| Rules are for the little people on 15:54 - Nov 3 with 1673 views | SomethingBlue |
Wonder if this what what the people of Ipswich had in mind when they voted, no doubt in good faith in most cases, for Tom Hunt to represent the town in parliament. |  |
|  |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:55 - Nov 3 with 1652 views | homer_123 |
Can't even be arsed to raise an eyebrow.... |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:55 - Nov 3 with 1657 views | itfcjoe |
Such a silly move by them, it's the point where arrogance just clouds judgement so much because this is sort of thing that will come back to bite when all of a sudden all the sleaze becomes too much
If he's have served his suspension and then come back no one would have even remembered this by time next GE comes around - it stinks |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:56 - Nov 3 with 1641 views | DanTheMan |
It wasn't even a long suspension, the reaction from them has been absurd over this. |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:59 - Nov 3 with 1638 views | SomethingBlue |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:55 - Nov 3 by homer_123 |
Can't even be arsed to raise an eyebrow.... |
And that's the problem right there, don't let that happen to you.
There should be open revolt on the streets at what is happening in this country — and in countries with better social and political education there would be. | |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:04 - Nov 3 with 1607 views | footers |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:59 - Nov 3 by SomethingBlue |
And that's the problem right there, don't let that happen to you.
There should be open revolt on the streets at what is happening in this country — and in countries with better social and political education there would be. |
It's almost as if they want to keep people ignorant of what they're doing.
But no, that's just silly talk. |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:08 - Nov 3 with 1578 views | factual_blue |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:54 - Nov 3 by SomethingBlue |
Wonder if this what what the people of Ipswich had in mind when they voted, no doubt in good faith in most cases, for Tom Hunt to represent the town in parliament. |
VEY WORNTED BREXZIT DUN |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:09 - Nov 3 with 1575 views | Steve_M |
Corruption is overused in politics but this is exactly what this is.
It was Hamilton, Aitkin and Archer that made the Tories unelectable for a decade and this is a straight up repeat of those low standards. At least then Ministers used to resign. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rules are for the little people on 16:13 - Nov 3 with 1557 views | footers |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:09 - Nov 3 by Steve_M |
Corruption is overused in politics but this is exactly what this is.
It was Hamilton, Aitkin and Archer that made the Tories unelectable for a decade and this is a straight up repeat of those low standards. At least then Ministers used to resign. |
I still think it's outrageous that any sitting MP can be on a board of directors/consultant to a private company. If done properly, being an MP is a very demanding job, but many of them are simply there to lobby on behalf of private interests, rather than their constituents, it would seem. | |
| |
| THIS IS HUGE NEWS; and a recent damning report from this committee has on 16:16 - Nov 3 with 1542 views | unstableblue |
… been buried under COP news
A report that is damning on Tory corruption
Remember Major set up this commuter to tackle Tory sleaze |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:20 - Nov 3 with 1519 views | JakeITFC |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:54 - Nov 3 by SomethingBlue |
Wonder if this what what the people of Ipswich had in mind when they voted, no doubt in good faith in most cases, for Tom Hunt to represent the town in parliament. |
I've written to Mr Hunt to ask for his rationale. |  | | |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:22 - Nov 3 with 1510 views | tractordownsouth |
| Rules are for the little people on 15:55 - Nov 3 by itfcjoe |
Such a silly move by them, it's the point where arrogance just clouds judgement so much because this is sort of thing that will come back to bite when all of a sudden all the sleaze becomes too much
If he's have served his suspension and then come back no one would have even remembered this by time next GE comes around - it stinks |
And had he been subject to a recall petition due to his suspension, the Tories have a 20k majority in his seat so it's not as if they would have risked a defeat. |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:22 - Nov 3 with 1499 views | footers |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:20 - Nov 3 by JakeITFC |
I've written to Mr Hunt to ask for his rationale. |
'boris told me to lol' | |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:23 - Nov 3 with 1504 views | itfcjoe |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:20 - Nov 3 by JakeITFC |
I've written to Mr Hunt to ask for his rationale. |
Dr Poulter doesn't reply to anything I send - I've only written to him about Cummings affair, then 2 times (and chased) about genuine constituency matters - but since Cummings where I got the C+P reply I must be on some do not respond list | |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:23 - Nov 3 with 1489 views | tractordownsouth |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:20 - Nov 3 by JakeITFC |
I've written to Mr Hunt to ask for his rationale. |
Presumably the response will be something along the lines of:
"Rules are for woke cultural marxists. Drink your libtard tears." [Post edited 3 Nov 2021 16:24]
| |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:46 - Nov 3 with 1407 views | Illinoisblue |
A new twist in the era of no consequences. Even if there are consequences there won’t be for long. This is dangerous stuff. |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:47 - Nov 3 with 1395 views | monytowbray |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:46 - Nov 3 by Illinoisblue |
A new twist in the era of no consequences. Even if there are consequences there won’t be for long. This is dangerous stuff. |
Could be worse, could be Corbyn! |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:59 - Nov 3 with 1355 views | giant_stow |
I just hope the silver lining is that this gives Labour a nice target to aim at. |  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 17:02 - Nov 3 with 1345 views | hype313 |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:59 - Nov 3 by giant_stow |
I just hope the silver lining is that this gives Labour a nice target to aim at. |
|  |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 17:03 - Nov 3 with 1331 views | giant_stow |
| Rules are for the little people on 17:02 - Nov 3 by hype313 |
|
really hope hes right - gawd knows we need something to change the momentum. | |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 18:22 - Nov 3 with 1240 views | Illinoisblue |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:59 - Nov 3 by giant_stow |
I just hope the silver lining is that this gives Labour a nice target to aim at. |
Are Labour still a thing? Hard to tell | |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 18:25 - Nov 3 with 1235 views | footers |
| Rules are for the little people on 18:22 - Nov 3 by Illinoisblue |
Are Labour still a thing? Hard to tell |
They're basically the Tories but offer a few more sops to appear 'progressive'. They also have no policies which is a bit of a disadvantage for a political party when asking people to vote for them.
Good to see the Greens polling well though. | |
| |
| Rules are for the little people on 19:29 - Nov 3 with 1145 views | eireblue |
| Rules are for the little people on 16:20 - Nov 3 by JakeITFC |
I've written to Mr Hunt to ask for his rationale. |
Seems reasonable to ask an MP that voted for this, are they currently also involved in similar activity. |  | | |
| Rules are for the little people on 20:39 - Nov 3 with 1046 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Rules are for the little people on 19:29 - Nov 3 by eireblue |
Seems reasonable to ask an MP that voted for this, are they currently also involved in similar activity. |
This is a superb idea.
We should flood the Inbox every MP who voted for this with the question:
"How many activities that would fall foul of an independent inquiry are you involved in personally?"
Their actions have made it abundantly clear for all to see that they do not care about corruption. The big question is, do enough of the electorate care? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
