EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... 12:24 - Jun 9 with 2397 views | ITFCBlues | 150k. Few interesting snippets in here as well |  |
| |  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:25 - Jun 9 with 2327 views | chrismakin | And this is why Ashton is so important. Amazing business. |  |
|  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:38 - Jun 9 with 2165 views | Illinoisblue | Where does it mention 150k ? |  |
|  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:44 - Jun 9 with 2080 views | SamWhiteUK |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:38 - Jun 9 by Illinoisblue | Where does it mention 150k ? |
I can't see it either. I can just see "low six figure region" |  | |  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:46 - Jun 9 with 2041 views | MrTown |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:38 - Jun 9 by Illinoisblue | Where does it mention 150k ? |
I don't think it does unless I am missing something. States "understood to be in the low six-figure region". Still sounds like exceptional business, but doesn't look like fee disclosed. |  |
|  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:46 - Jun 9 with 2029 views | Beckets |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:44 - Jun 9 by SamWhiteUK | I can't see it either. I can just see "low six figure region" |
He's made £150k figure up by the looks of it. Makin fell for it! |  | |  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:50 - Jun 9 with 1958 views | chrismakin |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:46 - Jun 9 by Beckets | He's made £150k figure up by the looks of it. Makin fell for it! |
? I didn't write the OP |  |
|  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:51 - Jun 9 with 1953 views | portmanking |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:46 - Jun 9 by MrTown | I don't think it does unless I am missing something. States "understood to be in the low six-figure region". Still sounds like exceptional business, but doesn't look like fee disclosed. |
Nope. He hasn't made it up. In Warren's initial edit it definitely said £150k. He must have edited it in the last 30 mins. |  | |  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 13:03 - Jun 9 with 1788 views | Illinoisblue |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:51 - Jun 9 by portmanking | Nope. He hasn't made it up. In Warren's initial edit it definitely said £150k. He must have edited it in the last 30 mins. |
Strange fuss over a low fee. Wonder if the club have asked media to not report fees (although if the selling club mention the fee that won’t really work) |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 13:14 - Jun 9 with 1664 views | HighgateBlue |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 13:03 - Jun 9 by Illinoisblue | Strange fuss over a low fee. Wonder if the club have asked media to not report fees (although if the selling club mention the fee that won’t really work) |
The contract between the clubs can easily contain a confidentiality clause. If that is so (and one would imagine it is, if the club has not announced the fee and are treating it as officially undisclosed) then it would explain why the press would agree to take it down so quickly - presumably it was leaked in breach of confidence by some low rent employee. Or it was made up and untrue, of course... |  | |  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 15:24 - Jun 9 with 1228 views | Millsey | I’ll sleep soundly now I know how much we paid for him 😔 |  | |  |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 19:48 - Jun 9 with 855 views | HighgateBlue |
EADT piece on Burns reporting fee was... on 12:25 - Jun 9 by chrismakin | And this is why Ashton is so important. Amazing business. |
/If/ that is right, then yes, amazing business. It's just £1k a week over a three year deal. really good business for a player that Cook clearly rates, who's at a good age. I've not seen much of him, but he looked a tidy player. |  | |  |
| |