| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… 19:02 - Jan 3 with 10844 views | Kieran_Knows |
|  |
| |  |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:08 - Jan 3 with 8186 views | SitfcB |
As is usual with transfers, must be something in him wanting to come otherwise there’d be no point in a bid?? |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:09 - Jan 3 with 8170 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Serious talent that kid. Ceiling is very high.
Liverpool will want around 25 to even consider I imagine. |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:09 - Jan 3 with 8151 views | Kieran_Knows |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:08 - Jan 3 by SitfcB |
As is usual with transfers, must be something in him wanting to come otherwise there’d be no point in a bid?? |
And if the bid is ‘far below’ their valuation, but we’re still in talks, also suggests to me it might not be a million miles off.
All eyes on Boro team tomorrow then… | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 with 8071 views | Swansea_Blue |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:09 - Jan 3 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
Serious talent that kid. Ceiling is very high.
Liverpool will want around 25 to even consider I imagine. |
Silly money considering he’s done nothing so far (in terms of the PL) and hasn’t even played a season of professional football yet.
But it seems KM is being brave in sticking to his plan for developing players. Will it be enough? Is this guy likely to have an impact like Omari or Delap? |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 with 8065 views | SitfcB |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:09 - Jan 3 by Kieran_Knows |
And if the bid is ‘far below’ their valuation, but we’re still in talks, also suggests to me it might not be a million miles off.
All eyes on Boro team tomorrow then… |
£20 million plus big add-ons will probably do it.
Seen him a few times on TV this season, looks very decent. | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:12 - Jan 3 with 8014 views | Kieran_Knows |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 by SitfcB |
£20 million plus big add-ons will probably do it.
Seen him a few times on TV this season, looks very decent. |
Yup, suspect it’ll be a figure around that. Also helps that Carrick, - who will obviously be loathed to lose him - will probably be putting more of a word in for him to come to us, than Palace given his relationship with McKenna, if both sides do agree a deal.
Fingers crossed. | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:16 - Jan 3 with 7889 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 by Swansea_Blue |
Silly money considering he’s done nothing so far (in terms of the PL) and hasn’t even played a season of professional football yet.
But it seems KM is being brave in sticking to his plan for developing players. Will it be enough? Is this guy likely to have an impact like Omari or Delap? |
He has had an impact at senior level in games before for Liverpool.
Had some good games for Scotland against good opposition.
I watched him play vs Bayern Munich in pre season a while back and he left Alphonso Davies for dead. He is absolutely rapid. [Post edited 3 Jan 19:45]
| |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:21 - Jan 3 with 7643 views | cordonblue |
Corr yes please, watched him a few times and been really impressed with his direct running and pressing, would be great for us on the right.
Still have to pinch myself when we are linked with players young players like this... |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:33 - Jan 3 with 7233 views | pointofblue |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 by SitfcB |
£20 million plus big add-ons will probably do it.
Seen him a few times on TV this season, looks very decent. |
I imagine Liverpool will ask for either a matching or buy back clause as well. | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:34 - Jan 3 with 7203 views | le2blue |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:12 - Jan 3 by Kieran_Knows |
Yup, suspect it’ll be a figure around that. Also helps that Carrick, - who will obviously be loathed to lose him - will probably be putting more of a word in for him to come to us, than Palace given his relationship with McKenna, if both sides do agree a deal.
Fingers crossed. |
Will be a fabulous signing. Him setting up Delap with Philogene on the other side and Omari behind will br something else.
Heard that Carrick would like Jack Clarke, not sure we’d be up for loosing him. |  | | |
| Plus a £25m buy-back clause.... on 19:34 - Jan 3 with 7190 views | Bloots |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 by SitfcB |
£20 million plus big add-ons will probably do it.
Seen him a few times on TV this season, looks very decent. |
....like the Delap one. |  |
| "He's been a really positive influence on my life, I think he's a great man" - TWTD User (May 2025) |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:38 - Jan 3 with 7058 views | football |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:08 - Jan 3 by SitfcB |
As is usual with transfers, must be something in him wanting to come otherwise there’d be no point in a bid?? |
Looks to have legs but Palace have also put in a bid of £15m by all accounts. He's a great player so if we can beat a potential regelation team to his signature then all good. Anyone got Fridge's number to get him to do some inside work? | | | |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:44 - Jan 3 with 6878 views | Swansea_Blue |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:16 - Jan 3 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
He has had an impact at senior level in games before for Liverpool.
