticket donations a few weeks ago.
On the show after Sunderland they asked on the pod how come no one from the foundation was there.
Cruncher’s question is a fair one but his tone is deliberately provocative. Phillips to his credit tries to smooth things over. Malc, as so often, shows the emotional strength of a 4-year-old and throws around threats of legal action between multiple pouty tweets.
Sometimes when I’m feeling down about the plight of ITFC I remember weapons like these lot have also had to suffer through the last 20 years and then I’m slightly less upset.
1
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 00:16 - Jan 17 with 1926 views
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 00:57 - Jan 17 by jeera
Surely those two are old allies though?
Weren't they both responsible for the same group of [12] people who 'demonstrated' in favour of sacking Jim?
That Cruncher definitely was - absolutely pathetic.
Malcolm simply shouldn’t be running the Twitter account of that foundation. And the people involved wonder why the club might want to distance them from it FFS.
1
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 07:10 - Jan 17 with 1701 views
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 07:34 - Jan 17 by saffers12
Cruncher not for me anymore
I know for a fact - someone gave him the nod on Mckenna - then published as it had come from him
I love the idea that people have a “trait mark” Malcy’s love for the club was demonstrated when he tried to sue it because they refused to recognize his group as the official branch of the Haverhill supporters club.
0
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 08:14 - Jan 17 with 1587 views
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 23:01 - Jan 16 by Illinoisblue
Cruncher’s question is a fair one but his tone is deliberately provocative. Phillips to his credit tries to smooth things over. Malc, as so often, shows the emotional strength of a 4-year-old and throws around threats of legal action between multiple pouty tweets.
Bedsheet knows exactly what he’s doing here, he knows Malcy has a skin that is as thin as a one day old frog.
In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 08:14 - Jan 17 by GlasgowBlue
Bedsheet knows exactly what he’s doing here, he knows Malcy has a skin that is as thin as a one day old frog.
Highly predictable how this would then play out.
Very naughty of him.
[Post edited 17 Jan 2022 8:28]
This must have been on their YouTube channel weeks ago, as is presumably from when it was unveiled? Why is it kicking off now….
Cruncher has a habit of being out of order and OTT with his opinions but sees it as speaking the truth and acceptable. He is free to say what he wants, obviously, but it isn’t withou consequence when you are a recognisable person in the community
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 09:25 - Jan 17 by itfcjoe
This must have been on their YouTube channel weeks ago, as is presumably from when it was unveiled? Why is it kicking off now….
Cruncher has a habit of being out of order and OTT with his opinions but sees it as speaking the truth and acceptable. He is free to say what he wants, obviously, but it isn’t withou consequence when you are a recognisable person in the community
Yeah but u can't sue someone for it! I know what you mean though. The KBF twitter page has been doing tweets about podcasts for weeks and I always wondered what it was about. Must have been that, and I guess last night he couldn't hold it in any longer!
0
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 09:30 - Jan 17 with 1358 views
Malcy’s back with his legal action threats 😬 on 09:25 - Jan 17 by itfcjoe
This must have been on their YouTube channel weeks ago, as is presumably from when it was unveiled? Why is it kicking off now….
Cruncher has a habit of being out of order and OTT with his opinions but sees it as speaking the truth and acceptable. He is free to say what he wants, obviously, but it isn’t withou consequence when you are a recognisable person in the community
He doesn't help himself at times.
I was thinking the other day that it had been quiet on the TT front recently and they hadn't been antagonising anyone for a while.
Heard the clip and it's the way he says it rather than the content, the 'strange' bit at the end wasn't needed.
0
Worth noting that.... on 09:34 - Jan 17 with 1368 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
