| So what was it today??? 17:14 - Oct 2 with 617 views | unstableblue |
1. Have the better quality players
2. Have more confidence, energy and desire to win?
3. Have the better system and shape
Clearly it’s not 1
First half sounded 2, to make it 2-0
Second half worryingly sounded 3 |  |
| |  |
| So what was it today??? on 17:17 - Oct 2 with 564 views | N2_Blue |
The manager is a bit lost in how to get a tune out of this squad.
Basically he has an idea / formation and it worked out most of his previous clubs, bingo lots of success.
Unfortunately it's not working here and he has no idea how to adapt and change approach. - not quite as good a manager as he thought he was
It leaves us b*gered and having the occasional win but nothing more than that. |  |
| |
| So what was it today??? on 17:20 - Oct 2 with 537 views | gordon |
Shape just doesn't make sense to me - for a game like that we needed two pacy, hard working wingers, a mobile, physical centre-forward, and three midfielders scrapping to grab hold of the game in the middle.
We had a really good mobile physical centre-forward, one pacy, hard-working winger, and one centre midfielder scrapping on his own to get hold of the game. |  | | |
| Well Paul Cook is firmly stating it is point 2 on 22:31 - Oct 2 with 410 views | unstableblue |
After the thumping of Doncaster, a team building few days at the old Man U training ground… you really are not expecting a lacklustre and energy less display from your players
But the manager does have a role in firing the players up, and setting a system that means when players have an off day you don’t lose, or don’t throw away a lead.
I sense the Accrington manager DID fire his team up to own point 2 and want the game more.
As repeated in a Pepe Guardiola player interview extract - the number 1 demand is 100% energy through a game, a completely non negotiable expectation | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
