| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea 22:25 - Jun 25 with 7545 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
According to The Mirror |  | | |  |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:48 - Jun 25 with 964 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:28 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Thanks for providing the missing context.
If we’d have stayed in the PL then I’d have agreed with you but the relegation and his subsequent wage drop will lower his value purely because he will want to move and we simply can’t afford to compete with PL clubs on wages.
The past few seasons have shown that relegated clubs will lose their better players for lower than market value as a result of this scenario. |
"The past few seasons have shown that relegated clubs will lose their better players for lower than market value as a result of this scenario."
Can you give a couple of examples please? |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 00:04 - Jun 26 with 940 views | The_Romford_Blue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:01 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Because we no longer hold the cards. If he wants to go then he will and for market value. We will add a sell on but in the short term we will take a loss. That’s the reality of modern football. |
Mate.. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 00:33 - Jun 26 with 888 views | Churchman |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:01 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Because we no longer hold the cards. If he wants to go then he will and for market value. We will add a sell on but in the short term we will take a loss. That’s the reality of modern football. |
I think you need to add that ITFC is in firesale mode. The owners want to recoup some of their disastrous losses before they sell the club back to Evans for £1, even if it means taking a £5m hit on a player under contract.
The club will be charged for breaching FFP rules by Friday and the CEO is crying a lot, not least because if it appears in the Mirror we all know it’s true. They’ve never lied or written rubbish ever. The paper in the know.
Booooooooo! I suggest you contact the CEO for an explanation of this chaos right now. We need an explanation.
Well, if we are going to have to endure this, we may as well add a little embellishment to it and make it more colourful. |  | | |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 02:23 - Jun 26 with 829 views | SitfcB |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:01 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Because we no longer hold the cards. If he wants to go then he will and for market value. We will add a sell on but in the short term we will take a loss. That’s the reality of modern football. |
Thick as mince. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 04:11 - Jun 26 with 816 views | Illinoisblue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:08 - Jun 25 by Trequartista |
A lot of messenger shooting here. The op is just stating what the Mirror have written. |
When messengers completely and utterly misrepresent what was written then surely they should be metaphorically shot? “Stand down in the trenches, lads, the Germans aren’t advancing.” Oh. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:03 - Jun 26 with 691 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:28 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Thanks for providing the missing context.
If we’d have stayed in the PL then I’d have agreed with you but the relegation and his subsequent wage drop will lower his value purely because he will want to move and we simply can’t afford to compete with PL clubs on wages.
The past few seasons have shown that relegated clubs will lose their better players for lower than market value as a result of this scenario. |
"relegation and his subsequent wage drop will lower his value purely because he will want to move and we simply can’t afford to compete with PL clubs on wages"
Remind us again how relegation based release clauses work? |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:16 - Jun 26 with 667 views | Axeldalai_lama |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:01 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Because we no longer hold the cards. If he wants to go then he will and for market value. We will add a sell on but in the short term we will take a loss. That’s the reality of modern football. |
Not the best source admittedly, but this is the reality of modern football:
https://www.footballfancast.com/football-efl-championship-most-expensive-biggest
15 players sold for over £25 million from championship teams to the prem. |  | | |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:18 - Jun 26 with 662 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:03 - Jun 26 by Cheltenham_Blue |
"relegation and his subsequent wage drop will lower his value purely because he will want to move and we simply can’t afford to compete with PL clubs on wages"
Remind us again how relegation based release clauses work? |
You’re right, I forgot about that. Clubs will obviously overpay to the tune on 16 million because there’s a clause. Yippee!
Remember when everyone thought we’d be getting 60 million for Delap and Burgess wasn’t going anywhere? 😂 | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:30 - Jun 26 with 626 views | NthQldITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:01 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Because we no longer hold the cards. If he wants to go then he will and for market value. We will add a sell on but in the short term we will take a loss. That’s the reality of modern football. |
I've come to the conclusion that some people are just weird. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:34 - Jun 26 with 597 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:18 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
You’re right, I forgot about that. Clubs will obviously overpay to the tune on 16 million because there’s a clause. Yippee!
Remember when everyone thought we’d be getting 60 million for Delap and Burgess wasn’t going anywhere? 😂 |
Are you ok?
Oh, and we didn't get £60m for Delap, because there was a clause for £30m.
Why oh why didn't Chelsea just give us a packet of Cheeto's? [Post edited 26 Jun 7:38]
| |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:35 - Jun 26 with 598 views | NthQldITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 23:28 - Jun 25 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Thanks for providing the missing context.
If we’d have stayed in the PL then I’d have agreed with you but the relegation and his subsequent wage drop will lower his value purely because he will want to move and we simply can’t afford to compete with PL clubs on wages.
