| Omari to Brentford 21:21 - Jul 29 with 9966 views | portmanking |
Deal off. Magnificent news all round. Especially if we get Hackney. Full of excellent young English talent.
Still worry that Forest may come in for Omari but it seems like KMac has worked his magic. |  | | |  |
| Omari to Brentford on 23:46 - Jul 29 with 2833 views | football |
He's staying...I'm confident on this and have always been.
Brentford was not a good choice
Staying is, especially with Hayden - we have hell of a team.
Riping up the Championship is better than floundering with Brentford who will be battered | | | |
| Omari to Brentford on 23:50 - Jul 29 with 2807 views | PhilTWTD |
| Omari to Brentford on 21:27 - Jul 29 by Kieran_Knows |
I just don’t see Palace paying £40m for him. It’s not how they generally do business. |
I don't either, don't think they're interested at all. Am more hopeful he stays, seems to have forged a good relationship with Ashley Young on and off the field. |  | | |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:13 - Aug 1 with 2159 views | SitfcB |
No surprise that this was bullshît  Don’t think you have a very good hit rate no matter how much you pretend to be ITK. |  |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:31 - Aug 1 with 1966 views | portmanking |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:13 - Aug 1 by SitfcB |
No surprise that this was bullshît Don’t think you have a very good hit rate no matter how much you pretend to be ITK. |
It's not remotely BS. | | | |
| I can't believe he'll stay, or that we'll land Hackney on 12:36 - Aug 1 with 1829 views | Dyland |
If I'm proved wrong a smidgeon of faith in football will be reignited in my pot belly. |  |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:44 - Aug 1 with 1724 views | Zx1988 |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:13 - Aug 1 by SitfcB |
No surprise that this was bullshît Don’t think you have a very good hit rate no matter how much you pretend to be ITK. |
You're calling BS based on one contradictory tweet from a very questionable source? | |
| |
| I can't believe he'll stay, or that we'll land Hackney on 12:46 - Aug 1 with 1690 views | CaptainAhab |
| I can't believe he'll stay, or that we'll land Hackney on 12:36 - Aug 1 by Dyland |
If I'm proved wrong a smidgeon of faith in football will be reignited in my pot belly. |
There's definitely a universe where we go into the season with both Hutch and Hackney in the side, I'm just hoping it's this one | | | |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 with 1524 views | darkhorse28 |
| Omari to Brentford on 21:29 - Jul 29 by StokieBlue |
The books are pretty balanced I believe given the parachute payments.
I was under the impression we didn't need to sell Omari unless you can provide evidence to the contrary?
SB |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Omari to Brentford on 13:16 - Aug 1 with 1492 views | Zx1988 |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 by darkhorse28 |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. |
Sorry, you lost me at the point at which you treated the leaked 'sales pitch' as gospel, especially given that it actually said "Up to £100m+ in player sales...". | |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:17 - Aug 1 with 1470 views | Mullet |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 by darkhorse28 |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. |
I think you’ve misunderstood the £100m sales figure as a potential not a fact. That leak was something designed to drum up investment, not a statement of intent.
Everyone I’ve heard talk about the finances who seem to have an interest in it, thinks we are in a very healthy position. Given we seem to want a money ball system, I’m guessing we sell high to offset and finance squad building for the next promotion. |  |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:17 - Aug 1 with 1467 views | StokieBlue |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 by darkhorse28 |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. |
What a strange post.
Doesn't answer the question and is littered with insults for no reason.
Unpleasant.
SB |  | | |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:27 - Aug 1 with 1323 views | _clive_baker_ |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 by darkhorse28 |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. |
"Go and study accounts". Cringe.
FWIW, as a chartered accountant I wouldn't recommend anyone devotes 4 years to studying if their objective is to decipher the platitudinal bobbins you've written there. It won't help in the slightest. |  | | |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:28 - Aug 1 with 1305 views | Herbivore |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 by darkhorse28 |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. |
And they all lived happily ever after. |  |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 14:02 - Aug 1 with 1151 views | USA |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:31 - Aug 1 by portmanking |
It's not remotely BS. |
Ignore SitfcB. He thinks he owns this forum and it’s getting tedious. [Post edited 1 Aug 14:05]
| |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 14:06 - Aug 1 with 1099 views | Mullet |
| Omari to Brentford on 14:02 - Aug 1 by USA |
Ignore SitfcB. He thinks he owns this forum and it’s getting tedious. [Post edited 1 Aug 14:05]
|
What’s Sitters done? Boy only just started owning trainers again recently. | |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 14:15 - Aug 1 with 1001 views | NedPlimpton |
| Omari to Brentford on 12:13 - Aug 1 by SitfcB |
No surprise that this was bullshît Don’t think you have a very good hit rate no matter how much you pretend to be ITK. |
Hard agree
Can't recall him getting anything right that wasn't already published elsewhere
Happy to be proved wrong |  | | |
| Omari to Brentford on 17:02 - Aug 1 with 546 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Omari to Brentford on 22:41 - Jul 29 by ArnoldMoorhen |
Haha! I was thinking more about the difficult last eighteen months.
Maybe he finally took Ashley's advice this Summer, eh? ;-) |
Except Rashford's head wasn't turned to join Man Utd. He was already there and has only had complimentary things to say about the club despite clearly being treated badly there. His head has been turned to join Barcelona but who can blame him? Who would suggest that he shoudn't do so, especially since things were clearly at an end at Man Utd until they sack Amorim?
Aside from that, the advice from Ashley Young may well have been about right. If Omari listens to good advice, he will go on to have a great career one would expect. |  |
| |
| Omari to Brentford on 17:17 - Aug 1 with 447 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Omari to Brentford on 13:13 - Aug 1 by darkhorse28 |
It fascinates me you want evidence. Where’s your evidence the books are balanced?
Wanting things to be true isn’t vidence.
We sold Delap through 24/25
Our owners explicitly say there will be £100 million sales.
Most of our £150 million spend last year is amortised through the next four years
Our base case won’t be promotion
Our wage bill alone is over 100% our entire revenue without parachute payments… which will be our base case financially.
So whatever KM and Omari do or don’t want, he will be sold… there’s a £20 million liability at the start of EFL seasons in the future that Gamechanger don’t want to fund, they’ve made that very clear …. They couldn’t spell it out any clearer.
Of course if we win promotion, £150 million V’s £5 million in TV revenue alone is very different.
But after all last summers promises, it’s clear promotion isn’t the financial base case for gamechanger, and that’s sensible.
Amazing the owners have put their position on record, in the simple language possible, and here we are…. Blinded by the emotion.
Would be great if he stayed, we won promotion and the finances take care of themselves, but we aren’t in that position…. We need financial clarity, and £35 million does that.
We don’t need to sell….. we really DO.
Go and study accounts… no offence but this is basic.
Delap through 24/25 was a choice… it’s the only way we could meet our compliance, otherwise through 25/26 gives us more leverage for a year longer too.
You don’t need to see the accounts.
You just need to understand the basics.
Omari was gone the second that Delap deal was pulled forward… lower our liabilities, give us scope for signings spread over longer, and mitigate PSR.
This is why your crap about relegation being progress was just plain wrong.
We lose our best young players.
If you can publish why you think our finances don’t require player sales, that would be great… send them to Brett too… because he seems confused. |
90% of that is made up.
And for God’s sake, study English, learn how to use sentences and paragraphs, not being rude, but it’s basic. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
