| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP 21:53 - Nov 25 with 10835 views | SitfcB |
It’s suddenly all ok.
They were the happy clappers and the Bob Marley singers when Lambert got us relegated. |  |
| |  |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:29 - Nov 26 with 1588 views | noggin |
I'm not sure what the point of this OP is. Anyone care to explain? |  |
| |
| Yeh on 09:35 - Nov 26 with 1572 views | Dyland |
| Yeh on 09:20 - Nov 26 by footers |
Indeed. It was good to see their efforts to energise the fanbase, not just at PR too.
But what is the point of our supporters trust exactly? |
It's a good question. I don't see they are doing anything at all? |  |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:36 - Nov 26 with 1573 views | Herbivore |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:29 - Nov 26 by noggin |
I'm not sure what the point of this OP is. Anyone care to explain? |
Sitters is a bit bitter over Blue Action as they stole Section 6's thunder. I think that's what it is anyway. |  |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:37 - Nov 26 with 1573 views | SitfcB |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:36 - Nov 26 by Herbivore |
Sitters is a bit bitter over Blue Action as they stole Section 6's thunder. I think that's what it is anyway. |
No.
It’s to do with how blue fish and many others got shot down about being anti-Lambert etc
I wish fishers was here to say I told you so. | |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:38 - Nov 26 with 1572 views | Herbivore |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:37 - Nov 26 by SitfcB |
No.
It’s to do with how blue fish and many others got shot down about being anti-Lambert etc
I wish fishers was here to say I told you so. |
Fishers got stick because he acted like a bellend, not because he was anti-Lambert. | |
| |
| Yeh on 09:39 - Nov 26 with 1568 views | itfcjoe |
| Yeh on 09:35 - Nov 26 by Dyland |
It's a good question. I don't see they are doing anything at all? |
There is no point in it, I was on it and tried to re-emergise it a couple of years ago but was like pushing water up a hill - there's not motivation for anything to be done about it by those in charge |  |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:41 - Nov 26 with 1554 views | noggin |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:37 - Nov 26 by SitfcB |
No.
It’s to do with how blue fish and many others got shot down about being anti-Lambert etc
I wish fishers was here to say I told you so. |
So everyone should stop their support for the manager when some internet gobsh1te tells them to? | |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:41 - Nov 26 with 1557 views | Dubtractor |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:38 - Nov 26 by Herbivore |
Fishers got stick because he acted like a bellend, not because he was anti-Lambert. |
Yep. Compare that with Bloots, who has been vocally anti Lambert for ages, and who doesn't get any stick at all for it.
I don't mind Fishers, but crikey he can be a bellend on here at times. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:43 - Nov 26 with 1538 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 07:31 - Nov 26 by Ace_High1 |
Read that this morning.
Thought two things let them down, the reference to "Shambert" dilutes the point a little as no need for personal insults.
Also the ending, what is this "uppa town" all about - range cringe worthy. |
Same as those that add "en" after a sentence.
I believe thats a Suffolk thing. Just odd. |  |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:44 - Nov 26 with 1538 views | footers |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:37 - Nov 26 by SitfcB |
No.
It’s to do with how blue fish and many others got shot down about being anti-Lambert etc
I wish fishers was here to say I told you so. |
As Spruce pointed out the other day, it's not like he had some special insight into anything. We all have eyes, ears and a brain (sometimes). So constantly banging on when most could see the writing's on the wall isn't going to endear you to anyone. |  |
| |
| Yeh on 09:44 - Nov 26 with 1538 views | Dyland |
| Yeh on 09:39 - Nov 26 by itfcjoe |
There is no point in it, I was on it and tried to re-emergise it a couple of years ago but was like pushing water up a hill - there's not motivation for anything to be done about it by those in charge |
People who like having a title but not doing any hard graft, is it? Or just people who lack the confrontational chops needed to make a difference? Or a mix of both maybe. | |
| |
| Yeh on 09:46 - Nov 26 with 1526 views | footers |
| Yeh on 09:39 - Nov 26 by itfcjoe |
There is no point in it, I was on it and tried to re-emergise it a couple of years ago but was like pushing water up a hill - there's not motivation for anything to be done about it by those in charge |
Depressing. What the feck is the point in it then? I can't remember hearing a peep out of them over the last few years, which is presumably why BA and others have had to step in. | |
| |
| Yeh on 09:46 - Nov 26 with 1523 views | SomethingBlue |
| Yeh on 09:44 - Nov 26 by Dyland |
People who like having a title but not doing any hard graft, is it? Or just people who lack the confrontational chops needed to make a difference? Or a mix of both maybe. |
A bit of all that and an absolute disgrace, to be honest. |  |
| |
| Yeh on 09:48 - Nov 26 with 1523 views | itfcjoe |
| Yeh on 09:44 - Nov 26 by Dyland |
People who like having a title but not doing any hard graft, is it? Or just people who lack the confrontational chops needed to make a difference? Or a mix of both maybe. |
I honestly have no idea what i was in the end - the committee ended up at about 12 people when there is about 200 members.
