| Kane to Man City for 160million 23:43 - Jul 22 with 5078 views | Illinoisblue |
Facking hell |  |
| |  |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:51 - Jul 22 with 4272 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Seen the reports, but not sure I would take it at face value.
Can't see city paying 160m for 28 year old Kane.
...but it is football, so who knows. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:54 - Jul 22 with 4249 views | Illinoisblue |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:51 - Jul 22 by Marshalls_Mullet |
Seen the reports, but not sure I would take it at face value.
Can't see city paying 160m for 28 year old Kane.
...but it is football, so who knows. |
Not sure The Sun would splash it on the front page if they weren’t sure. Insane money. And ever more reason to despise Man City | |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:57 - Jul 22 with 4231 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:51 - Jul 22 by Marshalls_Mullet |
Seen the reports, but not sure I would take it at face value.
Can't see city paying 160m for 28 year old Kane.
...but it is football, so who knows. |
Yeah, same here
For all the talk of Man City splashing the cash their record signing is still KDB for £68m. They also tend to buy up and coming players hitting their peak - 8 of their top 10 fees were for players aged 25 or under. Kane just doesn’t fit the profile that they’ve typically gone after, and that’s before you factor in that Pep finally got his long-desired strikerless setup to gel last season
File under believe it when I see it, but as you say I’ve long ceased being surprised by football! |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 00:04 - Jul 23 with 4191 views | SitfcB |
Really hope he’s a success away from Tottenham, sure he will be. Deserves trophies. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 05:51 - Jul 23 with 3913 views | textbackup |
160m for a bloke who froze in the euro final, stayed as far from the 2 CBs as he could and sat in CM for 80% of the game..... |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 06:10 - Jul 23 with 3881 views | MerseyBlue |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 05:51 - Jul 23 by textbackup |
160m for a bloke who froze in the euro final, stayed as far from the 2 CBs as he could and sat in CM for 80% of the game..... |
The money involved is ridiculous, but then so is pretty much every transfer at that level now. If we'd have won the final he would have been praised for serving the team with his performance, even if he didn't do the thing he's most famous for - score goals. His role drastically changed last season and he still ended up on 18 goals and the most assists in the league. Not to mention he consistently scores above his expected goals - he'd take Man City to another level, which is the main reason I don't want him to go there, but hard to argue he wouldn't deserve the move. [Post edited 23 Jul 2021 6:10]
|  |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 06:12 - Jul 23 with 3867 views | gainsboroughblue |
Football is utterly ludicrous. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 06:51 - Jul 23 with 3754 views | GeoffSentence |
BBC are saying player plus cash deal is likely |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 07:31 - Jul 23 with 3581 views | CaptainAhab |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 06:51 - Jul 23 by GeoffSentence |
BBC are saying player plus cash deal is likely |
Which player though? They were talking about Sterling before the Euros, but surely not now? |  | | |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 07:37 - Jul 23 with 3541 views | hype313 |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:57 - Jul 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Yeah, same here
For all the talk of Man City splashing the cash their record signing is still KDB for £68m. They also tend to buy up and coming players hitting their peak - 8 of their top 10 fees were for players aged 25 or under. Kane just doesn’t fit the profile that they’ve typically gone after, and that’s before you factor in that Pep finally got his long-desired strikerless setup to gel last season
File under believe it when I see it, but as you say I’ve long ceased being surprised by football! |
Thats all very well and good, but the ownership are desperate for CL success, and can easily afford Kane. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 07:39 - Jul 23 with 3526 views | itfcjoe |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 07:37 - Jul 23 by hype313 |
Thats all very well and good, but the ownership are desperate for CL success, and can easily afford Kane. |
I think due to covid FFP is being relaxed for a year or two which gives City licence to spend £250m this window |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 07:40 - Jul 23 with 3508 views | chrismakin |
You could buy a fair few Drinans for that. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:03 - Jul 23 with 3383 views | Garv |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:57 - Jul 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Yeah, same here
For all the talk of Man City splashing the cash their record signing is still KDB for £68m. They also tend to buy up and coming players hitting their peak - 8 of their top 10 fees were for players aged 25 or under. Kane just doesn’t fit the profile that they’ve typically gone after, and that’s before you factor in that Pep finally got his long-desired strikerless setup to gel last season
File under believe it when I see it, but as you say I’ve long ceased being surprised by football! |
Wasn't even that much. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/33686731
City buy well.
