| Stoke, stokie, stokie... 17:41 - Dec 18 with 3887 views | OriginalMarkyP |
You got to stop letting personal feelings cloud your judgement.
Its becoming a habit.
You worry about the contracts by StokieBlue 16 Dec 2021 8:31Seems quite a few disagree with you there.
He was very poor, for me, Jackson was chasing the ball down a lot more than Norwood was throughout the first half and got in behind in the second half.
He won't play on Saturday but the Norwood worship on here from some is ridiculous.
SB
You worry about the contracts by OriginalMarkyP 15 Dec 2021 23:57I've got it bad???
You can't leave me alone.
Norwood will play on Saturday. From the bench potentially, but he may well start with Bonne. Jackson won't. You might not like it, but that is what is going to happen.
And BTW, you brought Norwood up not me.
Why do you initial all your posts?
We already know it's you.
it's ok. we love you anyway.
OMP
|  |
| |  |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 17:53 - Dec 18 with 2606 views | Kropotkin123 |
"You can't leave me alone." - Then calls out said poster.
Grow up |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 17:58 - Dec 18 with 2566 views | Keaneish |
You have taken a lot of flack on here about Norwood to be fair. He’s a big player for us whether folk like him or not. We know attitude is questionable but he’s a match winner and a real handful and the difference showed when he went off. Could be a big half season coming up for him.
Thought he was excellent today and never gave the defence a minutes rest. McKenna would have liked that performance I’m sure so expect him to start at Gillingham. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:00 - Dec 18 with 2548 views | timothyeo |
Norwood does score at this level. And hes a bit different to our other options. Cook not utilising him was an obvious mistake along a host of others. |  | | |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:01 - Dec 18 with 2531 views | Herbivore |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 17:58 - Dec 18 by Keaneish |
You have taken a lot of flack on here about Norwood to be fair. He’s a big player for us whether folk like him or not. We know attitude is questionable but he’s a match winner and a real handful and the difference showed when he went off. Could be a big half season coming up for him.
Thought he was excellent today and never gave the defence a minutes rest. McKenna would have liked that performance I’m sure so expect him to start at Gillingham. |
He's a match winner who hasn't yet featured in a winning Town performance this season. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:04 - Dec 18 with 2483 views | Mullet |
It was great to see his opportunism again as it was at Wigan.
You're obsession with him is really weird though. He's really not contributed enough and his exploits have not helped things off the field with colleagues and fans.
He may well redeem himself there, but for me, it's hard to idolise someone who has the drink drive stuff hanging over him. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:05 - Dec 18 with 2454 views | witchdoctor |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:01 - Dec 18 by Herbivore |
He's a match winner who hasn't yet featured in a winning Town performance this season. |
no but his goals have saved us from 2 defeats though… |  | | |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:07 - Dec 18 with 2419 views | jeera |
What is weird is you trying to take personal credit for his achievements. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:29 - Dec 18 with 2290 views | WD19 |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:01 - Dec 18 by Herbivore |
He's a match winner who hasn't yet featured in a winning Town performance this season. |
The bloke on commentary (I think David Connelly the ex striker) said that he was really poor. Poor movement, poor touch, linked nothing and that the new manager would need a hell of a lot more from him than he showed today.
Not sure how fair that was because I did not see the game. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:33 - Dec 18 with 2261 views | jayessess |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:29 - Dec 18 by WD19 |
The bloke on commentary (I think David Connelly the ex striker) said that he was really poor. Poor movement, poor touch, linked nothing and that the new manager would need a hell of a lot more from him than he showed today.
Not sure how fair that was because I did not see the game. |
99% of what he did today was beyond awful, but we're a team who can't buy a goal right now, so the 1% counts for a lot. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:42 - Dec 18 with 2187 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:29 - Dec 18 by WD19 |
The bloke on commentary (I think David Connelly the ex striker) said that he was really poor. Poor movement, poor touch, linked nothing and that the new manager would need a hell of a lot more from him than he showed today.
Not sure how fair that was because I did not see the game. |
Completely unfair. Worked his socks off. Had lots of aggression and chased their defenders down.
I was disappointed that he was subbed instead of Bonne tbh. Should have also put Pig on instead of Chaplin for his height as Sunderland had big defenders. [Post edited 18 Dec 2021 18:42]
|  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:45 - Dec 18 with 2181 views | positivity |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:42 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
Completely unfair. Worked his socks off. Had lots of aggression and chased their defenders down.
