| Wet Spam or Spuds…? 15:23 - May 7 with 2302 views | witchdoctor | who do you want to go down?..the obvious answer is the Spammers and their godawful soulless dump of a ground…but on the other hand is it Spuds if only for the lols? [Post edited 7 May 19:02]
|  | | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:24 - May 7 with 1736 views | Kropotkin123 | Spurs, to highlight how ridiculous the breakaway league was. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:29 - May 7 with 1697 views | urbanpenguin | Spurs. Either would be fun, but as a reminder to the "big clubs" that football is a broader sport than just them, that they need to build a system that supports all not just a few, and to remind them that for the grace of god they can all go down, it would be useful for it to be Spurs. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:58 - May 7 with 1562 views | Bobbychase | West Ham. Horrible experience as an away fan, in a stadium they essentially were given. Hideous owner - Sullivan - and some of their fanbase too. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:58 - May 7 with 1562 views | MattinLondon | Spurs being relegated will be funny but I’m guessing that quite a few administrative staff are currently very worried about their jobs if they do go down. Let’s face it, it won’t be the players that will face that burden. Think West Ham will however go down - be interesting to see their stadium in the championship in terms of how empty it may become. [Post edited 7 May 15:59]
|  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:05 - May 7 with 1502 views | Ryorry | Spuds, would be funny - plenty of punning opportunites as well ... |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:06 - May 7 with 1490 views | Dubtractor | I think it is what is known as a win win situation. Will be funny whichever of them goes. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:12 - May 7 with 1460 views | Blueschev |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:06 - May 7 by Dubtractor | I think it is what is known as a win win situation. Will be funny whichever of them goes. |
I dislike West ham more than Norwich, so I'd be delighted if they go down. Having said that Spurs going down would be hilarious, so as you say, win win. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:12 - May 7 with 1462 views | hoppy | Don't really mind which - shame they can't both go. That said, I think of the two teams struggling, West Ham are more likely to continue struggling than Spurs who I would imagine would sort themselves out better for next season if they stay up. [Post edited 7 May 16:17]
|  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:14 - May 7 with 1450 views | football | Spuds just because it would be funnier as they haven't been in the second tier and spam have. But seeing Spams awful souls ground with those stupid bubbles empty next season would be funny. As others have said, win win [Post edited 7 May 16:15]
|  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:38 - May 7 with 1368 views | Steve_M | Spurs would be the funniest one, but I can take a lot of solace from it being West Ham too. I'm enjoying seeing the prevailing mood in this thread. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:39 - May 7 with 1358 views | Swansea_Blue | West Ham by a country mile. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:44 - May 7 with 1343 views | CaptainAhab | West Ham would be funny, but Spurs would be funny as fck |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:09 - May 7 with 1241 views | EastTownBlue |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:14 - May 7 by football | Spuds just because it would be funnier as they haven't been in the second tier and spam have. But seeing Spams awful souls ground with those stupid bubbles empty next season would be funny. As others have said, win win [Post edited 7 May 16:15]
|
Spurs have been in the second tier in my lifetime, too young to remember it though. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:10 - May 7 with 1236 views | BlueandTruesince82 | Spurs. I hate West Ham but Spurs woumd be so, so funny |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:11 - May 7 with 1224 views | Benters | West Ham hate them with a passion. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:11 - May 7 with 1228 views | Leaky |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:58 - May 7 by Bobbychase | West Ham. Horrible experience as an away fan, in a stadium they essentially were given. Hideous owner - Sullivan - and some of their fanbase too. |
Agree horrible stadium, don't give a monkey's re the owner or fans. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:11 - May 7 with 1229 views | DBaldy | I'd suggest Spurs are more likely to finish above us next season than West Ham, so I'd rather Spurs get relegated for that reason alone. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:15 - May 7 with 1208 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:24 - May 7 by Kropotkin123 | Spurs, to highlight how ridiculous the breakaway league was. |
And, surely, if we are going to stay up next season competing against West Ham is going to give us a better chance than having Spurs in there isn't it? |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:15 - May 7 with 1209 views | Blue_Heath | Spammers all day long, we've proved we can beat Spurs. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:18 - May 7 with 1195 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:15 - May 7 by Blue_Heath | Spammers all day long, we've proved we can beat Spurs. |
It isn't just about beating them, though, is it? It's about finishing ahead of 3 teams. I reckon West Ham gives us a much better chance of that than Spurs would. But that is also why, having made the change of manager, Spurs will stay up too. Of course, we can beat either of them (if we are going to be good enough to stay up). |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:20 - May 7 with 1194 views | blueden60 | Wess Ham. Dislike them and their stadium immensely. Also remember the robbery that was the cup semi final at Stamford Bridge in 1975 and the two play off losses to them. Will be good to be in a higher division than them next season. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:22 - May 7 with 1182 views | jas0999 | Spurs. But I fear it will be West Ham. |  | |  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 17:38 - May 7 with 1113 views | Herbivore | Spurs for the comedy value, plus West Ham are a side we could potentially target to finish above next season. That said, I wouldn't be at all unhappy to see West Ham go down either. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 18:48 - May 7 with 1001 views | ITFC_Essex | West Ham would be a safer bet to go down next season. Spurs won't be tragic forever. We'd be better off if West Ham stayed up as they are due a drop (like Wolves were). Leeds and Sunderland may suffer with second season syndrome too. |  |
|  |
| Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 18:57 - May 7 with 972 views | dyersdream | Wet spam horrible club chav supporters |  | |  |
| |