| Poor so far (n/t) 20:00 - Jan 25 with 4244 views | Millsey |
|  | | |  |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:32 - Jan 25 with 1006 views | StokieBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:30 - Jan 25 by FrimleyBlue |
Here we go. SBs on his down voting spree again.
He ll be here to tell us we are wrong and Jacksons played well. |
You are wrong.
Horrible views of the match.
I can only assume you're watching on the radio again.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:32 - Jan 25 with 994 views | hype313 |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:30 - Jan 25 by Dubtractor |
Yep. Jackson not great, but he has given us a lot more than Norwood this half. |
Neither of them should be playing ahead of Celina, Chaplin and Bonne though.
Very strange set up. |  |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:33 - Jan 25 with 980 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:28 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
This is incredibly harsh and clearly a predetermined narrative based on history.
He's put the two of the three best crosses into the box this half and worked the channel.
For instance Norwood has done very little yet this thread is a Jackson pile-on.
SB
Edit: Great tracking back from him there as well. [Post edited 25 Jan 2022 20:30]
|
Oh you're on your predetermined rubbish again. Carry on. No interest in it
Both been poor. We know why norwood gets picked. No one knows why Jackson has and why he's centre of attention and rightly so. |  |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:33 - Jan 25 with 967 views | JDB23 |
Both strikers absolutely dreadful that half, Pigott and Chaplin should be screaming to get on. |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:34 - Jan 25 with 947 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:28 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
This is incredibly harsh and clearly a predetermined narrative based on history.
He's put the two of the three best crosses into the box this half and worked the channel.
For instance Norwood has done very little yet this thread is a Jackson pile-on.
SB
Edit: Great tracking back from him there as well. [Post edited 25 Jan 2022 20:30]
|
Blimey SB, it's not a pile on. It's Ipswich fans expressing their views on a player who isn't offering much.
Since my post he put in a cracking ball for Bakinson. Norwood has also offered very little.
Poor so far (n/t) by GlasgowBlue 25 Jan 2022 20:28Norwood doing very little as well.
Aluko is the only forward player who is coming out with any credit.
I don't see much point in having a football message board if members can't put forward real time opinions on how our players are performing. |  |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:34 - Jan 25 with 955 views | StokieBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:33 - Jan 25 by FrimleyBlue |
Oh you're on your predetermined rubbish again. Carry on. No interest in it
Both been poor. We know why norwood gets picked. No one knows why Jackson has and why he's centre of attention and rightly so. |
But he hasn't been poor in the context of the performance.
It's irrelevant why he has been picked, I don't think he should be playing but I judge his performance on it's merits, something you clearly aren't doing.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:34 - Jan 25 with 929 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:27 - Jan 25 by FrimleyBlue |
No
But we have Jackson upfront. Pretty much end of attack |
Has been more in it than Norwood but I guess Norwood is not the current scapegoat |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:35 - Jan 25 with 925 views | quad |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:17 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
Jackson has been OK.
To single out Jackson is very harsh.
SB |
It's not harsh.
He's sheeite.
JC. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:35 - Jan 25 with 912 views | StokieBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:34 - Jan 25 by GlasgowBlue |
Blimey SB, it's not a pile on. It's Ipswich fans expressing their views on a player who isn't offering much.
Since my post he put in a cracking ball for Bakinson. Norwood has also offered very little.
Poor so far (n/t) by GlasgowBlue 25 Jan 2022 20:28Norwood doing very little as well.
Aluko is the only forward player who is coming out with any credit.
I don't see much point in having a football message board if members can't put forward real time opinions on how our players are performing. |
He had done two good runs down the wing and done the best cross at the match before all the criticism started.
It was unjustified given the other performances being put in.
Your Norwood post was far later.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:35 - Jan 25 with 911 views | wkj |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:33 - Jan 25 by FrimleyBlue |
Oh you're on your predetermined rubbish again. Carry on. No interest in it
Both been poor. We know why norwood gets picked. No one knows why Jackson has and why he's centre of attention and rightly so. |
Jackson has been on par with most of the team, had a couple of good moments. I don't understand why anyone would say any of our players have been poor, or great. |  |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:35 - Jan 25 with 908 views | tivo |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:30 - Jan 25 by FrimleyBlue |
Here we go. SBs on his down voting spree again.
He ll be here to tell us we are wrong and Jacksons played well. |
Jackson needs to get closer to Norwood. One of them needs to make near post runs. Carroll needs someone to show him he has a right foot. | | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:36 - Jan 25 with 873 views | BarcaBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:28 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
This is incredibly harsh and clearly a predetermined narrative based on history.
He's put the two of the three best crosses into the box this half and worked the channel.
