| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! 21:44 - Mar 3 with 3668 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Every man did their job.
Superb. |  |
| |  |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 23:10 - Mar 3 with 641 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Our fans never cease to amaze me.... |  |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 23:21 - Mar 3 with 608 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 21:49 - Mar 3 by Nthsuffolkblue |
To be fair they showed his heat map and there was one bit of the pitch on the right side that he didn't cover. |
Yup, he was clearly slacking this evening 
 |  | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 23:51 - Mar 3 with 547 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 22:55 - Mar 3 by Dubtractor |
I thought he struggled to really impact the game, by his usual standards, so you're not alone in fairness Wally.
Was a pretty remarkably bad cameo from Neil too, if I'm honest.
But an excellent overall performance and win against a horribly stubborn team. |
Agree with this re Clarke and Neil.
Plus feel sorry for Egeli - just not working with him in the team at the moment |  | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 23:52 - Mar 3 with 542 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 23:31 - Mar 3 by FrimleyBlue |
Why does amount of running declare how good a performance was?
He had 1 successful dribble out of 7 ( based on the same stat site you used
6/13 ground duals won
4 passes into the final third
For all that running
1 tackle
2 recoveries
I completely agree he ran around a lot. Hull also had a good shape about them.
But I dont honestly see what was impressive about tonight other than a good amount of running.
And in no way should you not hit this into the bottom or even top corner
And then hits the post. The first shot i think he hits it with the side of his left heel
So the first one was a sitter. Even the 2nd one was more of a sitter as the keeper was on the floor
Really dont want this to sound boo hiss etc its reallt not meant too. Just dont see what some others have tonight [Post edited 3 Mar 23:45]
|
I was responding to the comments about being everywhere. But, …
Having said that, do you even analyse the stats you pick out? 66 touches was amongst the highest for the forward looking players (the touches for the backs isn’t relevant, since it is inflated by knocking it back and forth between themselves when trying to draw the press).
Matusiwa was also 66 touches. Nunez 64 (but per 90 slightly better, as he played 16 mins less).
Did everything Jack tried come off tonight? No, it wasn’t his most productive. Was his the poorest performance (the OP’s title). Absolutely not!!!
I’ll also take an independent site’s assessment of him over unconsciously biased fans. Second highest rating, just behind Azor. | | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:00 - Mar 4 with 525 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 23:52 - Mar 3 by SuffolkPunchFC |
I was responding to the comments about being everywhere. But, …
Having said that, do you even analyse the stats you pick out? 66 touches was amongst the highest for the forward looking players (the touches for the backs isn’t relevant, since it is inflated by knocking it back and forth between themselves when trying to draw the press).
Matusiwa was also 66 touches. Nunez 64 (but per 90 slightly better, as he played 16 mins less).
Did everything Jack tried come off tonight? No, it wasn’t his most productive. Was his the poorest performance (the OP’s title). Absolutely not!!!
I’ll also take an independent site’s assessment of him over unconsciously biased fans. Second highest rating, just behind Azor. |
Not sure what your point is? He played 90 minutes. Was clearly in a lot of different places and received the ball alot which is normal for our left sided players.. sorry if im misunderstanding something but I dont get what that highlights. Isn't it normal?
I dont know how they do the ratings. The 7.8 doesnt make sense with such lower numbers in regards to other stats shown.. they do have him down as two missed chances plus hitting the woodwork. Not sure if that boosts it up. |  |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:01 - Mar 4 with 525 views | tetchris |
Clarke has been one of our better players this season, penalty taker, creator, and highest goal scorer. One slightly below par match is forgiven. He runs around a lot and goes on mazy runs and tries to take on players but sometimes with no end product. | | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:01 - Mar 4 with 525 views | mrshallisfit |
King of the Mongs right here. To beat your most divvie posts by one even more divvie takes some doing. Give yourself a biscuit. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:07 - Mar 4 with 515 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:01 - Mar 4 by mrshallisfit |
King of the Mongs right here. To beat your most divvie posts by one even more divvie takes some doing. Give yourself a biscuit. |
Interesting comments on my post (yours aside).
Seems a lot are in agreement.
Clearly not at his best tonight, but everyone is allowed an off game! | |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:12 - Mar 4 with 505 views | armchaircritic59 |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 21:47 - Mar 3 by MrPotatoHead |
No need for that. He worked very hard and carried the ball well at times. Philogene is better though. |
JP better? he's barely yet to turn up away from home, and if he doesn't get back soon he won't be getting many chances to put that right this season. That's another thing, could be becoming injury prone. I know who I'd choose between the two. | | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:20 - Mar 4 with 492 views | Wallingford_Boy |
TWTD ratings back me up too.
