| Gregg Wallace 10:14 - Dec 1 with 11330 views | Miaow |
How long before he is on GB News?... |  |
| |  |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:39 - Dec 2 with 1414 views | bluelagos |
I did wonder whatever happened to Prince Andrew's PR advisor, now we now. |  |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:39 - Dec 2 with 1414 views | itfcjoe |
| Gregg Wallace on 07:22 - Dec 2 by Reus30 |
Look, I personally think he is a creep but the trial by media that happens all the time is a bit much.
Go through the proper channels, avoid the massive pile on and do things the right way. I respect him coming out fighting in that regard.
But I do still think he did it all. |
It's just your bog standard cancelling of someone who has clearly p155ed off too many people in too many areas and they just want shot of.
I'm sure every mainline presenter on all these big shows has enough to bring them down out there as and when people want to do it, and it is just when the rolling stone gathers enough moss that it happens.
Big egos in roles, when no one dares say no, and their jokes are laughed along with and the behaviours encouraged means that there will be a tipping point and Gregg Wallace has obviously found his and enough people in important roles want shot of him so he'll be gone now.
Similar to when Richard Keys went at Sky, and they will feel like a victim because they've never acted any differently, and there will be plenty of people still in the industry who are worse and will never be called out for it |  |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:44 - Dec 2 with 1389 views | blueasfook |
| Gregg Wallace on 06:52 - Dec 2 by StokieBlue |
You're welcome.
Perhaps if you were consistent in your views rather than clearly posting to provoke posters you consider to be "woke" then one wouldn't have to point out all the inconsistencies in your positions.
SB |
I see your break from TWTD did you the world of good Stokers. |  |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:52 - Dec 2 with 1339 views | Lord_Lucan |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:36 - Dec 2 by blueasfook |
Lol, I'll be in BKK in a couple of weeks time, I'll take him down there |
A few of my colleagues are over there now - all expenses paid.
They are planning the Bangkok New Year fireworks display which they are firing for the Thai government. My mate is firing some sequences from a big skyscraper. Feck that, you can count me out! He sent me the below images.
 |  |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:53 - Dec 2 with 1342 views | StokieBlue |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:44 - Dec 2 by blueasfook |
I see your break from TWTD did you the world of good Stokers. |
Morning Blueas, I hope you are well.
I'm genuinely interested, can you explain to me what's wrong with pointing out inconsistencies in posting and clear narratives?
To be honest I didn't want to get involved in this stuff but I find it very annoying when people are just outright disingenuous.
I'm going to attempt to go back to ignoring it but there is a question to be looked at here. Should this place handwave such Trumpian behaviour?
Anyway, I've had my say and thus I'll bid you all good day.
SB |  |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:54 - Dec 2 with 1325 views | lowhouseblue |
| Gregg Wallace on 07:48 - Dec 2 by thebooks |
I’m sure everyone will be very grateful that these incidents have been deemed “low end” on the sexual abuse scale from some man on a football forum. Thank you for clearing that up, and your legal opinion.
The state of some of the replies in this post – from a bunch of men. “Saucy banter” – what is this, 1973? I’ve no doubt this was used as a way of dismissing all sorts of behaviour back then.
Very interesting post-Trump’s win how some of these views are coming out of the woodwork from apparently reasonable people. |
objectively what has been quoted is at the low end of such things. it doesn't involve touching, it doesn't involve propositioning, it doesn't involve the abuse of power or coercion to make people do things. all the things quoted (except for taking his shirt off in his dressing room) are verbal and no one has disputed that they were intended as jokes, even if inappropriate. the one thing i have seen quoted precisely is that he said to a woman "you're 3 years younger than my wife" - and I'm not convinced that alone is all that bad.
man on football forum incapable of seeing the relative significance of things - pretty much sums up online discussion alas. but thank you of course for your black and white absence of nuance or judgement. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:00 - Dec 2 with 1283 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:39 - Dec 2 by itfcjoe |
It's just your bog standard cancelling of someone who has clearly p155ed off too many people in too many areas and they just want shot of.
I'm sure every mainline presenter on all these big shows has enough to bring them down out there as and when people want to do it, and it is just when the rolling stone gathers enough moss that it happens.
Big egos in roles, when no one dares say no, and their jokes are laughed along with and the behaviours encouraged means that there will be a tipping point and Gregg Wallace has obviously found his and enough people in important roles want shot of him so he'll be gone now.
