So what do we will think of Prince Harry 16:45 - Jan 5 with 12571 views | Keno | And his latest disclosures then? |  |
| |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 23:04 - Jan 5 with 2236 views | Lord_Lucan |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 22:56 - Jan 5 by lowhouseblue | respect to him for serving in the army (and not in some token role). he has clearly been messed up by his upbringing etc and seems pretty sad and damaged. his publicity chasing and claims of victimhood aren't really a good look for someone quite that privileged. |
I will never forget his mums funeral and the poor two boys walking down the mall. I always had a soft spot for the bloke as it happens, especially when he went a bit off the rails. He then joined the army and like you said he wasn't a token, it was plain as day he was target number one. What's happened recently though is just an embarrassment. He is the polar opposite of his grandma. |  |
|  |
Hear hear… I’m a Republican, think the Royals are privileged Sloanes… BUT on 23:09 - Jan 5 with 2203 views | unstableblue |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 22:02 - Jan 5 by Whos_blue | I say cut him a bit of slack and hear what he has to say. It may be that his is a story worth hearing. I don't really buy the narrative that they left the royals to get privacy, but then are doing all these interviews etc. Regardless of your views on the royals, it seems difficult to avoid the fact that nearly every story about them was negative, so maybe it is their time to have their say. To date, no one has debunked anything he's said, other than of course those detractors who didn't have anything good to say about him/them in the first place. |
This is a story about the English press, their history of demonising people, and someone trying to rail against it… and just how vitriolic and poisonous they can become Been going on for decades The fact the Royal family were implicit in briefing against Harry and especially Meghan adds to the darkness of the story. |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 23:17 - Jan 5 with 2170 views | Melford |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 22:49 - Jan 5 by Lord_Lucan | You mean the guy that was constantly getting thrown out of clubs for misbehaviour, the swastika wearing bloke that galavants down the Vegas strip every month and then playing pool in the nude? To be honest I thought he was brilliant! I fondly remember watching his wedding in the pub, it was great to see the nation coming out and cheering the new diversity in the royal family. I particularly liked Charles walking the mother in law down the aisle and it all encored with the crazy priest black dude doing the brother lee love stuff. Blooming brilliant. I'm just upset that Harry decided to go and live a private life in order to shun publicity. I hope he's doing ok. [Post edited 5 Jan 2023 22:52]
|
The only one out of the lot I'd go for a beer/spliff with. He was young and loaded and could literally do anything a young bloke that age could do and get away with it, I'd have done much worse if I was in that situation and so would you. |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 23:19 - Jan 5 with 2146 views | Lord_Lucan |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 23:17 - Jan 5 by Melford | The only one out of the lot I'd go for a beer/spliff with. He was young and loaded and could literally do anything a young bloke that age could do and get away with it, I'd have done much worse if I was in that situation and so would you. |
To be honest I think his balls are crushed. He's fecked baby! I'd rather go out on the lash with Zara and Anne |  |
|  |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 23:33 - Jan 5 with 2095 views | HARRY10 |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 22:36 - Jan 5 by ArnoldMoorhen | People always say "Prince Harry's ginger. James Hewitt's ginger. Eh? EH?" It's bollcks. The ginger gene runs in Princess Diana's family. Earl Spencer, Princess Diana's brother, is ginger. . . . . . But isn't it worse if she fcked her brother? |
err, I think it is a bit more than ginger hair. The startling resemblance might be a bigger factor. Of course his mother admitting to an adultress affair would have to mean she was using contraceptives with Hewitt but not Charles, and the similarly shaped nose is a result of Hewitt teaching her to ride (a horse, in case you are wondering), with genetic similarities often occuring. |  | |  |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 08:02 - Jan 6 with 1947 views | GlasgowBlue |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 23:33 - Jan 5 by HARRY10 | err, I think it is a bit more than ginger hair. The startling resemblance might be a bigger factor. Of course his mother admitting to an adultress affair would have to mean she was using contraceptives with Hewitt but not Charles, and the similarly shaped nose is a result of Hewitt teaching her to ride (a horse, in case you are wondering), with genetic similarities often occuring. |
The only flaw in your cunning detective work is that Harry was born on 15 September 1984 and Diana did not meet James Hewitt until the summer if 1986. |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 08:18 - Jan 6 with 1932 views | chicoazul | Who cares. |  |
|  |
