| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then 11:09 - May 28 with 9197 views | chrismakin |
|  |
| |  |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:10 - May 28 with 5125 views | Keno |
pah, it was def info on here so must have been right!!
I actually suspect it was a ploy by his agent to get a better deal out of Luton |  |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:10 - May 28 with 5122 views | tractorboy1978 |
He's being economical with the truth there. |  | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:15 - May 28 with 5066 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
Whether its true or not, he's hardly going to say 'yeah I was about to sign for Ipswich but luton offered me more money'.
Footballers often tell fans what they want to hear. |  | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:17 - May 28 with 5029 views | Metal_Hacker |
What's that smell ? |  |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:18 - May 28 with 5019 views | chrismakin |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:15 - May 28 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Whether its true or not, he's hardly going to say 'yeah I was about to sign for Ipswich but luton offered me more money'.
Footballers often tell fans what they want to hear. |
IF he had spoke with us, it would be easier for him to say " Yeah as a player out of contract there was interest, I spoke with Ipswich however Luton where i'd rather be " he'd had gained even more respect from luton fans for turning us down..
I don't see why you'd lie about talking to us when it would be very easy for town/PC to counter that at any point, he'd look like a right twt.
I agree with another poster on this thread, agent at work.... | |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:21 - May 28 with 4971 views | tractorboy1978 |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:18 - May 28 by chrismakin |
IF he had spoke with us, it would be easier for him to say " Yeah as a player out of contract there was interest, I spoke with Ipswich however Luton where i'd rather be " he'd had gained even more respect from luton fans for turning us down..
I don't see why you'd lie about talking to us when it would be very easy for town/PC to counter that at any point, he'd look like a right twt.
I agree with another poster on this thread, agent at work.... |
Watson (and assume Phil too) verified it with numerous different sources before going to print. ITFC definitely thought they were close to it being done, whether in his own head that was ever the case or not. [Post edited 28 May 2021 11:23]
| | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:23 - May 28 with 4941 views | hype313 |
Course they did... |  |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:33 - May 28 with 4818 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:18 - May 28 by chrismakin |
IF he had spoke with us, it would be easier for him to say " Yeah as a player out of contract there was interest, I spoke with Ipswich however Luton where i'd rather be " he'd had gained even more respect from luton fans for turning us down..
I don't see why you'd lie about talking to us when it would be very easy for town/PC to counter that at any point, he'd look like a right twt.
I agree with another poster on this thread, agent at work.... |
Watson wouldn't have run the story if it was rubbish. As Phil said, he changed his mind because he wanted to stay in the championship and I suspect Luton could offer more money after selling a couple of their players. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:39 - May 28 with 4757 views | chrismakin |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:33 - May 28 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Watson wouldn't have run the story if it was rubbish. As Phil said, he changed his mind because he wanted to stay in the championship and I suspect Luton could offer more money after selling a couple of their players. |
They can run any story if they feel they have info good enough to post... albeit It could be based on Agent talk.. Bradley could well be telling the truth, at no point did he personally speak with town.
Appreciate the work the papers do etc, but they're not always spot on, and there's plent of 'sources' that have been wrong. Even remember your 'Connoly at the club' was looked into by sources who said no he wasn't - yet you were comfortable that he was... | |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:43 - May 28 with 4733 views | ArnieM |
I said last week, players agents will use ITFC and our new found wealth to their advantage when negotiating new deals for their players. |  |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:51 - May 28 with 4653 views | BlueBlueBluex2 |
EXACTLY as a I stated.
You simply cannot believe everything that you read. Websites are there to obtain your visits and will benefit from not even clicking on an advert but by the amount of times it displays on a visitors screen. | | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:54 - May 28 with 4610 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:33 - May 28 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Watson wouldn't have run the story if it was rubbish. As Phil said, he changed his mind because he wanted to stay in the championship and I suspect Luton could offer more money after selling a couple of their players. |
Watson's made mistakes before, as has Phil. Bradley has no need to even mention Ipswich... he could just say there were other offers but I chose to stay here.
I think he's telling the truth and it was the agent stirring things up to get a better deal. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:55 - May 28 with 4593 views | chrismakin |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:54 - May 28 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Watson's made mistakes before, as has Phil. Bradley has no need to even mention Ipswich... he could just say there were other offers but I chose to stay here.
I think he's telling the truth and it was the agent stirring things up to get a better deal. |
Ipswich are an Agents dream this summer | |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:59 - May 28 with 4529 views | jayessess |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:54 - May 28 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Watson's made mistakes before, as has Phil. Bradley has no need to even mention Ipswich... he could just say there were other offers but I chose to stay here.
