| That thread shouldn't have been removed 09:39 - Jul 16 with 12384 views | StokieBlue |
I don't think that thread should have been removed.
Some people posted controversial views in there which were read by those concerned and are now not available to the greater community. People have left, some during the course of that thread and I don't think the posts should be stricken from the record like that.
SB |  | | |  |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:04 - Jul 16 with 1611 views | chicoazul |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 10:59 - Jul 16 by Ewan_Oozami |
Didn't we have a bit of bantz with the Charlton lot at that time? They thought we'd be back up pretty quick and they'd be in the PL forever....how well did that go? |
I don’t remember that. You may be right, but TWTD had never had much time for cross-board wars, concerned more as it has always been with internal politicking. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:09 - Jul 16 with 1599 views | Ewan_Oozami |
This is so meta - we've got a growing thread discussing a thread that has been removed, and that thread discussed a poster who no longer posts!
And there's still the FPT to come..... |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:13 - Jul 16 with 1577 views | hoppy |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:04 - Jul 16 by chicoazul |
I don’t remember that. You may be right, but TWTD had never had much time for cross-board wars, concerned more as it has always been with internal politicking. |
Well, I'll just say also, you rarely see any Whigfield fans coming on here any more... |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:15 - Jul 16 with 1569 views | Ftnfwest |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:13 - Jul 16 by hoppy |
Well, I'll just say also, you rarely see any Whigfield fans coming on here any more... |
That was definitely the best invasion. Mind you, after what's happened in the last month they're probably all grown up 'football fans' now. We did do one or two other rivals sites i seem to remember. |  | | |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:15 - Jul 16 with 1566 views | chicoazul |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:13 - Jul 16 by hoppy |
Well, I'll just say also, you rarely see any Whigfield fans coming on here any more... |
Hahah! | |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:17 - Jul 16 with 1558 views | Steve_M |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:15 - Jul 16 by Ftnfwest |
That was definitely the best invasion. Mind you, after what's happened in the last month they're probably all grown up 'football fans' now. We did do one or two other rivals sites i seem to remember. |
We all decamped to the glassblowers board because TWTD was too slow to use one day. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:21 - Jul 16 with 1532 views | witchdoctor |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 10:32 - Jul 16 by VillageGreen |
 |
obsessed or what?…rent free in your bonce..🤣 |  | | |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:22 - Jul 16 with 1519 views | Ftnfwest |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:17 - Jul 16 by Steve_M |
We all decamped to the glassblowers board because TWTD was too slow to use one day. |
missed that one but not surprised, usually a Friday pm jaunt as i remember | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:31 - Jul 16 with 1485 views | Steve_M |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:22 - Jul 16 by Ftnfwest |
missed that one but not surprised, usually a Friday pm jaunt as i remember |
I don't know, can't imagine I was in the library at uni on a Friday afternoon.... | |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:34 - Jul 16 with 1458 views | Ryorry |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:13 - Jul 16 by hoppy |
Well, I'll just say also, you rarely see any Whigfield fans coming on here any more... |
There was a time when all the posters on all the different club sites run by Rivals had a free pass to go onto each others' forums without registering for a new account on that site wasn't there - something to do with a takeover which only lasted a short time? Might have caused a bit of mayhem, I can't remember! |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:41 - Jul 16 with 1437 views | Ftnfwest |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:31 - Jul 16 by Steve_M |
I don't know, can't imagine I was in the library at uni on a Friday afternoon.... |
i'd have just had a couple of lunchtime beers in central london, so entirely feasible! | | | |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:43 - Jul 16 with 1422 views | vapour_trail |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:04 - Jul 16 by chicoazul |
I don’t remember that. You may be right, but TWTD had never had much time for cross-board wars, concerned more as it has always been with internal politicking. |
There was a virtual fracas with the charlton board, but yes short lived.
The board war with the massives from Manchester City, in the days when us and them were genuine rivals, went on for quite some time though. A bunch of tw@ts from their postcode were on here regularly, and we had our own band of intellectually limited lads who frequented whatever their board was.
The whigfield invasion was an afternoon well spent. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 12:20 - Jul 16 with 1348 views | J2BLUE |
Phil's reasoning is fair enough but agree, it would have been nice if it stayed up.