Spoilsport (n/t) on 08:20 - Jan 6 with 1928 views | Bloots |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 08:02 - Jan 6 by GlasgowBlue | The only flaw in your cunning detective work is that Harry was born on 15 September 1984 and Diana did not meet James Hewitt until the summer if 1986. |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 08:22 - Jan 6 with 1932 views | itfcjoe | I think it is sad just how pathetic he has become, and also massively hypocritical when talking about people briefing the press against them whilst knowing that they have done and do exactly the same in private. It's not difficult to work out which royal reporters are in which camps and where they get their story from. It just isn't a good look to play the 'woe is me' card when living a more priviliged life than 99.999999% of people on the planet because your brother and Dad are in the 0.000001% that are even more priviliged. And talking about killing 25 Afghani's, I've not read the piece and probably won't and sure he was more talking about what mental anguish it has caused him etc - but I bet his security bill has just gone up, I wouldn't want to be one of them as he's just put a bigger target on his back |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 08:44 - Jan 6 with 1890 views | Churchman | Rich and privileged people having a spat with rich and privileged people to make more easy money to add to the heaps they’ve already got. Interesting that he puts that before his relationship with his brother. When it comes to it, I don’t know these people, never met them and don’t wish to. Not interested. |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 09:49 - Jan 6 with 1822 views | brazil1982 | I think he's a hypocrite and what he has done is a disgrace but he needs the money - it's all he has to sell. I think these "revelations" are not very big really - we know very little of the private life of the Royals that anything can be seen as a revelation. Playing the victim of privilege won't last long. For some one who wanted privacy he's not going about it very well is he? Quote from the Spectator: "But Harry could have learned from the Swedish royal Princess Madeleine, who was also a ‘spare’. When she found the royal life unbearable, she married an American and went to live in Florida, exiting the royal family. To her, it was a fair exchange: she forfeited the perks in return for private citizenship. She has not sought a penny from publicity. The Swedish public has heard no more from her, save for her occasional trips home when she visits her family." |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:03 - Jan 6 with 1731 views | Rob88 |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 22:02 - Jan 5 by Whos_blue | I say cut him a bit of slack and hear what he has to say. It may be that his is a story worth hearing. I don't really buy the narrative that they left the royals to get privacy, but then are doing all these interviews etc. Regardless of your views on the royals, it seems difficult to avoid the fact that nearly every story about them was negative, so maybe it is their time to have their say. To date, no one has debunked anything he's said, other than of course those detractors who didn't have anything good to say about him/them in the first place. |
I think it’s exactly that. It’s a reprisal. As for the privacy bit. What H&M are saying is they had a constant media presence wherever they went whether that was on the land of property they were staying at or overhead, they were being hounded and that is what they wanted to stop. They were saying the press justify that aggressive, invasive approach by saying that they are paid by the taxpayer therefore the taxpayer has a right to know what they are up to and report on them. They decided, logically, to counter that argument by stepping down and no longer funded by the taxpayer. There engagement with the media is then back on their terms. It is no surprise they are releasing Netflix series and books. They need to fund themselves now and I was reading their annual security bill alone is $3 million. [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 12:13]
|  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:34 - Jan 6 with 1675 views | itfcjoe |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:03 - Jan 6 by Rob88 | I think it’s exactly that. It’s a reprisal. As for the privacy bit. What H&M are saying is they had a constant media presence wherever they went whether that was on the land of property they were staying at or overhead, they were being hounded and that is what they wanted to stop. They were saying the press justify that aggressive, invasive approach by saying that they are paid by the taxpayer therefore the taxpayer has a right to know what they are up to and report on them. They decided, logically, to counter that argument by stepping down and no longer funded by the taxpayer. There engagement with the media is then back on their terms. It is no surprise they are releasing Netflix series and books. They need to fund themselves now and I was reading their annual security bill alone is $3 million. [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 12:13]
|
"They need to fund themselves now and I was reading their annual security bill alone is $3 million." That may have just increased after admitting killing 25 Afghan's, sure the Taliban would love to take him out as a reprisal |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:38 - Jan 6 with 1636 views | Rob88 |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:34 - Jan 6 by itfcjoe | "They need to fund themselves now and I was reading their annual security bill alone is $3 million." That may have just increased after admitting killing 25 Afghan's, sure the Taliban would love to take him out as a reprisal |
I am amazed that nobody advised him to go light on the detail with that bit, especially no numbers. Idiocy. |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:39 - Jan 6 with 1624 views | itfcjoe |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:38 - Jan 6 by Rob88 | I am amazed that nobody advised him to go light on the detail with that bit, especially no numbers. Idiocy. |
