Forum | A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. by BanksterDebtSlave

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. 11:04 - Aug 21 with 4287 views

How do we think he did?

	"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll:	Do you wipe after having a piss?

A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. on 22:19 - Aug 21 with 454 views

FrimleyBlue

A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. on 22:05 - Aug 21 by BanksterDebtSlave
Does this heat map tell you anything about tracking back? https://www.followfollow.com/forum/threads/possible-gers-move-for-ipswich-loanee

Got spot there. Anyone seen any for Harness. Will be interesting to see how it differs he certainly does seem to get back a lot. And definitely seems to give the lwb more protection.

	a niche perspective
Poll:	We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog:	Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. on 22:48 - Aug 21 with 393 views

XYZ

A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. on 22:08 - Aug 21 by FrimleyBlue

I think this is the key SB. It's peoples feelings and their own opinions. The tracking back for example could vary itself between posters. Do they expect an AM to track back to our own box or just track and follow a particular player.

I don't personally remember seeing many call him lazy specifically. But I still stand by he had areas to improve off the ball which KM also picked up on and mentioned.

But personally... your thoughts on burgess are no different to many others and something I personally share with you. But the reason I've brought in the celina discussions is that you were so intent on people providing evidence when this is just a site for people to share their thoughts as you have here without the pressing need to become KM and to provide documentation to defend your personal beliefs.

lol, TWTD has demanded Evidence for many a year.

Ha! Irony overload. (n/t) on 23:44 - Aug 21 with 369 views

SitfcB

Ha! Irony overload. (n/t) on 20:23 - Aug 21 by Bloots

Indeed. Made me chuckle.

	COYB
Poll:	What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog:	[Blog] One Year On

A lot of chatter about Burgess before the game. on 02:30 - Aug 22 with 331 views

Kropotkin123

I don't get the Burgess "chatter". Maybe it is because I didn't really see his games last season, as I was settling in to a new country.

So far this season Burgess has played 2 games and Edmundson has played 4. Within those games Burgess has made 4 tackles and Edmundson has made 3. Burgess has won 8 aerial duels, Edmundson has won 7. Burgess' passing accuracy has been 83.6%, Edmundson's has been 78%.

Burgess has made 4 interceptions, Edmundson 5. Burgess has made 3 clearances, Edmundson 4.

Burgess has committed 5 fouls, Edmundson 4.

Stats are stats, interpretations are interpretations. It is easy to initially say Burgess has generally done more in the games his been involved in. But we were in total control against MK Dons, winning the ball back further up the field through midfielders, attackers and wing backs. So not considering this does Edmundson a disservice.

Passing accuracy is interesting. Edmundson's passing is worse over the four games. But we know is passing accuracy (61.2% from 49 passes) was dreadful in the Burton compared to his normal standards. However it was 94.3% from 53 passes against FGR. Take the Burton anomaly out of the running and his accuracy rises to 83.6%. Exactly the same as Burgess across his 2 games!

From what I've seen so far this season, I don't think there has been much between them, which is good. We want strength in depth and he seems good enough to help us get out of this division.

[Post edited 22 Aug 2022 2:33]

	Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top.
Poll:	Would you rather
Blog:	Round Four: Eagle

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread