Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Good idea! 16:58 - Dec 5 with 1811 viewsSitfcB


COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

5
Good idea! on 17:02 - Dec 5 with 1715 viewsSwansea_Blue

It does rely on refs paying attention and not turning their backs. And also being able to reliably counts to 8 seconds. Good idea in theory though. I’d do the same for throw-in; just reverse the throw if they time waste.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

1
Good idea! on 17:13 - Dec 5 with 1667 viewsCrayonKing

Will they actually enforce it though? There’s already a rule about how long they’re allowed to hold on to the ball for but I’ve never seen it enforced
1
Good idea! on 17:21 - Dec 5 with 1591 viewsWeWereZombies

Good idea! on 17:02 - Dec 5 by Swansea_Blue

It does rely on refs paying attention and not turning their backs. And also being able to reliably counts to 8 seconds. Good idea in theory though. I’d do the same for throw-in; just reverse the throw if they time waste.


Surely the eight second count down is a perfect job for the VAR portacabin and they let the ref know if it has been breached ?

Poll: What was in Wes Burns' imaginary cup of tea ?

7
Good idea! on 17:22 - Dec 5 with 1575 viewspointofblue

I swear there used to be a six second rule, otherwise the keeper would be booked? It seemed to fade away quite quickly.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
Good idea! on 17:26 - Dec 5 with 1556 viewsDubtractor

Good idea! on 17:22 - Dec 5 by pointofblue

I swear there used to be a six second rule, otherwise the keeper would be booked? It seemed to fade away quite quickly.


The Palace keeper certainly took a LOT longer than 6 seconds every time he had it.

I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll: Important Christmas poll - which is the best Celebration chocolate?

1
Good idea! on 18:02 - Dec 5 with 1379 viewsFifeITFC

Good idea! on 17:22 - Dec 5 by pointofblue

I swear there used to be a six second rule, otherwise the keeper would be booked? It seemed to fade away quite quickly.




Rule got scrubbed quickly.

Poll: Lambert goes, would you prefer an ex-Town connection replacement or not?

1
Good idea! on 18:04 - Dec 5 with 1359 viewstextbackup

Mate pointed out the palace keeper Tuesday, we watched him, 18seconds he had it at one point

We’ll be good again... one day
Poll: How many home games do you get to a season

1
Good idea! on 18:05 - Dec 5 with 1352 viewsLankHenners

Will soon get rolled back once managers and players start complaining that their GK is being prevented from releasing the ball sooner and it's not fair to make them get rid of it if there's nothing on etc.

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Poll: What is Celina's problem?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Good idea! on 18:15 - Dec 5 with 1288 viewsKeno

Good idea! on 17:13 - Dec 5 by CrayonKing

Will they actually enforce it though? There’s already a rule about how long they’re allowed to hold on to the ball for but I’ve never seen it enforced


maybe the VAR officials could help

Poll: Best Superman - in view of the new film who’s the best
Blog: [Blog] My World Cup Reflections

1
Good idea! on 18:45 - Dec 5 with 1142 viewsVaughan8

Good idea! on 18:15 - Dec 5 by Keno

maybe the VAR officials could help


Surely thats not something VAR needs to get involved in. Its not difficult to know what 8 seconds is. Its not going to be timed every time (i doubt!)

I like the idea of the OP because the Gks do take the mick and have done for years and years. Is it just going to lead to goalies faking injuries all the time to get more time.
1
Good idea! on 18:45 - Dec 5 with 1137 views66notout

Good idea! on 18:04 - Dec 5 by textbackup

Mate pointed out the palace keeper Tuesday, we watched him, 18seconds he had it at one point


And on at least two occasions he carried it over the 18-yard line before kicking it upfield.
1
Good idea! on 18:46 - Dec 5 with 1123 viewsYou_Bloo_Right

Good idea! on 18:15 - Dec 5 by Keno

maybe the VAR officials could help


4th official has little else to do.

Poll: Are this group of ITFC players the best squad in the division?

0
Good idea! on 19:04 - Dec 5 with 1049 viewsWeWereZombies

Good idea! on 18:46 - Dec 5 by You_Bloo_Right

4th official has little else to do.


C'mon, that electronic number board doesn't hold itself up y'know. Then there are the studs on the bottoms of the substitutes boots to check,manager's sweary outbursts to listen out for, Conor Chaplin's goal celebration sprints to try and check, probably some check lists to fill in etc. It's a wonder there isn't a fourth official's assistant.

Poll: What was in Wes Burns' imaginary cup of tea ?

0
Good idea! on 19:05 - Dec 5 with 1048 viewswrightsrightglove

This would solve a lot of problems, booking the keeper is pretty pointless because they know they’re never going to get a second yellow for carrying on taking too long so it’s not really a deterrent at all
2
Good idea! on 19:08 - Dec 5 with 1027 viewsPhilTWTD

Good idea! on 18:02 - Dec 5 by FifeITFC



Rule got scrubbed quickly.


Rule is still there, just completely ignored.
2
Good idea! on 19:09 - Dec 5 with 1027 viewsPhilTWTD

Penalty rather than a corner would really sort the issue.
2
Good idea! on 19:12 - Dec 5 with 1007 viewsMullet

Good idea! on 19:08 - Dec 5 by PhilTWTD

Rule is still there, just completely ignored.


Who said that?

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

0
Good idea! on 19:15 - Dec 5 with 1001 viewsGarv

I love the intention but I could see it getting messy and controversial at times. Will also cause a lot of mistakes because keepers will be hurriedly getting rid of it - might be a good or bad thing for that reason.

I'd probably make it 10 seconds, considering you often see 15-20 I don't think that would be too bad.
[Post edited 5 Dec 2024 19:15]

Poll: Pick a goal to win the derby in stoppage time...

0
Good idea! on 19:32 - Dec 5 with 908 viewsberkstractorboy

Good idea! on 19:15 - Dec 5 by Garv

I love the intention but I could see it getting messy and controversial at times. Will also cause a lot of mistakes because keepers will be hurriedly getting rid of it - might be a good or bad thing for that reason.

I'd probably make it 10 seconds, considering you often see 15-20 I don't think that would be too bad.
[Post edited 5 Dec 2024 19:15]


Once the keeper gets the ball then players have to work harder to make themselves available? If the outfield players don't work hard enough then it could lead to mistakes.

I agree 10 seconds a better amount of time if you really are going to enforce this.

I assume as well its only time in the keepers hands this applies to and not the ball at the keepers feet as they can waste time like that but upto the opposition to press.
0
Good idea! on 19:33 - Dec 5 with 905 viewsredrickstuhaart

Or they could just apply the existing rule. Within a fortnight, the issue would stop.
2
Good idea! on 19:34 - Dec 5 with 901 viewsredrickstuhaart

Good idea! on 17:22 - Dec 5 by pointofblue

I swear there used to be a six second rule, otherwise the keeper would be booked? It seemed to fade away quite quickly.


Its still there but its an indirect free kick not a booking. I have seen it applied twice. Once correctly, and once by a disgraceful biased ref in a youth game, who applied it despite it being a kick off the deck, by a side already 12 down.
0
Good idea! on 19:42 - Dec 5 with 866 viewsEdwardStone

Good idea! on 18:45 - Dec 5 by 66notout

And on at least two occasions he carried it over the 18-yard line before kicking it upfield.


I noticed this too....

"Rules are there to be broken " kinda keeper
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025