Not convinced Kane's worth it. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:25 - Jul 23 with 3285 views | homer_123 |
No, the real scandal is £400k a week.....#obscene |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:37 - Jul 23 with 3210 views | WD19 |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 06:51 - Jul 23 by GeoffSentence |
BBC are saying player plus cash deal is likely |
Richard Wright going the other way as a £50m makeweight in the deal. |  | | |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:39 - Jul 23 with 3188 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 06:51 - Jul 23 by GeoffSentence |
BBC are saying player plus cash deal is likely |
Don't know why any player would want to swap City for Spurs. A club, much like Arsenal, that is drifting further away from the elite by the season. | | | |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:48 - Jul 23 with 3121 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:25 - Jul 23 by homer_123 |
No, the real scandal is £400k a week.....#obscene |
De Bruyne is already on that, and Sterling not far off.
...it is obscene though. | |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:50 - Jul 23 with 3110 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:57 - Jul 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Yeah, same here
For all the talk of Man City splashing the cash their record signing is still KDB for £68m. They also tend to buy up and coming players hitting their peak - 8 of their top 10 fees were for players aged 25 or under. Kane just doesn’t fit the profile that they’ve typically gone after, and that’s before you factor in that Pep finally got his long-desired strikerless setup to gel last season
File under believe it when I see it, but as you say I’ve long ceased being surprised by football! |
They were pretty awful to watch at times with that striker less set up, and I think it became far less effective towards the end of the season. | |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:52 - Jul 23 with 3088 views | ElderGrizzly |
And Daniel Levy will replace him Bajner on a free... |  | | |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:54 - Jul 23 with 3066 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:39 - Jul 23 by tractorboy1978 |
Don't know why any player would want to swap City for Spurs. A club, much like Arsenal, that is drifting further away from the elite by the season. |
Like Arsenal, overspent on their stadium and now need to pay for it by selling players and buying not very good replacements
Didn't their stadium go from £500m to nearly £1bn? [Post edited 23 Jul 2021 8:55]
| | | |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:56 - Jul 23 with 3054 views | Simonds92 |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 23:54 - Jul 22 by Illinoisblue |
Not sure The Sun would splash it on the front page if they weren’t sure. Insane money. And ever more reason to despise Man City |
It's not as if the sun are famous for being completely incorrect about things. | | | |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:02 - Jul 23 with 3000 views | giant_stow |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:54 - Jul 23 by ElderGrizzly |
Like Arsenal, overspent on their stadium and now need to pay for it by selling players and buying not very good replacements
Didn't their stadium go from £500m to nearly £1bn? [Post edited 23 Jul 2021 8:55]
|
The perils of being a London club. Haven't Chelsea quietly ditched their own stadium redevelopment due to costs?
Maybe man unt will be next to face this problem if what I read about old Trafford getting knackered is true? |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:44 - Jul 23 with 2862 views | Scuzzer |
Obscene.
That is why I believe Man City are the image of all that is wrong in football. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:46 - Jul 23 with 2842 views | Coco |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:44 - Jul 23 by Scuzzer |
Obscene.
That is why I believe Man City are the image of all that is wrong in football. |
Emulating Chelsea of course. |  |
| |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 09:50 - Jul 23 with 2814 views | chicoazul |
| Kane to Man City for 160million on 08:25 - Jul 23 by homer_123 |
No, the real scandal is £400k a week.....#obscene |
He’ll pay 40% in tax though which pays for many many George Smileys. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
