| Lower tier 14:51 - Oct 7 with 698 views | itfc_bucks |
Probably been done before, but why is it no under 6s in the SAR lower but under 13s in the North stand lower?
I've always taken my kids to the SAR, but only noticed that restriction today. Has it always been that? |  | | |  |
| Lower tier on 15:03 - Oct 7 with 641 views | TractorCam |
Because North Stand is standing, which is funny as technically persistent standing isn't allowed. |  |
| |
| Lower tier on 15:07 - Oct 7 with 617 views | Rozz |
Presumably because stray shots end up in the crowd behind the goal, and at 6 & under the risks of injury are more severe?
Just a guess. [Post edited 7 Oct 2022 15:07]
|  | | |
| Lower tier on 15:10 - Oct 7 with 611 views | SitfcB |
Thought it was U5s?
And it’s because of stray balls, but the club say they don’t ‘knowingly’ sell tickets to U5s in lower tiers.
No U13s in SBRL because of adult behaviour innit. |  |
| |
| Lower tier on 15:19 - Oct 7 with 559 views | Matt_Netherlands |
Wronguns. Too many wronguns in the lower tiers. |  | | |
| Lower tier on 15:24 - Oct 7 with 547 views | textbackup |
Would any parent with a brain really want their kid sat in the NS lower for every home game?
Firstly it’s an awful view, and second the swearing, and thirdly, they’d see Jack sht with adults standing around them. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
