| Judge & Huws 11:02 - Aug 9 with 610 views | Nazemariner |
Need these two on the pitch against the likes of Sunderland.
Diamond midfield anyone? |  | | |  |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 with 566 views | chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |  |
| Words are a medium that reduces reality to abstraction for transmission to our reason, and in their power to corrode reality inevitably lurks the danger that the words will be corroded too. It might be more appropriate, in fact, to liken their action to excessive stomach fluids that digest and gradually eat away the stomach itself. | | Poll: | How much are Phil Gav and the elusive Mark looking forward to next Friday? |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:17 - Aug 9 with 508 views | MrTown |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 by chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |
I wouldn't change the team, just Chambers in for Wilson. |  | | |
| Judge & Huws on 11:19 - Aug 9 with 504 views | TractorCam |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 by chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |
Let's not start shifting players to weaker positions.
Chamber for Wilson will do. Would love to see Huws in particular start but like you say no need to change the team that just won. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:22 - Aug 9 with 479 views | Terry_Nutkins |
It will be Chambers for Wilson and Judge for Jackson. He'll want to keep the ball more against Sunderland and have Judges quality. Jackson/Huws off the bench as required. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:24 - Aug 9 with 470 views | Guthrum |
| Judge & Huws on 11:10 - Aug 9 by chicoazul |
Nah. Seems unfair and unnecessary to radically change a team that just won away from home with a clean sheet, although I would have Chambers back for either Wilson or Donacien if Woolfenden can play at right back. Let's go with Rose Garbutt and Downes again. As good as Huws is he hasnt played for 2 years so needs to be broken in gradually with 20 minutes here and there rather than in at the start against our main rivals this early. |
That last being pretty much what Lambert said in the presser. We can't just throw Huws straight in full time given how long he's been on the sidelines. More useful to have a few cameos than for him to break down again. |  |
| |
| Judge & Huws on 11:51 - Aug 9 with 357 views | braveblue |
One up front I would think with Judge coming in. No doubt Chambers will be back. Not inspiring but little choice. | | | |
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads. | |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
