| Hypothetically speaking 10:31 - Feb 22 with 18584 views | blueasfook |
On the remote chance that labour had won the election...
I wonder what noises Comrade Corbyn would be making to the Russians over their illegal invasion of Ukraine.
He would probably side with them and wish them well. |  |
| |  |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:44 - Feb 23 with 729 views | lowhouseblue |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:42 - Feb 23 by Darth_Koont |
Unbelievable. |
even you know he was half hearted. when has a politician ever taken a week off in the middle of an election campaign? when he wasn't on holiday he was half-arsed. no one can really deny that. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:44 - Feb 23 with 728 views | Darth_Koont |
| Hypothetically speaking on 08:57 - Feb 23 by GlasgowBlue |
When confronted by reporters Mr Corbyn said he was present but not involved in the Butlins knobbly knees competition.
Mr Corbyn was then shown photos of him on stage with his son Tommy for the dads and lads competition, Mr Corbyn stated his attendance was a protest at the lack of gender neutral events at the Bognor Regis camp.
He then stormed off muttering something about Zionists. |
QED.
I’ll repeat the question to you: why do you have to lie, cheat and steal to push your political agenda?
Have some standards FFS. |  |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:46 - Feb 23 with 704 views | giant_stow |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:42 - Feb 23 by Darth_Koont |
Unbelievable. |
Did he not go on holiday then? Just had a google and it looks like Lowhouse is right... |  |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:48 - Feb 23 with 694 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:37 - Feb 23 by blueasfook |
Put me on ignore. Problem solved. |
But I'd miss your veracious and apposite political discourse. Like, "Let's just say he'd be the Paul Cook of prime ministers." Brilliant and thought provoking. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:50 - Feb 23 with 683 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:44 - Feb 23 by lowhouseblue |
even you know he was half hearted. when has a politician ever taken a week off in the middle of an election campaign? when he wasn't on holiday he was half-arsed. no one can really deny that. |
It wasn't a week off. Even the report you linked doesn't say that. Stop lying... and also, tell us what your job is. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:02 - Feb 23 with 659 views | giant_stow |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:46 - Feb 23 by giant_stow |
Did he not go on holiday then? Just had a google and it looks like Lowhouse is right... |
What am I missing Dolly / Darth?! Happy to be corrected... | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:03 - Feb 23 with 649 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:02 - Feb 23 by giant_stow |
What am I missing Dolly / Darth?! Happy to be corrected... |
It's there in Darth's links. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:05 - Feb 23 with 644 views | blueasfook |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:48 - Feb 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
But I'd miss your veracious and apposite political discourse. Like, "Let's just say he'd be the Paul Cook of prime ministers." Brilliant and thought provoking. |
Thank yoooooo xx | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:07 - Feb 23 with 624 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:44 - Feb 23 by Darth_Koont |
QED.
I’ll repeat the question to you: why do you have to lie, cheat and steal to push your political agenda?
Have some standards FFS. |
I wasn't being entirely serious about the Butlins knobbly knees competition Koonters. |  |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:09 - Feb 23 with 618 views | giant_stow |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:03 - Feb 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
It's there in Darth's links. |
I think I'm going crazy - read that link through twice and can't see any mention of holidays. Never mind. | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:10 - Feb 23 with 626 views | itfcjoe |
He would find a way to criticise NATO, without criticising Russia implicitly whichever way it goes.
If Russia subsequently didn't/don't attack it would have been proof that NATO/'The West' were the aggressors
If Russia did/does attack, it would have only been a retaliation to NATO/'The West' who were too aggressive
A useful idiot for the Russians. see also the Salisbury poisonings. |  |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:15 - Feb 23 with 593 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:07 - Feb 23 by GlasgowBlue |
I wasn't being entirely serious about the Butlins knobbly knees competition Koonters. |
No, you were using satire to perpetuate your lies and smears.
It worked, ultimately. We put the Great back into Great Britain! Hurrah!
I still find it funny how you campaigned so hard for the Tories, argued with long rambling posts against any opposition, lied and smeared and exaggerated when it suited... then when it became more apparent how sh!t the Tories were (for those who didn't already know) you just washed your hands of them. Brilliant.
People blame Corbyn for the government we have now, but no, it was the likes of you. Thanks. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:22 - Feb 23 with 567 views | Darth_Koont |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:10 - Feb 23 by itfcjoe |
He would find a way to criticise NATO, without criticising Russia implicitly whichever way it goes.
If Russia subsequently didn't/don't attack it would have been proof that NATO/'The West' were the aggressors
If Russia did/does attack, it would have only been a retaliation to NATO/'The West' who were too aggressive
A useful idiot for the Russians. see also the Salisbury poisonings. |
Maybe do some reading on the anti-war movement and pacifism. It starts at home.
CND weren’t campaigning for the Russians to disarm. What would have been the likelihood of that campaign succeeding? It was to put pressure on our own government and allies to de-escalate.
It’s a perfectly reasonable and evidenced belief that the UK and its approach around the world is part of the problem and something that can be changed. | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:23 - Feb 23 with 546 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:09 - Feb 23 by giant_stow |
I think I'm going crazy - read that link through twice and can't see any mention of holidays. Never mind. |
Sorry, I meant what he posted: "He had a long weekend over three weeks out from the referendum. The “two week holiday” nonsense was Swinson’s lie that you are repeating but can’t even back up here with the Times’ own allegation."