The past few seasons have shown that relegated clubs will lose their better players for lower than market value as a result of this scenario. |
You can't possibly believe this, no-one is that ill-informed, so are you just on some sort of wind-up? This is a genuine question. I don't understand what you're doing. I'm assuming you are a genuine fan because not even the thickest Norwich troll would go for this. | |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:40 - Jun 26 with 567 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:35 - Jun 26 by NthQldITFC |
You can't possibly believe this, no-one is that ill-informed, so are you just on some sort of wind-up? This is a genuine question. I don't understand what you're doing. I'm assuming you are a genuine fan because not even the thickest Norwich troll would go for this. |
That a player would want to leave and earn a higher wage or that a player is worth less in the Championship than the PL?
But yes, I honestly believe both statements and find it odd that you wouldn’t. This from the same people that Delap should just sign a new contract without a release clause because he somehow owed us something. | | | |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:59 - Jun 26 with 499 views | Dubtractor |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:40 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
That a player would want to leave and earn a higher wage or that a player is worth less in the Championship than the PL?
But yes, I honestly believe both statements and find it odd that you wouldn’t. This from the same people that Delap should just sign a new contract without a release clause because he somehow owed us something. |
Literally no one said or thought that about delap.
You're either a troll or a fool. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:01 - Jun 26 with 487 views | Plums |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:18 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
You’re right, I forgot about that. Clubs will obviously overpay to the tune on 16 million because there’s a clause. Yippee!
Remember when everyone thought we’d be getting 60 million for Delap and Burgess wasn’t going anywhere? 😂 |
You do realise a 'clause' is a legally binding part of a contract don't you?
It's not that they will 'obviously overpay', they will have to meet that valuation otherwise there is no deal happening. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:02 - Jun 26 with 486 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:59 - Jun 26 by Dubtractor |
Literally no one said or thought that about delap.
You're either a troll or a fool. |
Offer delap new contract? by hunty21 9 Apr 17:39Never know he may want to stay with increased wages and clauses although I'm sure his agent will be in his ear saying otherwise it's worth a try
One of many posts where it was suggested. You can’t rewrite history when it’s indexed in Google. | | | |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:04 - Jun 26 with 461 views | bournemouthblue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:40 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
That a player would want to leave and earn a higher wage or that a player is worth less in the Championship than the PL?
But yes, I honestly believe both statements and find it odd that you wouldn’t. This from the same people that Delap should just sign a new contract without a release clause because he somehow owed us something. |
Why would the club sell a hot prospect for less than they paid for them, that would make no sense at all
If the release clause is indeed £35 million, that is what we will sell him for, it's as simple as that |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:06 - Jun 26 with 449 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:02 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Offer delap new contract? by hunty21 9 Apr 17:39Never know he may want to stay with increased wages and clauses although I'm sure his agent will be in his ear saying otherwise it's worth a try
One of many posts where it was suggested. You can’t rewrite history when it’s indexed in Google. |
Many posts? There's a spectacular attempt at Whataboutery going on here.
Which really isn't going to distract from the fact you honestly believe clubs don't need to meet his release clause, the one that Hutchinson himself would have asked to be included. [Post edited 26 Jun 8:08]
| |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:07 - Jun 26 with 447 views | StokieBlue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:40 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
That a player would want to leave and earn a higher wage or that a player is worth less in the Championship than the PL?
But yes, I honestly believe both statements and find it odd that you wouldn’t. This from the same people that Delap should just sign a new contract without a release clause because he somehow owed us something. |
I assume you're on a massive troll but just in case:
- It's not up to the player unless the release clause is met which it was in Delap's case.
- A player may be worth less but the club don't have to accept less.
- No club is going to take a 7m+ loss on a player they still want when they contractually don't have to.
So in reality nothing has changed with relegation, if a club wants Hutch they pay 35m or we can simply say no.
As for your transfer valuation source, least said about that the better.
SB |  | | |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:07 - Jun 26 with 444 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:01 - Jun 26 by Plums |
You do realise a 'clause' is a legally binding part of a contract don't you?
It's not that they will 'obviously overpay', they will have to meet that valuation otherwise there is no deal happening. |
That’s not quite right I’m afraid. If he was worth more than the clause and someone offered the clause then we’d have to accept. We are perfectly within our rights to accept a lower amount and given that he’s worth considerably less than the clause amount we are very unlikely to achieve it.
You’ll say “haha but then we won’t sell!”, but we will. Because there’s little point holding on to a player that wants to leave if you can get a reasonable fee. With a decent U21 Euros and a decent PL season in 25/26 he has an outside shot at a WC squad place, we won’t hold him back and neither should we. | | | |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:09 - Jun 26 with 431 views | Dubtractor |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:02 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Offer delap new contract? by hunty21 9 Apr 17:39Never know he may want to stay with increased wages and clauses although I'm sure his agent will be in his ear saying otherwise it's worth a try
One of many posts where it was suggested. You can’t rewrite history when it’s indexed in Google. |
If it's one of many, share some more please.
