| Jay Stansfield 08:02 - Dec 20 with 16380 views | SitfcB |
No surprise. |  |
| |  |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:02 - Dec 20 with 3080 views | portmanking |
| Jay Stansfield on 09:54 - Dec 20 by _clive_baker_ |
Guess that would be the preference. Maybe Fulham have come to the conclusion that he’s not one they see a future for and will take a fee for him. Would think it would be quite chunky, must be worth a few million? Probably some element of promotion related bonus.
Would be an exciting signing, very much meets the criteria of young and with potential |
He's absolutely a signing which futureproofs things across one or two positions. Especially since one of our current hot-shots is attracting some surprise interest higher up the food chain. |  | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:19 - Dec 20 with 2975 views | Keno |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:02 - Dec 20 by portmanking |
He's absolutely a signing which futureproofs things across one or two positions. Especially since one of our current hot-shots is attracting some surprise interest higher up the food chain. |
"Especially since one of our current hot-shots is attracting some surprise interest"
eh?? |  |
| |
| Stansfield does play in a 4-2-3-1 but in a different way to Hirst on 10:39 - Dec 20 with 2890 views | portmanking |
| Stansfield does play in a 4-2-3-1 but in a different way to Hirst on 10:01 - Dec 20 by unstableblue |
From the limited times i've seen Stansfield play as the lone striker.. I recall him playing in a different way to Hirst. Little hold up play or acting as a target man.
Isn't he more running behind and at defenders.
Closer to a Ladapo or even Broadhead than a Hirst.
Or have I got that completely wrong? [Post edited 20 Dec 2023 12:10]
|
I'd say comparing Stansfield to Luongo is completely and utterly wrong, yes. | | | |
| Stansfield does play in a 4-2-3-1 but in a different way to Hirst on 10:42 - Dec 20 with 2839 views | StokieBlue |
| Stansfield does play in a 4-2-3-1 but in a different way to Hirst on 10:01 - Dec 20 by unstableblue |
From the limited times i've seen Stansfield play as the lone striker.. I recall him playing in a different way to Hirst. Little hold up play or acting as a target man.
Isn't he more running behind and at defenders.
Closer to a Ladapo or even Broadhead than a Hirst.
Or have I got that completely wrong? [Post edited 20 Dec 2023 12:10]
|
From memory, he played as a lone striker for Brum against us earlier in the season and scored.
He's nothing like Massimo.
SB |  |
| |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:46 - Dec 20 with 2783 views | Ftnfwest |
He's been around the world |  | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:46 - Dec 20 with 2780 views | BiGDonnie |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:19 - Dec 20 by Keno |
"Especially since one of our current hot-shots is attracting some surprise interest"
eh?? |
Gotta be Chaplin. |  |
| |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:47 - Dec 20 with 2768 views | Keno |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:46 - Dec 20 by BiGDonnie |
Gotta be Chaplin. |
Hope not, I like Chappers | |
| |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:48 - Dec 20 with 2736 views | BiGDonnie |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:47 - Dec 20 by Keno |
Hope not, I like Chappers |
Same, but I can't see it being Burns or B'head. Hirst only just signed but I suppose someone could be keen on him.
Maybe Hutchinson is attracting interest. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Jay Stansfield on 10:53 - Dec 20 with 2669 views | tcblue |
If the kitty really is £3m, I can't see this being permanent.
Maybe that figure is for a loan fee (plus compensation to Brum, as he's not got a recall option)? | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:53 - Dec 20 with 2668 views | strikalite |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:46 - Dec 20 by BiGDonnie |
Gotta be Chaplin. |
Not a chance they'd sell Chaplin, not even for £30m given our position and the riches of the Prem.. |  | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:59 - Dec 20 with 2580 views | Charlie_pl_baxter |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:53 - Dec 20 by tcblue |
If the kitty really is £3m, I can't see this being permanent.
Maybe that figure is for a loan fee (plus compensation to Brum, as he's not got a recall option)? |
EADT seem to think the budget could be higher "for the right player" |  |
| |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:00 - Dec 20 with 2573 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| Jay Stansfield on 09:54 - Dec 20 by _clive_baker_ |
Guess that would be the preference. Maybe Fulham have come to the conclusion that he’s not one they see a future for and will take a fee for him. Would think it would be quite chunky, must be worth a few million? Probably some element of promotion related bonus.