Similar to when Richard Keys went at Sky, and they will feel like a victim because they've never acted any differently, and there will be plenty of people still in the industry who are worse and will never be called out for it |
We can’t be too far away from Russell Brand baptising Gregg Wallace in the Thames to wash away his sins. |  |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:04 - Dec 2 with 1252 views | lowhouseblue |
| Gregg Wallace on 23:18 - Dec 1 by vapour_trail |
Privileged male very keen to defend other privileged male even without knowledge of the nature or specifics of the complaints made by multiple women.
Very fcking weird and bad look, lowhouseblue. [Post edited 1 Dec 2024 23:24]
|
i've said repeatedly that i'm only commenting on what's been reported - if there is more to come out then i know nothing about it. what has been reported is objectively at the low end of such things - it's nowhere near criminal, i'm not convinced that as reported it necessarily meets the threshold for harassment. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Gregg Wallace on 09:04 - Dec 2 with 1248 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Gregg Wallace on 22:35 - Dec 1 by reusersfreekicks |
Saucy banter! Wow. Not saw the women made to feel so uncomfortable see it as such |
The phrase "saucy banter" was said by Illinoisblue, I was merely repeating it in my reply to him, and yet weirdly it's me who you reply to to complain about it, not the originator. I also added "if that's all it is", which you've decided to leave out in your response. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:06 - Dec 2 with 1233 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Gregg Wallace on 06:26 - Dec 2 by Zapers |
Why not go overboard, i mean you did with me when you suggested that i was in favour of woman being mugged. ( This was soon removed by admin, and rightly so)
So now you're in favour of a sleazebag and a creep who finds it hilarious and I'm guessing sexually a turn on, to talk dirty and suggestive in front of middle aged woman of a certain age.
His ego has clearly got the better of him. Why otherwise would a normal 60 year old man flaunt his half naked body, and sometimes almost naked body other than because in his deluded mind, he is irresistible to woman.
In my opinion he deserves everything he has coming to him. To excuse his behavior by blaming it on a "A handful of middle class- woman of a certain age" Tells me everything i need to know about the scumbag. |
"I'm guessing".
Sums you up doesn't it? | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:13 - Dec 2 with 1201 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Gregg Wallace on 07:48 - Dec 2 by thebooks |
I’m sure everyone will be very grateful that these incidents have been deemed “low end” on the sexual abuse scale from some man on a football forum. Thank you for clearing that up, and your legal opinion.
The state of some of the replies in this post – from a bunch of men. “Saucy banter” – what is this, 1973? I’ve no doubt this was used as a way of dismissing all sorts of behaviour back then.
Very interesting post-Trump’s win how some of these views are coming out of the woodwork from apparently reasonable people. |
We are commenting on what's been reported and I at least added "if that's all it is" when repeating the phrase "saucy banter". There is clearly a difference between sexual jokes and sexual harassment/assault. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:16 - Dec 2 with 1176 views | lowhouseblue |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:00 - Dec 2 by GlasgowBlue |
We can’t be too far away from Russell Brand baptising Gregg Wallace in the Thames to wash away his sins. |
though, to be fair, brand was accused of sexual assault, grooming and exposing himself. these things are not exactly the same as being crude and telling inappropriate jokes and lumping them together seems a little bit harsh. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:18 - Dec 2 with 1168 views | Zapers |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:13 - Dec 2 by The_Flashing_Smile |
We are commenting on what's been reported and I at least added "if that's all it is" when repeating the phrase "saucy banter". There is clearly a difference between sexual jokes and sexual harassment/assault. |
Sexual jokes can be sexual harassment  |  | | |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:25 - Dec 2 with 1132 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:18 - Dec 2 by Zapers |
Sexual jokes can be sexual harassment |
They can be, of course, depending on the content and context; how they are delivered, the frequency towards another person etc. But they aren't necessarily, by themselves, sexual harassment. Obviously.
I presume you've never told a joke of a sexual nature? | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:39 - Dec 2 with 1067 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:16 - Dec 2 by lowhouseblue |
though, to be fair, brand was accused of sexual assault, grooming and exposing himself. these things are not exactly the same as being crude and telling inappropriate jokes and lumping them together seems a little bit harsh. |
Quite. I’m talking about the options left to celebs when they are no longer in the public eye. He’s too old for Love Island. I’m a Celebrity and Big Brother won’t touch him for a couple of years so being baptised by Brand seems the most logical move for him. | |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:41 - Dec 2 with 1050 views | Zapers |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:25 - Dec 2 by The_Flashing_Smile |
They can be, of course, depending on the content and context; how they are delivered, the frequency towards another person etc. But they aren't necessarily, by themselves, sexual harassment. Obviously.
I presume you've never told a joke of a sexual nature? |
"There is clearly a difference between sexual jokes and sexual harassment"
This is what you said in another post.