Corbyn took a neutral stance over Brexit - which I personally disagreed with but I understand his reasoning - unlike Boris, who switched purely for political gain.
Corbyn didn't "feck off on holiday for a fortnight" he took a long weekend, away from a campaign that was weeks and weeks, of not months. Given his neutral stance, and the length of the campaign, what difference did you expect those few days to make?
I can't explain it any more clearly so I hope you've got it now. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:24 - Feb 23 with 550 views | blueasfook |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:15 - Feb 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
No, you were using satire to perpetuate your lies and smears.
It worked, ultimately. We put the Great back into Great Britain! Hurrah!
I still find it funny how you campaigned so hard for the Tories, argued with long rambling posts against any opposition, lied and smeared and exaggerated when it suited... then when it became more apparent how sh!t the Tories were (for those who didn't already know) you just washed your hands of them. Brilliant.
People blame Corbyn for the government we have now, but no, it was the likes of you. Thanks. |
We voted tory to end the parliamentary deadlock of Brexit.
It served its purpose. Might vote for Starmer in the next election now the loony left have been swept out | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:27 - Feb 23 with 539 views | noggin |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:24 - Feb 23 by blueasfook |
We voted tory to end the parliamentary deadlock of Brexit.
It served its purpose. Might vote for Starmer in the next election now the loony left have been swept out |
"We voted tory to end the parliamentary deadlock of Brexit."
That's one way of putting it. |  |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:30 - Feb 23 with 519 views | blueasfook |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:27 - Feb 23 by noggin |
"We voted tory to end the parliamentary deadlock of Brexit."
That's one way of putting it. |
Here's another way then...
"We voted Tory to ensure Momentum-backed nutters like Corbyn and Abbott never got near Number 10" | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:33 - Feb 23 with 510 views | Darth_Koont |
| Hypothetically speaking on 09:46 - Feb 23 by giant_stow |
Did he not go on holiday then? Just had a google and it looks like Lowhouse is right... |
Be honest. You couldn’t be less interested in the truth.
A Labour spokesperson at the time said he went away for a long weekend, for three nights, a month before the referendum. No-one’s come up with evidence for anything else.
It’s Swinson’s lie repeated here by lowhouse that says he went off on holiday.
This basic dishonesty is why we have utterly useless politics and this current government and its non-opposition. Not to mention the long-term damage of follies like Brexit or underfunding society. Stop perpetuating it. | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:33 - Feb 23 with 496 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:27 - Feb 23 by noggin |
"We voted tory to end the parliamentary deadlock of Brexit."
That's one way of putting it. |
It's like shooting yourself in the face to remove a spot. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:35 - Feb 23 with 496 views | giant_stow |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:33 - Feb 23 by Darth_Koont |
Be honest. You couldn’t be less interested in the truth.
A Labour spokesperson at the time said he went away for a long weekend, for three nights, a month before the referendum. No-one’s come up with evidence for anything else.
It’s Swinson’s lie repeated here by lowhouse that says he went off on holiday.
This basic dishonesty is why we have utterly useless politics and this current government and its non-opposition. Not to mention the long-term damage of follies like Brexit or underfunding society. Stop perpetuating it. |
No need to go personal Darth - we're just chatting.
A long weekend away during a major generational referendum isn't acceptable in my book. 3 nights away which the leader of the opposition should have spent working. Sorry. | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:38 - Feb 23 with 480 views | Darth_Koont |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:35 - Feb 23 by giant_stow |
No need to go personal Darth - we're just chatting.
A long weekend away during a major generational referendum isn't acceptable in my book. 3 nights away which the leader of the opposition should have spent working. Sorry. |
Yeah right.
You’re just being silly now because you wanted to believe the lie. | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:38 - Feb 23 with 475 views | giant_stow |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:23 - Feb 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Sorry, I meant what he posted: "He had a long weekend over three weeks out from the referendum. The “two week holiday” nonsense was Swinson’s lie that you are repeating but can’t even back up here with the Times’ own allegation."
Corbyn took a neutral stance over Brexit - which I personally disagreed with but I understand his reasoning - unlike Boris, who switched purely for political gain.
Corbyn didn't "feck off on holiday for a fortnight" he took a long weekend, away from a campaign that was weeks and weeks, of not months. Given his neutral stance, and the length of the campaign, what difference did you expect those few days to make?
I can't explain it any more clearly so I hope you've got it now. |
Yes thanks Dolly, now you've not misdirected me, I understand your point! But disagree with your conclusions. | |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:38 - Feb 23 with 476 views | chicoazul |
| Hypothetically speaking on 14:34 - Feb 22 by DanTheMan |
I may be reading this wrong but I think Chico was being sarcastic. |
No, BlueNomad is right! Several people equivocate the USSR with Putin when very few things could be further from the truth. The idea that Corbs would be Putins mate is utterly insane. |  |
| |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:39 - Feb 23 with 469 views | MattinLondon |
| Hypothetically speaking on 10:30 - Feb 23 by blueasfook |
Here's another way then...
"We voted Tory to ensure Momentum-backed nutters like Corbyn and Abbott never got near Number 10" |
And instead you voted for the Common Sense loonies. The tell-it-like-it-is crew who, when their popularity seems to decrease, wrap their cocks and tits in Union Flags and the idiots fall for this patriotic bull s**t. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