I think he's telling the truth and it was the agent stirring things up to get a better deal. |
Bradley's got a very obvious motivation to pretend he never considered leaving, hasn't he? |  |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:05 - May 28 with 4473 views | PhilTWTD |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:15 - May 28 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Whether its true or not, he's hardly going to say 'yeah I was about to sign for Ipswich but luton offered me more money'.
Footballers often tell fans what they want to hear. |
Indeed, although I gather money wasn't the issue but Championship football. |  | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:07 - May 28 with 4455 views | PhilTWTD |
There are a lot of links flying about currently which have nothing in them, but that isn't one of them. | | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:10 - May 28 with 4402 views | chrismakin |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:07 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
There are a lot of links flying about currently which have nothing in them, but that isn't one of them. |
Agree, but there is a difference between something in it with the player in question to speaking alot with the agent of said player and agent lets local papers know about it lol
He may be saving face, but I can't see it knowing the club could just counter him at any point. | |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:19 - May 28 with 4223 views | norfsufblue |
Who cares..he plays for Luton... move on! |  | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:19 - May 28 with 4219 views | J2BLUE |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:10 - May 28 by chrismakin |
Agree, but there is a difference between something in it with the player in question to speaking alot with the agent of said player and agent lets local papers know about it lol
He may be saving face, but I can't see it knowing the club could just counter him at any point. |
Why would the club out him?
It would say to anyone in similar situations that we can't be trusted if they decided to stay with their current club. There's nothing to gain saying actually he was close to coming here. It puts him in an awkward situation and starts a whole thing off about the eventual CB signing not being our first choice. |  |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:23 - May 28 with 4185 views | PhilTWTD |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:10 - May 28 by chrismakin |
Agree, but there is a difference between something in it with the player in question to speaking alot with the agent of said player and agent lets local papers know about it lol
He may be saving face, but I can't see it knowing the club could just counter him at any point. |
My source on it wasn't the agent. Was definitely something in it and there was the expectation he was moving on at both ends. | | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:24 - May 28 with 4157 views | blueoxford |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:19 - May 28 by J2BLUE |
Why would the club out him?
It would say to anyone in similar situations that we can't be trusted if they decided to stay with their current club. There's nothing to gain saying actually he was close to coming here. It puts him in an awkward situation and starts a whole thing off about the eventual CB signing not being our first choice. |
We are going to be used by a lot of agents this summer to get better contracts for their clients even if they stay with their existing clubs | | | |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:29 - May 28 with 4103 views | chrismakin |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:19 - May 28 by J2BLUE |
Why would the club out him?
It would say to anyone in similar situations that we can't be trusted if they decided to stay with their current club. There's nothing to gain saying actually he was close to coming here. It puts him in an awkward situation and starts a whole thing off about the eventual CB signing not being our first choice. |
Not out him on purpose, I 've seen before the press asking a manager about players who were 'close' to joining or what do you think of .... " Great player, nearly signed him last in the summer etc etc
something similar to that.
It's not a major thing of course, I just think Bradley would be daft to lie about it. As mentioned above he doesn't himself need to say he was close to joining, but could have easily have said, spoke with, turned out. the end. | |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:37 - May 28 with 4031 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 11:59 - May 28 by jayessess |
Bradley's got a very obvious motivation to pretend he never considered leaving, hasn't he? |
Yep. Or he's actually telling the truth and didn't. Like I say, he could pretend without even mentioning Ipswich. The fact that he's come out and said so much in so much detail suggests he's telling the truth to me. The best way to lie is to keep it simple. By mentioning Ipswich he invites Ipswich to come back and say, well you're talking porkies mate! Just no need. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:45 - May 28 with 3972 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:23 - May 28 by PhilTWTD |
My source on it wasn't the agent. Was definitely something in it and there was the expectation he was moving on at both ends. |
But couldn't your source have got it via a rumour put out by the agent?
If he's lying it seems odd to go into so much detail. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:57 - May 28 with 3854 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| So bradley... we weren't even in for him then on 12:10 - May 28 by chrismakin |
Agree, but there is a difference between something in it with the player in question to speaking alot with the agent of said player and agent lets local papers know about it lol
He may be saving face, but I can't see it knowing the club could just counter him at any point. |
its really not an issue
just ignore speculation
i would hope the club didnt waste time countering speculation either |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