I was disappointed that he was subbed instead of Bonne tbh. Should have also put Pig on instead of Chaplin for his height as Sunderland had big defenders. [Post edited 18 Dec 2021 18:42]
|
don't think he can last 90, so was the right call for me.
agree about pigott though and chaplin should have come on for aluko who faded a bit later on | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:46 - Dec 18 with 2169 views | OriginalMarkyP |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:07 - Dec 18 by jeera |
What is weird is you trying to take personal credit for his achievements. |
I'm not. But SB seems to like smashing me everytime. I didn't even bring Norwood up in that POST. He DID. SB likes putting people in their place and dishing it out. That's fine, it's the Internet. so But when he does it to me I will remind him when he's got it wrong. I don't like Norwood as person particularly, but while he's our player and he offers something others don't, I'll want him to play. Simple. | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:47 - Dec 18 with 2155 views | footers |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:42 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
Completely unfair. Worked his socks off. Had lots of aggression and chased their defenders down.
I was disappointed that he was subbed instead of Bonne tbh. Should have also put Pig on instead of Chaplin for his height as Sunderland had big defenders. [Post edited 18 Dec 2021 18:42]
|
He also lost his head completely unnecessarily and could have been on for a red later, which is why I'm sure he was taken off. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:50 - Dec 18 with 2112 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:47 - Dec 18 by footers |
He also lost his head completely unnecessarily and could have been on for a red later, which is why I'm sure he was taken off. |
That’s what you get with him. All part of the package.
Personal and off field issues aside, we need more nastiness in this team. | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:53 - Dec 18 with 2113 views | Darth_Koont |
Don’t be silly.
Stokie is one of the very, very few posters that plays with a straight bat. We can disagree but he’s definitely not a sh/t-talker. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:54 - Dec 18 with 2096 views | witchdoctor |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:47 - Dec 18 by footers |
He also lost his head completely unnecessarily and could have been on for a red later, which is why I'm sure he was taken off. |
bet you was gutted he scored…AGAIN!😂😂😂 | | | |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:54 - Dec 18 with 2093 views | footers |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:50 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
That’s what you get with him. All part of the package.
Personal and off field issues aside, we need more nastiness in this team. |
True. Tbh I'm still not convinced by Norwood at all, to say the least. He's a liability.
Morsy was an absolute beast today - that's what we need more of, not more giving refs and earful and trying to start pointless fights. He was immense. | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:58 - Dec 18 with 2051 views | positivity |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:50 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
That’s what you get with him. All part of the package.
Personal and off field issues aside, we need more nastiness in this team. |
but we need a player who can last 90 minutes (fitness and discipline-wise), otherwise he's a sub at best | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:08 - Dec 18 with 1973 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:54 - Dec 18 by footers |
True. Tbh I'm still not convinced by Norwood at all, to say the least. He's a liability.
Morsy was an absolute beast today - that's what we need more of, not more giving refs and earful and trying to start pointless fights. He was immense. |
Yes Morsy really stood out today and did a lot of hard work in the middle. | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:20 - Dec 18 with 1893 views | Keaneish |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:08 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
Yes Morsy really stood out today and did a lot of hard work in the middle. |
I think that role in a proper DMC position behind the midfield two suited him a lot better today. He read the game well. | |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:24 - Dec 18 with 1861 views | jayessess |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:42 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
Completely unfair. Worked his socks off. Had lots of aggression and chased their defenders down.
I was disappointed that he was subbed instead of Bonne tbh. Should have also put Pig on instead of Chaplin for his height as Sunderland had big defenders. [Post edited 18 Dec 2021 18:42]
|
Did he successfully hold the ball up one time or complete a single pass? Not that I can remember. [Post edited 18 Dec 2021 19:36]
| |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:26 - Dec 18 with 1845 views | noggin |
Goal aside, he was poor today. |  |
| |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:31 - Dec 18 with 1803 views | itfcsuth |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 18:50 - Dec 18 by GlasgowBlue |
That’s what you get with him. All part of the package.
Personal and off field issues aside, we need more nastiness in this team. |
Agree.
I quite like seeing that edge from Norwood, and it’s all part of the package, I don’t think there can be any doubt he is a handful at this level.
I like seeing it from Morsy as well, Bonne has a bit of edge in his game as well.
We need that in the side, it has to be there. |  | | |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:49 - Dec 18 with 1693 views | StokieBlue |
Firstly, as a point of order, I don't believe I've ever called you out, I have only responded to the copious postings with which you litter the board.
As for Norwood today, it was a nice header at the end of a good move involving Morsy and Bonne.
Aside from that I didn't think he played particularly well, no better than Bonne and he also managed to get himself in a scuffle about something that had absolutely nothing to do with him. On another day that could have gone differently. His link up play was virtually non-existent today in my opinion.
Now there could be an argument made that all you want from your striker is goals and in that case he could well be your man but I'm not sure it's justifying your gloating attitude over the last week. You'd think he was Messi from your posts.
SB |  | | |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 21:59 - Dec 18 with 1489 views | OriginalMarkyP |
| Stoke, stokie, stokie... on 19:24 - Dec 18 by jayessess |
Did he successfully hold the ball up one time or complete a single pass? Not that I can remember. [Post edited 18 Dec 2021 19:36]
|
He put Evans away for the cross that Penny should have scored from | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