And if it's 'the same people who said' that about Delap, I'm sure many of those posts will be from the same people posting in this thread.
Omari will most likely leave this summer, but it won't be for 19m, or a number nearly as low as that. | |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:10 - Jun 26 with 423 views | Plums |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:07 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
That’s not quite right I’m afraid. If he was worth more than the clause and someone offered the clause then we’d have to accept. We are perfectly within our rights to accept a lower amount and given that he’s worth considerably less than the clause amount we are very unlikely to achieve it.
You’ll say “haha but then we won’t sell!”, but we will. Because there’s little point holding on to a player that wants to leave if you can get a reasonable fee. With a decent U21 Euros and a decent PL season in 25/26 he has an outside shot at a WC squad place, we won’t hold him back and neither should we. |
Haha but then we won't sell! | |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:11 - Jun 26 with 411 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:07 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
That’s not quite right I’m afraid. If he was worth more than the clause and someone offered the clause then we’d have to accept. We are perfectly within our rights to accept a lower amount and given that he’s worth considerably less than the clause amount we are very unlikely to achieve it.
You’ll say “haha but then we won’t sell!”, but we will. Because there’s little point holding on to a player that wants to leave if you can get a reasonable fee. With a decent U21 Euros and a decent PL season in 25/26 he has an outside shot at a WC squad place, we won’t hold him back and neither should we. |
 | |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:16 - Jun 26 with 373 views | Herbivore |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 07:18 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
You’re right, I forgot about that. Clubs will obviously overpay to the tune on 16 million because there’s a clause. Yippee!
Remember when everyone thought we’d be getting 60 million for Delap and Burgess wasn’t going anywhere? 😂 |
Doubling down here is a really bad look. You honestly think we're going to sell Hutchinson at a loss because a website rates his market value at £19m so that's all anyone will pay? Those sites are notorious for undervaluing players versus what they actually end up being sold for and we are not compelled to just accept any offer that is made for Omari. I will happily bet you a grand that we don't sell Hutchinson at a loss. You seem very confident so I'm sure you'll take that bet. |  |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:19 - Jun 26 with 355 views | Herbivore |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:07 - Jun 26 by SimonBatfordITFC |
That’s not quite right I’m afraid. If he was worth more than the clause and someone offered the clause then we’d have to accept. We are perfectly within our rights to accept a lower amount and given that he’s worth considerably less than the clause amount we are very unlikely to achieve it.
You’ll say “haha but then we won’t sell!”, but we will. Because there’s little point holding on to a player that wants to leave if you can get a reasonable fee. With a decent U21 Euros and a decent PL season in 25/26 he has an outside shot at a WC squad place, we won’t hold him back and neither should we. |
Jesus wept. Absolute sh!twittery. | |
| |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:20 - Jun 26 with 351 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
| Omari off for 19m with 25% going to Chelsea on 08:09 - Jun 26 by Dubtractor |
If it's one of many, share some more please.
And if it's 'the same people who said' that about Delap, I'm sure many of those posts will be from the same people posting in this thread.
Omari will most likely leave this summer, but it won't be for 19m, or a number nearly as low as that. |
Liam Delap new contract before Christmas? by RIPbobby 30 Nov 2024 13:25I wonder how hard the club are going to try to maximise his resale value. I know he has only just signed for us, but he has such a great start that it would be prudent to up his wages and also get his buy out clause much higher than it is right now. I would imagine his market value is north of 60 million already.
Just a thought.
Delap... by Jack27 15 Apr 12:50Something that I don't think has been mentioned about the Delap release clause...
Yes - Man City could exercise their supposed £40m buyback and sell him on OR we could lose him for £30m once relegated...
BUT (and this might be naive what with the ruthlessness of football)
Is there a possibility Delap could sign a new contract with us to remove the clause? I only say it because (and this could be the naive part) Ipswich signed him and helped him be the player he is. He might feel he owes it to the club to repay that by signing the contract to remove it, still with an agreement to sell to a Premier League team, but without a clause stipulating the amount.
Delap relegation release clause by Jon_456 11 Apr 20:58I’m normally quite critical of young footballers seeking moves too soon when they’re probably better of playing more games in the league below.
However in this instance I think it would be an absolute waste of talent if he were to spend next season in the championship. He’s every bit a premier league footballer and should be eyeing up an England call up next year.
Literally 3 of the top 4 results on Google. Many more. Still think “nobody said that”? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
