Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Ball V Johnson 09:57 - Dec 23 with 383 viewsNo9

This raises a number of questions about who appointed these judges in the case against Johnson.

https://brexitjustice.us19.list-manage.com/track/click?u=fcdcd9a84174e6e6cdafe6c

Now that Baroness hale has raised a number of concerns about the politicisation of the judiciary why aren't we better in formed and more concerned about wheree this might go to?
0

Ball V Johnson on 10:15 - Dec 23 with 346 viewsHARRY10

Rather concerning, if only that it is not surprising. And it does rather suggest Johnson is only a front and a mouthpiece for others.

There is still the matter of the Russian influence in UK elections report, and the charge against him over alleged fraudulent payments to his previous floozy and her 'tech' business.
1
Ball V Johnson on 13:06 - Dec 23 with 281 viewsNo9

Ball V Johnson on 10:15 - Dec 23 by HARRY10

Rather concerning, if only that it is not surprising. And it does rather suggest Johnson is only a front and a mouthpiece for others.

There is still the matter of the Russian influence in UK elections report, and the charge against him over alleged fraudulent payments to his previous floozy and her 'tech' business.


The tories links to wealthy Russians are not private but not really well publicesed either
Mr Johnsons personal links are less obvious
This really confirms the establishment protects and promotes its own
the rest of us can go to hell in a handcart
0

Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2020