Would be an exciting signing, very much meets the criteria of young and with potential |
He would be a brilliant signing, but the Fulham fans (my sone being one) see him as one of their own and are expecting him to either stick around or be sold for a very large amount of money (and I don't think that amount = £3m + add ons...) | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:02 - Dec 20 with 2540 views | berkstractorboy |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:53 - Dec 20 by tcblue |
If the kitty really is £3m, I can't see this being permanent.
Maybe that figure is for a loan fee (plus compensation to Brum, as he's not got a recall option)? |
I am sure one of Phil's articles in the last day has suggested its more than £3M available.
Reality is nobody except the board/owners knows its a number some journo has made up, like anyone would be privy to that info. | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:07 - Dec 20 with 2478 views | Meadowlark |
He gave the reason, the reasons he should go
And he said things he hadn't said before
And he was, oh, oh, so mad
And I don't think he's coming back, coming back |  | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:10 - Dec 20 with 2438 views | Zapers |
| Jay Stansfield on 10:53 - Dec 20 by strikalite |
Not a chance they'd sell Chaplin, not even for £30m given our position and the riches of the Prem.. |
You are joking, right! | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:14 - Dec 20 with 2390 views | PhilTWTD |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:02 - Dec 20 by berkstractorboy |
I am sure one of Phil's articles in the last day has suggested its more than £3M available.
Reality is nobody except the board/owners knows its a number some journo has made up, like anyone would be privy to that info. |
Indeed, I've been led to believe that that figure was speculative and conservative. |  | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:15 - Dec 20 with 2382 views | PhilTWTD |
| Jay Stansfield on 09:12 - Dec 20 by Mullet |
Been an open secret for a month? Maybe more?
Does this pressure Brum to up their loan offer or accept we are likely to take him? |
Indeed, heard about it a month ago and was told too early to start reporting interest.
And, of course, he's one they've been interested in for some while.
This post has been edited by an administrator | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:16 - Dec 20 with 2342 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:15 - Dec 20 by PhilTWTD |
Indeed, heard about it a month ago and was told too early to start reporting interest.
And, of course, he's one they've been interested in for some while.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Good chance of happening do you think? |  |
| |
| Stansfield does play in a 4-2-3-1 but in a different way to Hirst on 11:19 - Dec 20 with 2290 views | dirtyboy |
| Stansfield does play in a 4-2-3-1 but in a different way to Hirst on 10:01 - Dec 20 by unstableblue |
From the limited times i've seen Stansfield play as the lone striker.. I recall him playing in a different way to Hirst. Little hold up play or acting as a target man.
Isn't he more running behind and at defenders.
Closer to a Ladapo or even Broadhead than a Hirst.
Or have I got that completely wrong? [Post edited 20 Dec 2023 12:10]
|
He's been playing up top as a lone striker, probably prefers to drop deeper and can certainly play the Chaplin/Broadhead position, but definitely seen enough to say he'd suit us, but have slightly different attributes to Hirst.
It's a case of him knowing that the work that player does is absolutely appreciated by Ipswich fans, like Hirst who is just brilliant doing what he does. |  | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:32 - Dec 20 with 2149 views | Zapers |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:16 - Dec 20 by Kieran_Knows |
Good chance of happening do you think? |
I’m pretty sure I’m right in saying that all players incoming, once they have been reported in TWTD and the EADT, have actually materialised.
I could well be wrong, but I don’t think so. | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:33 - Dec 20 with 2127 views | PhilTWTD |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:16 - Dec 20 by Kieran_Knows |
Good chance of happening do you think? |
I'd say he's well up the list at the very least. | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:34 - Dec 20 with 2104 views | PhilTWTD |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:32 - Dec 20 by Zapers |
I’m pretty sure I’m right in saying that all players incoming, once they have been reported in TWTD and the EADT, have actually materialised.
I could well be wrong, but I don’t think so. |
No, that's not right. There have been players we've been interested in and we and others have reported which ultimately haven't happened. | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:37 - Dec 20 with 2069 views | Zapers |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:34 - Dec 20 by PhilTWTD |
No, that's not right. There have been players we've been interested in and we and others have reported which ultimately haven't happened. |
Apologies, I stand corrected. | | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:40 - Dec 20 with 2035 views | PhilTWTD |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:37 - Dec 20 by Zapers |
Apologies, I stand corrected. |
Here's an example:
| | | |
| Jay Stansfield on 11:44 - Dec 20 with 1987 views | lizzibee |
Happy with this if it's true. Permanent not loan though please | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
