| Judge & Huws 11:02 - Aug 9 with 721 views | Nazemariner |
Need these two on the pitch against the likes of Sunderland.
Diamond midfield anyone? |  | | |  |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 with 677 views | chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |  |
| I have it in commission, to comfort the feeble-minded, and to support the weak. You must needs go along with us; we will wait for you, we will lend you our help, we will deny ourselves of some things, both opinionated and practical, for your sake; we will not enter into doubtful disputations before you, we will be made all things to you, rather than you shall be left behind | | Poll: | How much are Phil Gav and the elusive Mark looking forward to next Friday? |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:17 - Aug 9 with 619 views | MrTown |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 by chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |
I wouldn't change the team, just Chambers in for Wilson. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:19 - Aug 9 with 615 views | TractorCam |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 by chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |
Let's not start shifting players to weaker positions.
Chamber for Wilson will do. Would love to see Huws in particular start but like you say no need to change the team that just won. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:22 - Aug 9 with 590 views | Terry_Nutkins |
It will be Chambers for Wilson and Judge for Jackson. He'll want to keep the ball more against Sunderland and have Judges quality. Jackson/Huws off the bench as required. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:24 - Aug 9 with 581 views | Guthrum |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 by chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |
That last being pretty much what Lambert said in the presser. We can't just throw Huws straight in full time given how long he's been on the sidelines. More useful to have a few cameos than for him to break down again. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:51 - Aug 9 with 468 views | braveblue |
One up front I would think with Judge coming in. No doubt Chambers will be back. Not inspiring but little choice. | | | |
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads. | |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