I just had a Sky News alert pop up after posting that with a Taliban leader saying "they weren't chess pieces" tried to read it and actually cleared it but an incredibly idiotic thing to say |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:46 - Jan 6 with 1590 views | MattinLondon | A lot of people seem to be angry at Harry for not wanting to play the role of the Warrior-Prince anymore whilst at the same time opening a dirty window into the royal family. Calling Harry pathetic or insinuating that he has had his balls crushed is outdated macho rubbish that is another way of attacking him for not being that Alpha Action Man. The same people trying to live out their fantasy and then becoming annoyed that, like them, marriage and kids have changed Harry. Ideally, I’d abolish the monarchy and have little interest in them but I have a lot of sympathy for both Harry and William. Whereas William has seemingly brought into the continuation of monarchy at any price, Harry has simply said ‘no’. This no angers the tabloid press and now see it at their job to belittle H&M. After all it’s their job to tell the public what to think about royalty rather than the individuals. If the British media continuously attacks them (with the blessing of the Royal Family) then they have the right to reply and make millions out of the muppets who berate them. I don’t blame them, royalty would rather shield his degenerate uncle then him. |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 13:11 - Jan 6 with 1557 views | eastwell_blue | We think nothing at all what with having a life and all |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:07 - Jan 6 with 1500 views | bluejacko |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 12:39 - Jan 6 by itfcjoe | I just had a Sky News alert pop up after posting that with a Taliban leader saying "they weren't chess pieces" tried to read it and actually cleared it but an incredibly idiotic thing to say |
They were not chess pieces but taliban fighters intent on doing our soldiers harm so they were valid targets! BUT to come out and say what he has is an incredible piece of stupidity! Talk about painting a target on your back for every Muslim fanatic to try to even the score. His security people must be going bonkers at him🙄 |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:15 - Jan 6 with 1482 views | Warkystache |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:07 - Jan 6 by bluejacko | They were not chess pieces but taliban fighters intent on doing our soldiers harm so they were valid targets! BUT to come out and say what he has is an incredible piece of stupidity! Talk about painting a target on your back for every Muslim fanatic to try to even the score. His security people must be going bonkers at him🙄 |
I found it more unsettling when he said about losing his V plates in a pub car park with a woman old enough to be his mum whilst anyone collecting their Roller or Porsche might have seen them. I bet he only lasted 10 seconds.... |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:24 - Jan 6 with 1466 views | Ewan_Oozami | I'm sure he's only bluffing... |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:31 - Jan 6 with 1440 views | bluejacko |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:15 - Jan 6 by Warkystache | I found it more unsettling when he said about losing his V plates in a pub car park with a woman old enough to be his mum whilst anyone collecting their Roller or Porsche might have seen them. I bet he only lasted 10 seconds.... |
Do you think his close protection officer was taking notes for Harry’s book😄? |  | |  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:36 - Jan 6 with 1422 views | itfcjoe |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:07 - Jan 6 by bluejacko | They were not chess pieces but taliban fighters intent on doing our soldiers harm so they were valid targets! BUT to come out and say what he has is an incredible piece of stupidity! Talk about painting a target on your back for every Muslim fanatic to try to even the score. His security people must be going bonkers at him🙄 |
I don't disagree with first point - we were at war and these horrors happen there |  |
|  |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 14:38 - Jan 6 with 1413 views | HARRY10 |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 08:02 - Jan 6 by GlasgowBlue | The only flaw in your cunning detective work is that Harry was born on 15 September 1984 and Diana did not meet James Hewitt until the summer if 1986. |
Gosh, who knew that claim had been made .... other than anyone who has read a newspaper in the past 20 years. Pointing out the uncanny likeness between James Hewitt and Harry Windsor is hardly 'cunning detective work, though it might seem as such to you. Next you'll be telling us that budding Sherlock Holmes can work out the date a newspaper is printed by checking information at the top of the front page. |  | |  |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 15:01 - Jan 6 with 1394 views | blueasfook |
His Dad needs to tell him.... on 08:02 - Jan 6 by GlasgowBlue | The only flaw in your cunning detective work is that Harry was born on 15 September 1984 and Diana did not meet James Hewitt until the summer if 1986. |
Have you seen the Aussie guy who claims he is the illegitimate son of Charles and Camilla (claims to have been conceived when they were like 18 or something) and then taken away after birth and given to some family in Oz to adopt. Total nutjob. |  |
|  |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 15:11 - Jan 6 with 1356 views | Rob88 |
So what do we will think of Prince Harry on 14:15 - Jan 6 by Warkystache | I found it more unsettling when he said about losing his V plates in a pub car park with a woman old enough to be his mum whilst anyone collecting their Roller or Porsche might have seen them. I bet he only lasted 10 seconds.... |
Lucky bugga |  | |  |
| |