Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. 18:00 - Feb 9 with 3752 viewsSitfcB

[Post edited 9 Feb 2021 18:00]

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:01 - Feb 9 with 2637 viewsMrTown

Looks like a diamond. One of the formations most dependable on attacking full backs - he’s put 2 35 year olds in.

Poll: Would love to know the opinions on here now of Lambert genuinely?

5
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:01 - Feb 9 with 2610 viewsBlueBadger

Still, I suppose he's being consistent and showing he doesn't trust other people's young players as well as our own.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Where would it be funniest to see NCFC fans crying on the telly?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:02 - Feb 9 with 2562 viewsWestover

Surprise surprise 😱😬
0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:02 - Feb 9 with 2552 viewsRadlett_blue

Grrr!
Lambert out!

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:02 - Feb 9 with 2548 viewsStadiumofdark

TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:01 - Feb 9 by MrTown

Looks like a diamond. One of the formations most dependable on attacking full backs - he’s put 2 35 year olds in.


Chambers up top, judge in goal, and Ward box to box mid
0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:03 - Feb 9 with 2522 viewsBlueBadger

No pace out wide and two forwards who like a cross or two.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Where would it be funniest to see NCFC fans crying on the telly?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:03 - Feb 9 with 2530 viewsFixed_It

Narrow. Very narrow.

Ready! Steady! Cook!
Poll: Club v. Country - which comes first for you?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:03 - Feb 9 with 2518 viewsC_HealyIsAPleasure

Hahaha

Highlighting crass stupidity since sometime around 2010
Poll: Would you want Messi to sign?

1
Login to get fewer ads

TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:03 - Feb 9 with 2515 viewstownblue

Wtaf
0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:03 - Feb 9 with 2475 viewscatch74

TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:01 - Feb 9 by MrTown

Looks like a diamond. One of the formations most dependable on attacking full backs - he’s put 2 35 year olds in.


Don’t discount Judge and Parrott out wide, where they’ll be best wasted.
Thomas not even on the bench!!

Poll: Who are the Numbskulls?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:03 - Feb 9 with 2463 viewsBryanPlug

[content removed at owner's request]

Poll: What should the status of a turntable lid be when playing records?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:05 - Feb 9 with 2381 viewsLankHenners

So it's either a very narrow formation with pensioners at full back or he's got at least 2 players out of position. Great stuff Paul.

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Poll: What is Celina's problem?

1
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:05 - Feb 9 with 2366 viewsGlasgowBlue

FFS. One step forward and then two back. There goes our fresh pace down the flanks from full back.

Iron Lion Zion
Poll: Our best central defensive partnership?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:06 - Feb 9 with 2310 viewsSwansea_Blue

Yep, you couldn't possibly ask younger players to play two games in 3 days whereas apparently that's perfectly fine for 35+ year olds.

I think Parrott makes a bigger impact than either of those fullback changes though, so all is not lost!

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:06 - Feb 9 with 2261 viewsmonytowbray

Why do we get to this point with every f'ing manager?!

TWTD never forgets…
Poll: How close will a TWTD election poll be next to June results?

2
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:07 - Feb 9 with 2250 viewsfootball89

Should of kept it to a max 2 changes,

Kept the backline from Saturday, try build some consistency. This looks like a defeat before we even kick off.
0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:08 - Feb 9 with 2212 viewsRomeo4

On first viewing it looked like we might’ve been playing with 2 up front. However with no natural width in the team I expect that means he’s playing Parrott and Judge wide. Ugh!!
1
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:08 - Feb 9 with 2197 viewshatch

Looks like we're expecting an aerial bombardment but I'm not sure that's how Posh play? Leaving our creativity on the bench suggests we throwing Saturday's tactics out the window in favour of tonight's conditions. Brave.
0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:08 - Feb 9 with 2196 viewsDarth_Koont

Not too concerned about Chambers and award coming back as I guess we’ll be defending more tonight.

The players ahead look narrow but purely depends on where they are going to play.

Pronouns: He/Him

1
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:08 - Feb 9 with 2187 viewsWestover

No Thomas in the squad another injury?
0
I actually get SOME of those changes (for a change!) on 18:10 - Feb 9 with 2126 viewsunstableblue

Tonight is going to be grim on that surface... its going to be a battle (see Lee Bowyer comments on the surface).

Matheson was much better second half when he moved onto the better Ipswich pitch wing.

You need experience in games like this. Ward and Chambo give that, and its a chance for them to make up for poor recent form.

Flynn stays which is good, and Teddy and Dozzell more advanced.

Also this kind of game suits Norwood, and he's looking sharper.

WHAT I DON'T agree with is this - IF YOU'RE PLAYING DEEPER SET FULL BACKS, you need more dynamic wide men, Judge is slow and was better in the number 8, than wide. Parrot was also doing well down the middle. Edwards would be better.

Anyway lets see how it goes - but certainly that is not a WTAF selection as some suggest. Matheson and Kenlock no doubt back for Shrews - well lets hope so.

But let me repeat - tonight's surface is going to be a nightmare.

Poll: How many points will Town get from 5 (Wat, Boro, Hull, Cov, Hudd)?

-4
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:11 - Feb 9 with 2089 viewsjayessess

wtf is this?

Blog: What Now? Taking a Look at Life in League One

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:11 - Feb 9 with 2071 viewsStowTractorBoy

That line up just does not make sense to me. Matheson brilliant on Saturday and he is left out. Two excellent attacking wing backs and replaces them with the oldies on a mud bound pitch. I really do despair. Don't get me wrong I want all that wear the shirt on the day to do well but that line up is a worry to me. Really hope I am proved wrong.
0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:11 - Feb 9 with 2070 viewsunstableblue

TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:08 - Feb 9 by Darth_Koont

Not too concerned about Chambers and award coming back as I guess we’ll be defending more tonight.

The players ahead look narrow but purely depends on where they are going to play.


Totally agree Darth.

Full backs I'm OK with; width doesn't look right, although we haven't seen Parrot out wide beforeand that's where he was playing (apparently ineffectively) at Millwall

Poll: How many points will Town get from 5 (Wat, Boro, Hull, Cov, Hudd)?

0
TEAM: Four changes. Old boys back. on 18:12 - Feb 9 with 2060 viewsJ2BLUE

Imagine being Matheson. You come in full of energy and enthusiasm, get lots of plaudits on your debut then you get rested after one game.

I'm sure the pitch will be the excuse but ffs.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024