For instance Norwood has done very little yet this thread is a Jackson pile-on.
SB
Edit: Great tracking back from him there as well. [Post edited 25 Jan 2022 20:30]
|
Jackson certainly contributed a lot more than Norwood, don't know why he's been singled out here. Would get Chaplin and Celina on early second half though, Wimbledon are there to be beaten. |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:36 - Jan 25 with 858 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:34 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
But he hasn't been poor in the context of the performance.
It's irrelevant why he has been picked, I don't think he should be playing but I judge his performance on it's merits, something you clearly aren't doing.
SB |
Well I am. I don't however see a couple bits of him doing the Job he's paid to do and decide that makes him brilliant. It's 45 minutes of a half in which he by far has broken down many of our attacks.
That's no forgetting others of course. It's not be great by a few.
It's certainly a game we need our big players into tho. | |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:36 - Jan 25 with 861 views | RobTheMonk |
- Back line are fine when they're not trying to play needless balls.
- Wes Burns is a very good player at this level.
- A left footed left back would be hugely beneficial.
- Bakinson doing alright.
- Carroll takes too long on the ball at times.
- Front three struggling to find space.
- There's no flow to the game but we're the better team.
Get Celina and or Chaplin on. |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:37 - Jan 25 with 859 views | ITFC_1988 |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:34 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
But he hasn't been poor in the context of the performance.
It's irrelevant why he has been picked, I don't think he should be playing but I judge his performance on it's merits, something you clearly aren't doing.
SB |
Jackson and Norwood both been poor. Although Jackson has offered more so far. Norwood's first touch has deserted him tonight.
Impressed with Bakinson and Woolfy is playing well again. | | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:37 - Jan 25 with 837 views | itfcsuth |
We look fine. Up against a side who give very little away, very defensively structured.
You can see why they’ve drawn the most games in the league. |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:39 - Jan 25 with 795 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:35 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
He had done two good runs down the wing and done the best cross at the match before all the criticism started.
It was unjustified given the other performances being put in.
Your Norwood post was far later.
SB |
My Norwood post was 9 minutes after my Jackson post. In a 45 minute half. If we are keeping count?
They have both been poor. Bring on Bonne and Chaplin. | |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:40 - Jan 25 with 784 views | backwaywhen |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:28 - Jan 25 by GlasgowBlue |
Norwood doing very little as well.
Aluko is the only forward player who is coming out with any credit. |
Bakinson look decent ….. | | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:40 - Jan 25 with 783 views | quad |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:35 - Jan 25 by StokieBlue |
He had done two good runs down the wing and done the best cross at the match before all the criticism started.
It was unjustified given the other performances being put in.
Your Norwood post was far later.
SB |
Norwood and Jackson have both been poor.
Take them both off.
JC. | | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:40 - Jan 25 with 783 views | WicklowBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:33 - Jan 25 by FrimleyBlue |
Oh you're on your predetermined rubbish again. Carry on. No interest in it
Both been poor. We know why norwood gets picked. No one knows why Jackson has and why he's centre of attention and rightly so. |
Can both you and SB just STOP???? It's easy just to share your thoughts without continuing with the pot shots at each other. Honestly, I'm happy to hear both of your views but the constant sniping distracts from all the good stuff you both post. (At times  ) |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:42 - Jan 25 with 742 views | StokieBlue |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:40 - Jan 25 by WicklowBlue |
Can both you and SB just STOP???? It's easy just to share your thoughts without continuing with the pot shots at each other. Honestly, I'm happy to hear both of your views but the constant sniping distracts from all the good stuff you both post. (At times ) |
I am not singling him out, I am responding to poor posts and dubious opinions.
Unfortunately most of them seem to be his.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:42 - Jan 25 with 725 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:36 - Jan 25 by BarcaBlue |
Jackson certainly contributed a lot more than Norwood, don't know why he's been singled out here. Would get Chaplin and Celina on early second half though, Wimbledon are there to be beaten. |
Perhaps Jackson has been better than Norwood but only one of those two have a goal in him |  |
| |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:43 - Jan 25 with 710 views | billlm |
That team selections mckenna trying to get a cheap win belittling the dons, he way we play at times there's deffinatly no easy games in league one, if he dosent sort this lack of chances quickly he will end up looking stupud, |  | | |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:46 - Jan 25 with 668 views | footers |
| Poor so far (n/t) on 20:40 - Jan 25 by WicklowBlue |
Can both you and SB just STOP???? It's easy just to share your thoughts without continuing with the pot shots at each other. Honestly, I'm happy to hear both of your views but the constant sniping distracts from all the good stuff you both post. (At times ) |
You can read both one view points and its polar opposite from just one of them if you give it a few hours. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