Maybe just easier to admit you don't really understand how much woman can be offended by something you consider to be 'Saucy banter" | | | |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:41 - Dec 2 with 1047 views | lowhouseblue |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:39 - Dec 2 by GlasgowBlue |
Quite. I’m talking about the options left to celebs when they are no longer in the public eye. He’s too old for Love Island. I’m a Celebrity and Big Brother won’t touch him for a couple of years so being baptised by Brand seems the most logical move for him. |
quite - i doubt we'll see him on tv again. his video didn't help. effectively saying that lots of women shared his sense of humour isn't going to cut it. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:42 - Dec 2 with 1043 views | itfcjoe |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:39 - Dec 2 by GlasgowBlue |
Quite. I’m talking about the options left to celebs when they are no longer in the public eye. He’s too old for Love Island. I’m a Celebrity and Big Brother won’t touch him for a couple of years so being baptised by Brand seems the most logical move for him. |
I think they should all be sent to an island, like Phil Schofield did with his castaway episode. Where they can all moan and say how they don't need it any more, and how happy they are to not be in TV as they all claim to be - but then they get given the option of a Hunger Games competition.
They can either head into obscurity, or fight to the death for a chance to be allowed back on Prime Time TV - and they'll all choose the latter because obscurity is worse than death for them now | |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:46 - Dec 2 with 999 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:41 - Dec 2 by Zapers |
"There is clearly a difference between sexual jokes and sexual harassment"
This is what you said in another post.
Maybe just easier to admit you don't really understand how much woman can be offended by something you consider to be 'Saucy banter" |
We know what I said in another post, you're replying to my reply to it! What bit of my full explanation are you struggling with?
And kindly answer my question, "I presume you've never told a joke of a sexual nature?" | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:55 - Dec 2 with 965 views | DJR |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:25 - Dec 2 by The_Flashing_Smile |
They can be, of course, depending on the content and context; how they are delivered, the frequency towards another person etc. But they aren't necessarily, by themselves, sexual harassment. Obviously.
I presume you've never told a joke of a sexual nature? |
I am in my mid-60s and have never done so.
It is possible as a male not to engage in what I would regard a puerile, and to women inappropriate, behaviour, whatever one's age. [Post edited 2 Dec 2024 10:00]
|  | | |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:55 - Dec 2 with 969 views | PhilTWTD |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:16 - Dec 2 by lowhouseblue |
though, to be fair, brand was accused of sexual assault, grooming and exposing himself. these things are not exactly the same as being crude and telling inappropriate jokes and lumping them together seems a little bit harsh. |
Wallace has also been accused of what I would assume would be viewed by the police sexual assault.
Slightly surprised so many are seeking to defend or make light of his behaviour.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/32050186/gregg-wallace-felt-bum-inside-the-factory/
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:59 - Dec 2 with 935 views | blueasfook |
| Gregg Wallace on 08:53 - Dec 2 by StokieBlue |
Morning Blueas, I hope you are well.
I'm genuinely interested, can you explain to me what's wrong with pointing out inconsistencies in posting and clear narratives?
To be honest I didn't want to get involved in this stuff but I find it very annoying when people are just outright disingenuous.
I'm going to attempt to go back to ignoring it but there is a question to be looked at here. Should this place handwave such Trumpian behaviour?
Anyway, I've had my say and thus I'll bid you all good day.
SB |
I am well thanks. Hope you are good too. | |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 10:18 - Dec 2 with 875 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Gregg Wallace on 09:55 - Dec 2 by DJR |
I am in my mid-60s and have never done so.
It is possible as a male not to engage in what I would regard a puerile, and to women inappropriate, behaviour, whatever one's age. [Post edited 2 Dec 2024 10:00]
|
Blimey, that's astonishing and quite unusual. Never, in your entire life, have you told a joke of a sexual nature. Extraordinary.
Regardless, my point was sexual jokes aren't necessarily sexual harassment. Would you not agree? [Post edited 2 Dec 2024 10:21]
| |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Gregg Wallace on 10:23 - Dec 2 with 858 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
We were commenting on what was known at the time. This story in The Sun was posted last night at 10pm, it's the first I, and I assume others, have seen of it.
We've clearly spoken about sexual jokes.
Touching, if true, is an entirely different matter. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Phil's got alerts from The Sun switched on, who knew!? (n/t) on 10:25 - Dec 2 with 847 views | Bloots |
| Gregg Wallace on 10:23 - Dec 2 by The_Flashing_Smile |
We were commenting on what was known at the time. This story in The Sun was posted last night at 10pm, it's the first I, and I assume others, have seen of it.
We've clearly spoken about sexual jokes.
Touching, if true, is an entirely different matter. |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