Always knew you lot knew your football. | |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:41 - Mar 4 with 472 views | RedX |
I thought he played very well(again) and was delighted he wasn’t taken off. |  | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 02:58 - Mar 4 with 409 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Just heard the guy on Blue Monday say Clarke couldn’t do anything more with that chance!
WHAT? Literally has to score, went with the wrong foot and put it the only place the keeper could save it. If Hull nicked a point I’d have been fuming with that miss in the context of the game where chances are very sparse. However, they didn’t, job done, solid and needed win.
Clarke is a top ball carrier causes defenses to worry and obviously has a goal in him, has grabbed us a few crucial points from the spot as well. I do think I prefer him as a sub at home though, with Philogene out I’d like to see Davis and Mehmeti again down the left.
Clarke’s had a very good season but did have a few moments of frustration tonight. Assume the downvotes are for the singling him out, when he wasn’t terrible just frustrating at times. Sometimes he just needs to let it fly or give the ball a second earlier, he had a decent sight at goal at Wrexham at 3-2 that springs to mind. [Post edited 4 Mar 3:00]
|  |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 06:54 - Mar 4 with 354 views | RichOBlue |
He was considerably better than Egeli |  |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 09:21 - Mar 4 with 281 views | swede |
Did you actually notice that he had 2-3 defenders on him every time he received the ball? | | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:34 - Mar 4 with 208 views | cressi |
Disagree yes at times he should have released the ball quicker and occasionally choose the wrong ball, but overall played OK and worked his socks off. | | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:40 - Mar 4 with 200 views | GlasgowBlue |
Looks like we have a new scapegoat. Quite remarkable considering he's our leading goal scorer. |  |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:52 - Mar 4 with 181 views | Wright1 |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 21:46 - Mar 3 by John_Warks_Willy |
I thought Clarke was great, but you’re not the first person to say that.
Funny old game innit [Post edited 3 Mar 21:52]
|
His performance was a strange one to assess in my opinion. In the first half in particular he was our brightest attacker - positive and always on the ball. At the same time, it felt like one of those games where nothing quite came off for him to me. He probably wasn't helped by not having Leif to open up space or combine with him. | | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:53 - Mar 4 with 178 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:40 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
Looks like we have a new scapegoat. Quite remarkable considering he's our leading goal scorer. |
Or simply a Player last night who has split the fans in regards to his level of performance.
Does it change his goalscoring stats no
Like oshea v wrexham. He had a bad game. Doesn't mean hes overall not a good player
Why has football changed so much that any critique of any player is met with the word scapegoat. | |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:56 - Mar 4 with 172 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:53 - Mar 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Or simply a Player last night who has split the fans in regards to his level of performance.
Does it change his goalscoring stats no
Like oshea v wrexham. He had a bad game. Doesn't mean hes overall not a good player
Why has football changed so much that any critique of any player is met with the word scapegoat. |
I just find it odd that after a victory against a promotion rival, people are looking to single out a player for criticism. | |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 13:01 - Mar 4 with 166 views | DJR |
My view is that Clarke has been our best attacking player overall this season, just shading it ahead of Philogene.
And whilst he wasn't maybe so effective in the first half, the game changed and opened up in the second half in my view largely due to him. |  | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 13:02 - Mar 4 with 163 views | MattinLondon |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 00:01 - Mar 4 by mrshallisfit |
King of the Mongs right here. To beat your most divvie posts by one even more divvie takes some doing. Give yourself a biscuit. |
Mongs! Really?
Some comments are best left in the 80s. |  | | |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 13:08 - Mar 4 with 149 views | RamRob |
Clarke had a good game, other than one dubious moment.
I can forgive him not releasing passes and trying to do too much and losing the ball in attack, and he should have scored that big chance, but keeper did well. He has had a great season and those things happen from time to time.
What I didn't like was him having the chance to clear the ball out of defence near the end, but decided to dribble across the 18 yard box instead... What was he thinking?! |  |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 13:18 - Mar 4 with 133 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 12:56 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
I just find it odd that after a victory against a promotion rival, people are looking to single out a player for criticism. |
But thats football.
If you lose a game people mention the positives. If you win people will mention both too. | |
| |
| Clarke aside, that’s a great team performance! on 13:20 - Mar 4 with 130 views | bartyg |
Just unnecessary stipulation to make. Sure he could've done better with his chance but he gave a solid performance otherwise (and better than some others).
Getting some rightful downvotes with this one. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