Had some good games for Scotland against good opposition.
I watched him play vs Bayern Munich in pre season a while back and he left Alphonso Davies for dead. He is absolutely rapid. [Post edited 3 Jan 19:45]
|
Thanks, sounds promising. I suppose we’re in as good a place with recruitment as we have been for years (decades), so I trust KM and the team to do their homework and be able to spot a player. I was thinking we’d aim more for experience now, but I suppose affordability is an issue. | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:45 - Jan 3 with 6803 views | Kieran_Knows |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:34 - Jan 3 by le2blue |
Will be a fabulous signing. Him setting up Delap with Philogene on the other side and Omari behind will br something else.
Heard that Carrick would like Jack Clarke, not sure we’d be up for loosing him. |
Am I correct in saying Clarke cannot play for anyone else this season other than Sunderland? Didn’t he start a couple games for them before he joined us? | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:46 - Jan 3 with 6780 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:44 - Jan 3 by Swansea_Blue |
Thanks, sounds promising. I suppose we’re in as good a place with recruitment as we have been for years (decades), so I trust KM and the team to do their homework and be able to spot a player. I was thinking we’d aim more for experience now, but I suppose affordability is an issue. |
Likewise. That's why the Godfrey deal makes so much sense.
Doak is still a raw talent but just one of those that if it goes right would be jackpot for the club. A bit like Delap I think in terms of ceiling. | |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:49 - Jan 3 with 6636 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
Incredible if true. |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:53 - Jan 3 with 6449 views | snapeblue |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:45 - Jan 3 by Kieran_Knows |
Am I correct in saying Clarke cannot play for anyone else this season other than Sunderland? Didn’t he start a couple games for them before he joined us? |
Ah yes you’re right! | | | |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:59 - Jan 3 with 6221 views | Metal_Hacker |
Seen this guy play for Liverpool a couple of time and for me he really stood out
Would love this to happen and I really wanted Cajuste and that’s worked out ok to date |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 20:01 - Jan 3 with 6115 views | Vic |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 by SitfcB |
£20 million plus big add-ons will probably do it.
Seen him a few times on TV this season, looks very decent. |
So did Clarke  |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 20:17 - Jan 3 with 5739 views | smithy69 |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:11 - Jan 3 by Swansea_Blue |
Silly money considering he’s done nothing so far (in terms of the PL) and hasn’t even played a season of professional football yet.
But it seems KM is being brave in sticking to his plan for developing players. Will it be enough? Is this guy likely to have an impact like Omari or Delap? |
This lad is absolute mustard and another that would develop under McKenna | | | |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 20:55 - Jan 3 with 5195 views | yellowrider |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 19:09 - Jan 3 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
Serious talent that kid. Ceiling is very high.
Liverpool will want around 25 to even consider I imagine. |
Agreed. He destroyed us in the home game earlier this season. Pace and trickery to burn. Boro will be desperate to keep him as their promotion hopes hinge very much on the impact he can make. I would be very surprised if the Scousers flogged him off. | | | |
| Plus a £25m buy-back clause.... on 20:56 - Jan 3 with 5190 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Plus a £25m buy-back clause.... on 19:34 - Jan 3 by Bloots |
....like the Delap one. |
I wish they would ban buy back clauses, or at least make a rule that the buy back price is at least 3x the original fee. |  |
| |
| Plus a £25m buy-back clause.... on 21:02 - Jan 3 with 5030 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Plus a £25m buy-back clause.... on 20:56 - Jan 3 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I wish they would ban buy back clauses, or at least make a rule that the buy back price is at least 3x the original fee. |
Or the buying club don't be stupid originally and agree to a buyback for anyless than 3 x the fee you're paying |  |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 21:08 - Jan 3 with 4968 views | pointofblue |
Part of me is wondering if Doak is a smokescreen. Previously we've been linked with one player, then swoop for another which hasn't been reported.
Edit - been, not beem. [Post edited 3 Jan 21:32]
| |
| |
| £16m bid rejected for Ben Doak… on 21:08 - Jan 3 with 4967 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
Where a buy back clause is agreed, the buying club will be getting the player at a lower fee than without. So it will often depend on available finances.
Do you pay 25% more for future surety, or keep the extra millions for another player deal? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