The bedwetting when the tables were turned was hilarious. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 12:26 - Jul 16 with 1317 views | pointofblue |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 11:13 - Jul 16 by hoppy |
Well, I'll just say also, you rarely see any Whigfield fans coming on here any more... |
They only posted on a Saturday night... |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 12:53 - Jul 16 with 1284 views | N2_Blue |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 09:46 - Jul 16 by PhilTWTD |
Sorry, I didn't think it showed the forum at its best and agreed with the comment about aspects of it being quite nasty. Was uncomfortable about some of the comments which had been made remaining. Didn't think they made the site seem particularly welcoming and not sort of place I'd like it to be. |
I agree it wasn’t a great look for the forum.
There was some nastiness creeping in that was unnecessary . Didn’t think a post commenting on ChrisMakin was necessary and if I read that about myself I wouldn’t feel great. Be kinder people. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:26 - Jul 16 with 1229 views | factual_blue |
I presume you're talking about the thread with the obscene photos of vile 'cakes'? |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:27 - Jul 16 with 1225 views | factual_blue |
Oh. so you're not already a member of the VIP section then? | |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:30 - Jul 16 with 1218 views | Superblue95 |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 10:52 - Jul 16 by hoppy |
That's one of the favourites at my SAD group (Suffolk Dyslexic Association) |
You made me choke on a crisp. Have an uppie |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:36 - Jul 16 with 1200 views | Plums |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 09:47 - Jul 16 by Steve_M |
I don't know, it was rather tedious in places. A few too many people on here, including some I generally like as posters, can't resist going over old grudges all the time. I'm more surprised it lasted as long as it did.
Telling Phil he isn't running the board very well isn't a great look either.
Edit: to clarify that last comment not aimed at this post, rather some of the comment in the other thread. [Post edited 16 Jul 2021 9:47]
|
I can’t be the only long term member who sees a thread with more than four pages and thinks ‘here we go again - won’t bother with that one’. It’s so sadly predictable and Phil’s correct to clean the place up. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:41 - Jul 16 with 1188 views | factual_blue |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 10:37 - Jul 16 by Seablu |
Policing threads on politics, Brexit, BLM , departing posters & covid are obviously causing 95% of your problems on here.
Maybe it’s time for you to make it a football only forum.
I’m sure that would help the drive for new recruits, who are obviously being put off by 10 pages of disagreement on taking the knee, mask-wearing, Corbyn, feeding starving kids etc.
Personally, I love those threads as it’s wonderful to see a baseless & ignorant opinion torn to shreds, but it clearly deters new intakes.
Has the new away kit been discussed yet? |
If people want to read endlessly repeated threads about new kits, squad numbers, what an idiot the manager is/isn't, team selection, why aren't we buying a player who'd never entertain signing for us, and so on, they can select the football only view.
Just use the button at the top of the forum. | |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 14:12 - Jul 16 with 1131 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 10:03 - Jul 16 by StokieBlue |
I'm not often very rude.
Banksy and I have had a chat and hopefully all is well.
SB |
I do have a black eye but it's all good. |  |
| |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 14:17 - Jul 16 with 1115 views | MattinLondon |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:26 - Jul 16 by factual_blue |
I presume you're talking about the thread with the obscene photos of vile 'cakes'? |
Shocking. |  | | |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 14:21 - Jul 16 with 1090 views | 26_Paz |
The individuals in question have gone. Time to move on. |  |
| |
| [Redacted] on 14:25 - Jul 16 with 1085 views | victorywilhappen |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 13:27 - Jul 16 by factual_blue |
Oh. so you're not already a member of the VIP section then? |
[Redacted] |  | | |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 14:26 - Jul 16 with 1079 views | jaykay |
| That thread shouldn't have been removed on 09:46 - Jul 16 by PhilTWTD |
Sorry, I didn't think it showed the forum at its best and agreed with the comment about aspects of it being quite nasty. Was uncomfortable about some of the comments which had been made remaining. Didn't think they made the site seem particularly welcoming and not sort of place I'd like it to be. |
so a thread can turn nasty without spruce and herb. i thought that couldn't happen unless they were involved , which has turned out to be untrue |  |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