I resigned, and suggested everyone resign and seek re-election to a smaller streamlined board who actually are accountable to do things. They were the only meetings had in years, it's not right | |
| |
| Indeed, I should have put a copyright on "Shambert".... on 10:03 - Nov 26 with 1482 views | SuperCoops |
| Indeed, I should have put a copyright on "Shambert".... on 09:12 - Nov 26 by TheTrueBlue1878 |
In all honesty, his only next move I can see is north of the border somewhere. |
Next Celtic manager! Now that would be hilarious, especially as that job could be coming available soon. |  | | |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:06 - Nov 26 with 1479 views | SuperCoops |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:37 - Nov 26 by SitfcB |
No.
It’s to do with how blue fish and many others got shot down about being anti-Lambert etc
I wish fishers was here to say I told you so. |
Missing your boyfriend, aren't you?
It's not his "message" but the way he repeatedly, blinkeredly and mundanely went about it that annoyed people. He became obsessed with it and certainly wasn't a joke if you read his post histories here and elsewhere. | | | |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:08 - Nov 26 with 1469 views | BlueBadger |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 09:43 - Nov 26 by Wallingford_Boy |
Same as those that add "en" after a sentence.
I believe thats a Suffolk thing. Just odd. |
It's no kind of Suffolk thing I've ever come across.
I suspect it's probably a w@nker thing. |  |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:12 - Nov 26 with 1456 views | footers |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:08 - Nov 26 by BlueBadger |
It's no kind of Suffolk thing I've ever come across.
I suspect it's probably a w@nker thing. |
I believe some of it also stems from Troy... If aping the mannerisms of someone with autism is some kind of 'bantz' then it's not something I want any part of.
Only on tw@tter. | |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:14 - Nov 26 with 1444 views | noggin |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:12 - Nov 26 by footers |
I believe some of it also stems from Troy... If aping the mannerisms of someone with autism is some kind of 'bantz' then it's not something I want any part of.
Only on tw@tter. |
TBF I've heard people saying it for decades. | |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:18 - Nov 26 with 1433 views | SamWhiteUK |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 08:28 - Nov 26 by itfcjoe |
Personally I don't see why a new manager has to earn that support rather than just be given it as helps the club.
I know not everyone will agree with that.
I think most fans went into the start of last season with confidence that we'd have a good season and that Lambert had enough about him to ensure that - getting behind him was right.
I think the start of this season was too early to call for Lambert out, after Evans had clearly given him more time - but we have shown the same failings as last year now so need to act |
Exactly correct.
So many "supporters" on here seem to care more about being correct than supporting the club. The VAST majority on here wanted PL out at the end of last season, but he was given more time, so the only thing you can do there is get behind him and the team.
Now, it's become clear that it's time for him to go. However, rather than fans be united in this viewpoint, there are now people trying to divide the fanbase with posts that basically say "well, I wanted him out the whole time and you didn't so you're stupid and I'm right har de har har" |  | | |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:50 - Nov 26 with 1383 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 07:53 - Nov 26 by SitfcB |
Glad I’m not the only one, I hate that ‘Uppa Town’ thing. Think it’s meant to be a Suffolkism for Up the Town.
Just say Up The Town ffs. |
Agreed, we're not all from Suffolk! |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:51 - Nov 26 with 1374 views | Herbivore |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:18 - Nov 26 by SamWhiteUK |
Exactly correct.
So many "supporters" on here seem to care more about being correct than supporting the club. The VAST majority on here wanted PL out at the end of last season, but he was given more time, so the only thing you can do there is get behind him and the team.
Now, it's become clear that it's time for him to go. However, rather than fans be united in this viewpoint, there are now people trying to divide the fanbase with posts that basically say "well, I wanted him out the whole time and you didn't so you're stupid and I'm right har de har har" |
SUQ | |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:53 - Nov 26 with 1367 views | footers |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:50 - Nov 26 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Agreed, we're not all from Suffolk! |
Hang on... you're not Suffolkian?! Which part of the alien planet do you come from? | |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:53 - Nov 26 with 1366 views | wkj |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:53 - Nov 26 by footers |
Hang on... you're not Suffolkian?! Which part of the alien planet do you come from? |
Brexitshire maybe, the mask is slippery |  |
| |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 10:54 - Nov 26 with 1367 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| So because Blue Action are now saying FOPRP on 08:12 - Nov 26 by SitfcB |
They went too far with their support for him though.
I doubt it was even left up? |
I don't think you can go too far in supporting a new manager of a failing football club. He needed all the support he could get, and he can never complain he didn't get it. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
