| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for 14:08 - Jun 19 with 2502 views | SWGF |
Frankie Kent and Sammie Szmodics. Thought Szmodics was off to Bournemouth....! |  |
| |  |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:10 - Jun 19 with 2089 views | Paul_Knows |
They would be 2 really good signings for Peterborough. McAnthony really backing Ferguson this transfer window. |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:12 - Jun 19 with 2066 views | Reuser_is_God |
We really ought to be looking at both of these. |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:28 - Jun 19 with 1987 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
What positions is Szmodics?
I know he's attacking midfield, is he central or wide?
If central, we already have Judge, Bishop and Nolan in that role, so I wouldn't see us spending money on him. |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:39 - Jun 19 with 1940 views | Fixed_It |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:28 - Jun 19 by Marshalls_Mullet |
What positions is Szmodics?
I know he's attacking midfield, is he central or wide?
If central, we already have Judge, Bishop and Nolan in that role, so I wouldn't see us spending money on him. |
Agreed. Would we want to let any of those go to get him in? Not sure we would. |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:41 - Jun 19 with 1922 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:28 - Jun 19 by Marshalls_Mullet |
What positions is Szmodics?
I know he's attacking midfield, is he central or wide?
If central, we already have Judge, Bishop and Nolan in that role, so I wouldn't see us spending money on him. |
I wouldn't see us spending money on anyone..... |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:44 - Jun 19 with 1899 views | Wickets |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:28 - Jun 19 by Marshalls_Mullet |
What positions is Szmodics?
I know he's attacking midfield, is he central or wide?
If central, we already have Judge, Bishop and Nolan in that role, so I wouldn't see us spending money on him. |
I dont think we will be spending money on anyone ! |  | | |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:56 - Jun 19 with 1853 views | itfcjoe |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:12 - Jun 19 by Reuser_is_God |
We really ought to be looking at both of these. |
Kent too sloppy defensively for me, but would sign Szmodics in a heartbeat - should be signed him years ago |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:05 - Jun 19 with 1795 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:44 - Jun 19 by Wickets |
I dont think we will be spending money on anyone ! |
I've no issue with getting good free's. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:05 - Jun 19 with 1798 views | chicoazul |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 14:56 - Jun 19 by itfcjoe |
Kent too sloppy defensively for me, but would sign Szmodics in a heartbeat - should be signed him years ago |
Courtney Senior is the one. |  |
| Words are a medium that reduces reality to abstraction for transmission to our reason, and in their power to corrode reality inevitably lurks the danger that the words will be corroded too. It might be more appropriate, in fact, to liken their action to excessive stomach fluids that digest and gradually eat away the stomach itself. |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:07 - Jun 19 with 1771 views | Paul_Knows |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:05 - Jun 19 by chicoazul |
Courtney Senior is the one. |
Been linked with a few Championship sides, hasn't he? | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:10 - Jun 19 with 1772 views | christiand |
Peterborough's scouting team is terrific. They just seem to continually pick up bargains and then sell them on for a hefty profit a season or two later. I do look on at them with envy from that point of view. |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:17 - Jun 19 with 1716 views | Paul_Knows |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:10 - Jun 19 by christiand |
Peterborough's scouting team is terrific. They just seem to continually pick up bargains and then sell them on for a hefty profit a season or two later. I do look on at them with envy from that point of view. |
I agree with that to a degree, and I imagine it has lined McAnthony's pockets quite well, but they haven't really had all that much success on the pitch, albeit one season in the Championship a few years ago. [Post edited 19 Jun 15:17]
| |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:22 - Jun 19 with 1664 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:10 - Jun 19 by christiand |
Peterborough's scouting team is terrific. They just seem to continually pick up bargains and then sell them on for a hefty profit a season or two later. I do look on at them with envy from that point of view. |
Agree that they do a good job.
Not sure Szmodics needed 'scouting'. | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:49 - Jun 19 with 1543 views | Illinoisblue |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:17 - Jun 19 by Paul_Knows |
I agree with that to a degree, and I imagine it has lined McAnthony's pockets quite well, but they haven't really had all that much success on the pitch, albeit one season in the Championship a few years ago. [Post edited 19 Jun 15:17]
|
indeed. they seem to be a perennial league 1 fringe-of-playoffs club who flog a couple of youngsters for a few million each year. Very good at spotting non-league talent. Not very good at doing anything useful with it. |  |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:17 - Jun 19 with 1426 views | christiand |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:17 - Jun 19 by Paul_Knows |
I agree with that to a degree, and I imagine it has lined McAnthony's pockets quite well, but they haven't really had all that much success on the pitch, albeit one season in the Championship a few years ago. [Post edited 19 Jun 15:17]
|
Is that not because the talent is then sold off to the highest bidder? A job well done on their part. | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:21 - Jun 19 with 1405 views | Paul_Knows |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:17 - Jun 19 by christiand |
Is that not because the talent is then sold off to the highest bidder? A job well done on their part. |
But if the talent is that good in the first place (which it is), then why aren't they getting promoted? I appreciate that its no fun having a team ripped apart and starting again, but they at least have a decent squad together for a season, so why isn't it getting promoted before being torn apart? | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:30 - Jun 19 with 1374 views | christiand |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:21 - Jun 19 by Paul_Knows |
But if the talent is that good in the first place (which it is), then why aren't they getting promoted? I appreciate that its no fun having a team ripped apart and starting again, but they at least have a decent squad together for a season, so why isn't it getting promoted before being torn apart? |
Must impact on the team seeing players coming and going? For me, I feel Peterborough are punching above their weight now, just outside the League One play off places generally. Managers change quite regularly at London Road too, that can’t be a helpful factor either. | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:31 - Jun 19 with 1369 views | PhilTWTD |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 15:10 - Jun 19 by christiand |
Peterborough's scouting team is terrific. They just seem to continually pick up bargains and then sell them on for a hefty profit a season or two later. I do look on at them with envy from that point of view. |
Mainly been down to Barry Fry over the years. |  | | |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:55 - Jun 19 with 1258 views | strikalite |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:21 - Jun 19 by Paul_Knows |
But if the talent is that good in the first place (which it is), then why aren't they getting promoted? I appreciate that its no fun having a team ripped apart and starting again, but they at least have a decent squad together for a season, so why isn't it getting promoted before being torn apart? |
Consistency, on their day even last season they still turn a team over no problem, but if they're not on their game especially at home they look void of ideas, injuries didn't help, throw in a bit of luck too and yes you need it and they finish 7th, they dropped so many points at home last season to bottom six sides...
Gates of 6k ish, they'll always struggle and higher than League One anyway.. |  | | |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:58 - Jun 19 with 1243 views | MrTown |
People were saying he’s too good for us. Will be making a bigger step up than us blah blah.
How are they paying a fee for Smzodics, he’s a free agent? |  | | |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:58 - Jun 19 with 1240 views | Paul_Knows |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:30 - Jun 19 by christiand |
Must impact on the team seeing players coming and going? For me, I feel Peterborough are punching above their weight now, just outside the League One play off places generally. Managers change quite regularly at London Road too, that can’t be a helpful factor either. |
Well quite, so the only real success from it is McAnthony lining his own pockets (although he does still spend a fair bit).
Their model is decent, but other clubs have good models, and success with it (see Norwich, Swansea and Southampton to name 3 from recent seasons). [Post edited 19 Jun 16:59]
| |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:59 - Jun 19 with 1235 views | Paul_Knows |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:58 - Jun 19 by MrTown |
People were saying he’s too good for us. Will be making a bigger step up than us blah blah.
How are they paying a fee for Smzodics, he’s a free agent? |
I think Smzodics had a years option in his deal, which Col U (obviously) took up, but it wasn't fully disclosed .... pretty sure I read that somewhere. | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 17:16 - Jun 19 with 1148 views | Illinoisblue |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:55 - Jun 19 by strikalite |
Consistency, on their day even last season they still turn a team over no problem, but if they're not on their game especially at home they look void of ideas, injuries didn't help, throw in a bit of luck too and yes you need it and they finish 7th, they dropped so many points at home last season to bottom six sides...
Gates of 6k ish, they'll always struggle and higher than League One anyway.. |
on their day, they could easily batter someone 7-1 | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 17:24 - Jun 19 with 1120 views | christiand |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:58 - Jun 19 by Paul_Knows |
Well quite, so the only real success from it is McAnthony lining his own pockets (although he does still spend a fair bit).
Their model is decent, but other clubs have good models, and success with it (see Norwich, Swansea and Southampton to name 3 from recent seasons). [Post edited 19 Jun 16:59]
|
But they’re doing it lower down the leagues, with less money. That’s where their scouting comes into play. | |
| |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 17:52 - Jun 19 with 1065 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Peterborough have agreed fees with Col Who for on 16:58 - Jun 19 by Paul_Knows |
Well quite, so the only real success from it is McAnthony lining his own pockets (although he does still spend a fair bit).
Their model is decent, but other clubs have good models, and success with it (see Norwich, Swansea and Southampton to name 3 from recent seasons). [Post edited 19 Jun 16:59]
|
It's much the same with Brentford - they are lauded for their model and rightfully so, but it has not delivered any tangible success on the pitch. | | | |
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads. | |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
